剖宫产术中的抗生素预防——300例剖宫产术中哌拉西林与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的比较

K J Wagner, U Bier, R Callies, P A Regidor, A E Schindler
{"title":"剖宫产术中的抗生素预防——300例剖宫产术中哌拉西林与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的比较","authors":"K J Wagner,&nbsp;U Bier,&nbsp;R Callies,&nbsp;P A Regidor,&nbsp;A E Schindler","doi":"10.1055/s-2005-872566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antibiotic prophylaxis is a standard procedure in obstetric surgery and has been discussed in various investigations. Use of treatment is judged by high efficacy and good tolerance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In 300 patients undergoing cesarean sections we compared results of application of Piperacillin 4 g and Piperacillin/Tazobactam 4.5 g after cut of umbilical cord. Tazobactam/Piperacillin is a combination of a broad-spectrum penicillin and a beta-lactamase inhibitor with increased toxicity against staph. aureus, enterobacter, and other germs responsible for local and systemic infections in obstetric surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We did not observe any severe adverse effects. Rate of severe wound infections was 1.3 % (Tazobactam/Piperacillin) and 2 % (Piperacillin alone). The difference showed no statistic significance (p > 0.01). During postoperative course we found a higher increase of CRP (p < 0.01) in the Piperacillin group. CRP proved to be a useful objective parameter to distinguish between patients with or without postoperative infections. No differences were found in the number of leucocytes, time in hospital and other parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":23881,"journal":{"name":"Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie","volume":"128 3","pages":"149-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2005-872566","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section -- piperacillin versus piperacillin/tazobactam in 300 cesarean sections].\",\"authors\":\"K J Wagner,&nbsp;U Bier,&nbsp;R Callies,&nbsp;P A Regidor,&nbsp;A E Schindler\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-2005-872566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antibiotic prophylaxis is a standard procedure in obstetric surgery and has been discussed in various investigations. Use of treatment is judged by high efficacy and good tolerance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In 300 patients undergoing cesarean sections we compared results of application of Piperacillin 4 g and Piperacillin/Tazobactam 4.5 g after cut of umbilical cord. Tazobactam/Piperacillin is a combination of a broad-spectrum penicillin and a beta-lactamase inhibitor with increased toxicity against staph. aureus, enterobacter, and other germs responsible for local and systemic infections in obstetric surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We did not observe any severe adverse effects. Rate of severe wound infections was 1.3 % (Tazobactam/Piperacillin) and 2 % (Piperacillin alone). The difference showed no statistic significance (p > 0.01). During postoperative course we found a higher increase of CRP (p < 0.01) in the Piperacillin group. CRP proved to be a useful objective parameter to distinguish between patients with or without postoperative infections. No differences were found in the number of leucocytes, time in hospital and other parameters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie\",\"volume\":\"128 3\",\"pages\":\"149-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-2005-872566\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-872566\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-872566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

前言:抗生素预防是产科手术的标准程序,并在各种调查中进行了讨论。以疗效高、耐受性好为判断标准。方法:对300例剖宫产患者剖宫产后剪脐带后应用哌拉西林4 g与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦4.5 g的效果进行比较。他唑巴坦/哌拉西林是广谱青霉素和β -内酰胺酶抑制剂的组合,对葡萄球菌的毒性增加。产科手术中引起局部和全身感染的金黄色葡萄球菌、肠杆菌和其他细菌。结果:未见严重不良反应。严重伤口感染率为1.3%(他唑巴坦/哌拉西林)和2%(哌拉西林单用)。差异无统计学意义(p > 0.01)。术后,我们发现哌拉西林组CRP升高较高(p < 0.01)。CRP被证明是一个有用的客观参数,以区分患者是否术后感染。白细胞数、住院时间等指标均无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section -- piperacillin versus piperacillin/tazobactam in 300 cesarean sections].

Introduction: Antibiotic prophylaxis is a standard procedure in obstetric surgery and has been discussed in various investigations. Use of treatment is judged by high efficacy and good tolerance.

Method: In 300 patients undergoing cesarean sections we compared results of application of Piperacillin 4 g and Piperacillin/Tazobactam 4.5 g after cut of umbilical cord. Tazobactam/Piperacillin is a combination of a broad-spectrum penicillin and a beta-lactamase inhibitor with increased toxicity against staph. aureus, enterobacter, and other germs responsible for local and systemic infections in obstetric surgery.

Results: We did not observe any severe adverse effects. Rate of severe wound infections was 1.3 % (Tazobactam/Piperacillin) and 2 % (Piperacillin alone). The difference showed no statistic significance (p > 0.01). During postoperative course we found a higher increase of CRP (p < 0.01) in the Piperacillin group. CRP proved to be a useful objective parameter to distinguish between patients with or without postoperative infections. No differences were found in the number of leucocytes, time in hospital and other parameters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信