用于智力迟钝个体的评估工具:潜在的问题和问题。

Kolleen E Hurley, William Paul Deal
{"title":"用于智力迟钝个体的评估工具:潜在的问题和问题。","authors":"Kolleen E Hurley,&nbsp;William Paul Deal","doi":"10.1352/0047-6765(2006)44[112:AIMMUW]2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Malingering, the exaggeration or fabrication of physical and/or psychological symptoms, can threaten the psychological assessment process (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). To enhance the validity of psychological evaluations, researchers have studied trends in malingering and developed instruments for its detection (Rogers, Bagby, & Dickens, 1992; Tombaugh, 1996). These instruments, however, may not be appropriate for individuals with significant subaverage intellectual functioning. Four instruments assessing malingering, frequently used in forensic evaluations, were administered to individuals with mental retardation. Results show that by utilizing established cut-off scores, we were able to classify a significant percentage of participants as \"malingering,\" in spite of directions to perform optimally. Practical implications as well as directions for future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":76152,"journal":{"name":"Mental retardation","volume":"44 2","pages":"112-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1352/0047-6765(2006)44[112:AIMMUW]2.0.CO;2","citationCount":"69","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment instruments measuring malingering used with individuals who have mental retardation: potential problems and issues.\",\"authors\":\"Kolleen E Hurley,&nbsp;William Paul Deal\",\"doi\":\"10.1352/0047-6765(2006)44[112:AIMMUW]2.0.CO;2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Malingering, the exaggeration or fabrication of physical and/or psychological symptoms, can threaten the psychological assessment process (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). To enhance the validity of psychological evaluations, researchers have studied trends in malingering and developed instruments for its detection (Rogers, Bagby, & Dickens, 1992; Tombaugh, 1996). These instruments, however, may not be appropriate for individuals with significant subaverage intellectual functioning. Four instruments assessing malingering, frequently used in forensic evaluations, were administered to individuals with mental retardation. Results show that by utilizing established cut-off scores, we were able to classify a significant percentage of participants as \\\"malingering,\\\" in spite of directions to perform optimally. Practical implications as well as directions for future research are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental retardation\",\"volume\":\"44 2\",\"pages\":\"112-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1352/0047-6765(2006)44[112:AIMMUW]2.0.CO;2\",\"citationCount\":\"69\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental retardation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2006)44[112:AIMMUW]2.0.CO;2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental retardation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2006)44[112:AIMMUW]2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 69

摘要

装病,夸大或捏造身体和/或心理症状,可以威胁到心理评估过程(美国精神病学协会,2000年)。为了提高心理评估的有效性,研究人员研究了装病的趋势,并开发了检测仪器(Rogers, Bagby, & Dickens, 1992;汤博,1996)。然而,这些工具可能不适用于智力功能明显低于平均水平的个体。在法医鉴定中经常使用的四种评估装病的工具被用于智力迟钝的个体。结果表明,通过利用既定的截止分数,我们能够将相当大比例的参与者分类为“装病”,尽管有最佳表现的指示。讨论了该方法的实际意义和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment instruments measuring malingering used with individuals who have mental retardation: potential problems and issues.

Malingering, the exaggeration or fabrication of physical and/or psychological symptoms, can threaten the psychological assessment process (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). To enhance the validity of psychological evaluations, researchers have studied trends in malingering and developed instruments for its detection (Rogers, Bagby, & Dickens, 1992; Tombaugh, 1996). These instruments, however, may not be appropriate for individuals with significant subaverage intellectual functioning. Four instruments assessing malingering, frequently used in forensic evaluations, were administered to individuals with mental retardation. Results show that by utilizing established cut-off scores, we were able to classify a significant percentage of participants as "malingering," in spite of directions to perform optimally. Practical implications as well as directions for future research are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信