老年人认知与预后的研究(SCOPE)——近期分析。

Peter Trenkwalder
{"title":"老年人认知与预后的研究(SCOPE)——近期分析。","authors":"Peter Trenkwalder","doi":"10.1097/01.hjh.0000220415.99610.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Principal results of the Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE) were published in 2003. Blood pressure reduction was pronounced in both the candesartan and control groups, with little difference. With candesartan-based treatment, compared with control, the relative risk of non-fatal stroke was 0.72 (P = 0.04) and of major cardiovascular events 0.89 (P = 0.19). There were no significant differences in cognitive outcomes. We have reviewed recent subgroup analyses in SCOPE. Cardiovascular endpoints were analysed in patients who did not receive add-on treatment after random allocation to groups (post hoc) and in patients with certain characteristics at baseline, such as age, sex, diabetes, isolated systolic hypertension, or a history of stroke. Cognitive endpoints were analysed in patients with baseline Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 24-28, and in those examined with more extensive investigations than the MMSE. In patients without add-on treatment, there were significant risk reductions in the candesartan group in major cardiovascular events [relative risk (RR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 to 0.92] and mortality (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.95). In other subgroups, the relative risks for major cardiovascular events and stroke were generally consistent with those in the entire study population. However, risk reductions in the candesartan group were particularly marked in patients with a history of stroke. In patients with MMSE score 24-28 at baseline, the score declined significantly less in the candesartan group (between-group difference 0.49, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.97). Cardiovascular outcome benefit of candesartan-based treatment was most evident in patients without add-on treatment and in those with a history of stroke. Results in other subgroups were generally consistent with those in the entire SCOPE study population. In patients with slightly low cognitive function at baseline, the MMSE score declined less in the candesartan group.</p>","PeriodicalId":16074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension","volume":"24 1","pages":"S107-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/01.hjh.0000220415.99610.22","citationCount":"39","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE)--recent analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Trenkwalder\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.hjh.0000220415.99610.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Principal results of the Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE) were published in 2003. Blood pressure reduction was pronounced in both the candesartan and control groups, with little difference. With candesartan-based treatment, compared with control, the relative risk of non-fatal stroke was 0.72 (P = 0.04) and of major cardiovascular events 0.89 (P = 0.19). There were no significant differences in cognitive outcomes. We have reviewed recent subgroup analyses in SCOPE. Cardiovascular endpoints were analysed in patients who did not receive add-on treatment after random allocation to groups (post hoc) and in patients with certain characteristics at baseline, such as age, sex, diabetes, isolated systolic hypertension, or a history of stroke. Cognitive endpoints were analysed in patients with baseline Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 24-28, and in those examined with more extensive investigations than the MMSE. In patients without add-on treatment, there were significant risk reductions in the candesartan group in major cardiovascular events [relative risk (RR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 to 0.92] and mortality (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.95). In other subgroups, the relative risks for major cardiovascular events and stroke were generally consistent with those in the entire study population. However, risk reductions in the candesartan group were particularly marked in patients with a history of stroke. In patients with MMSE score 24-28 at baseline, the score declined significantly less in the candesartan group (between-group difference 0.49, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.97). Cardiovascular outcome benefit of candesartan-based treatment was most evident in patients without add-on treatment and in those with a history of stroke. Results in other subgroups were generally consistent with those in the entire SCOPE study population. In patients with slightly low cognitive function at baseline, the MMSE score declined less in the candesartan group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"S107-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/01.hjh.0000220415.99610.22\",\"citationCount\":\"39\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000220415.99610.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000220415.99610.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

摘要

老年人认知与预后研究(SCOPE)的主要结果发表于2003年。坎地沙坦组和对照组血压均明显降低,差异不大。以坎地沙坦为基础的治疗组与对照组相比,非致死性卒中的相对风险为0.72 (P = 0.04),主要心血管事件的相对风险为0.89 (P = 0.19)。在认知结果上没有显著差异。我们在SCOPE中回顾了最近的亚组分析。在随机分组后(事后)未接受附加治疗的患者,以及在基线时具有某些特征(如年龄、性别、糖尿病、孤立性收缩期高血压或卒中史)的患者中,对心血管终点进行分析。认知终点分析了基线迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)评分为24-28分的患者,以及那些接受了比MMSE更广泛调查的患者。在没有附加治疗的患者中,坎地沙坦组在主要心血管事件[相对危险度(RR) 0.68, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.51至0.92]和死亡率(RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57至0.95)方面的风险显著降低。在其他亚组中,主要心血管事件和中风的相对风险总体上与整个研究人群一致。然而,坎地沙坦组的风险降低在有中风史的患者中尤为明显。在基线时MMSE评分为24-28的患者中,坎地沙坦组的评分下降明显更少(组间差异0.49,95% CI 0.02至0.97)。以坎地沙坦为基础的治疗在没有附加治疗的患者和有中风史的患者中心血管结局获益最为明显。其他亚组的结果与整个SCOPE研究人群的结果基本一致。在基线时认知功能稍低的患者中,坎地沙坦组的MMSE评分下降较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE)--recent analyses.

Principal results of the Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE) were published in 2003. Blood pressure reduction was pronounced in both the candesartan and control groups, with little difference. With candesartan-based treatment, compared with control, the relative risk of non-fatal stroke was 0.72 (P = 0.04) and of major cardiovascular events 0.89 (P = 0.19). There were no significant differences in cognitive outcomes. We have reviewed recent subgroup analyses in SCOPE. Cardiovascular endpoints were analysed in patients who did not receive add-on treatment after random allocation to groups (post hoc) and in patients with certain characteristics at baseline, such as age, sex, diabetes, isolated systolic hypertension, or a history of stroke. Cognitive endpoints were analysed in patients with baseline Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 24-28, and in those examined with more extensive investigations than the MMSE. In patients without add-on treatment, there were significant risk reductions in the candesartan group in major cardiovascular events [relative risk (RR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 to 0.92] and mortality (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.95). In other subgroups, the relative risks for major cardiovascular events and stroke were generally consistent with those in the entire study population. However, risk reductions in the candesartan group were particularly marked in patients with a history of stroke. In patients with MMSE score 24-28 at baseline, the score declined significantly less in the candesartan group (between-group difference 0.49, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.97). Cardiovascular outcome benefit of candesartan-based treatment was most evident in patients without add-on treatment and in those with a history of stroke. Results in other subgroups were generally consistent with those in the entire SCOPE study population. In patients with slightly low cognitive function at baseline, the MMSE score declined less in the candesartan group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信