普通外科申请者真的想成为普通外科医生吗?

Dorothy A. Andriole MD, Donna B. Jeffe PhD, Mary Klingensmith MD
{"title":"普通外科申请者真的想成为普通外科医生吗?","authors":"Dorothy A. Andriole MD,&nbsp;Donna B. Jeffe PhD,&nbsp;Mary Klingensmith MD","doi":"10.1016/j.cursur.2005.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The authors sought to compare categorical general surgery applicants with applicants in other specialties regarding their final specialty-choice ranking for residency positions.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The authors analyzed the 2004-match year applicant-pool data from the Electronic Residency Application Service and Common Application Service as well as rank-list data from the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP), the Urology Match Program, and the San Francisco Matching Program for 20 different specialties. Two-tailed chi-square tests measured differences between the proportions of applicants who ultimately ranked programs in categorical general surgery and each of 19 other specialties and between the proportions of U.S. students who ranked categorical general surgery and each of 19 other specialties as a non-preferred choice. A Bonferroni-adjusted alpha was set at 0.0013 to reduce the likelihood of a type I error.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The proportion of applicants ranking each specialty ranged from 42% (786/1859) in pathology to 91% (282/31l) in neurological surgery. The proportion of categorical general surgery applicants ranking categorical general surgery programs was 51% (2004/3900), which was significantly lower than the proportions ranking 12 of 19 other specialties (each p &lt; 0.001). Of the 2004 categorical general surgery applicants ranking categorical general surgery programs, 278 (278/2004, 14%) ranked categorical general surgery as a non-preferred specialty. Among 1230 U.S. students ranking categorical general surgery programs, 144 (12%) did so as a non-preferred specialty—a proportion significantly higher compared with U.S. students ranking 15 of 19 other specialties as non-preferred (each p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In 2004, the categorical general surgery applicant pool was relatively uncommitted to the specialty of general surgery. The number of applicants ranking categorical general surgery as a non-preferred specialty was likely even higher than these data indicate, as unmatched applicants in non-NRMP matches who then ranked categorical general surgery programs in the NRMP were tabulated by the NRMP as having ranked categorical general surgery as their preferred specialty.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75762,"journal":{"name":"Current surgery","volume":"63 2","pages":"Pages 145-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cursur.2005.12.003","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do General Surgery Applicants Really Want to be General Surgeons?\",\"authors\":\"Dorothy A. Andriole MD,&nbsp;Donna B. Jeffe PhD,&nbsp;Mary Klingensmith MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cursur.2005.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The authors sought to compare categorical general surgery applicants with applicants in other specialties regarding their final specialty-choice ranking for residency positions.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The authors analyzed the 2004-match year applicant-pool data from the Electronic Residency Application Service and Common Application Service as well as rank-list data from the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP), the Urology Match Program, and the San Francisco Matching Program for 20 different specialties. Two-tailed chi-square tests measured differences between the proportions of applicants who ultimately ranked programs in categorical general surgery and each of 19 other specialties and between the proportions of U.S. students who ranked categorical general surgery and each of 19 other specialties as a non-preferred choice. A Bonferroni-adjusted alpha was set at 0.0013 to reduce the likelihood of a type I error.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The proportion of applicants ranking each specialty ranged from 42% (786/1859) in pathology to 91% (282/31l) in neurological surgery. The proportion of categorical general surgery applicants ranking categorical general surgery programs was 51% (2004/3900), which was significantly lower than the proportions ranking 12 of 19 other specialties (each p &lt; 0.001). Of the 2004 categorical general surgery applicants ranking categorical general surgery programs, 278 (278/2004, 14%) ranked categorical general surgery as a non-preferred specialty. Among 1230 U.S. students ranking categorical general surgery programs, 144 (12%) did so as a non-preferred specialty—a proportion significantly higher compared with U.S. students ranking 15 of 19 other specialties as non-preferred (each p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In 2004, the categorical general surgery applicant pool was relatively uncommitted to the specialty of general surgery. The number of applicants ranking categorical general surgery as a non-preferred specialty was likely even higher than these data indicate, as unmatched applicants in non-NRMP matches who then ranked categorical general surgery programs in the NRMP were tabulated by the NRMP as having ranked categorical general surgery as their preferred specialty.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current surgery\",\"volume\":\"63 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 145-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cursur.2005.12.003\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149794405002539\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149794405002539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

目的作者试图比较分类普外科申请人与其他专业申请人在住院医师职位的最终专业选择排名。方法分析2004年来自电子住院申请服务和通用申请服务的申请人数据,以及来自全国住院匹配计划(NRMP)、泌尿外科匹配计划和旧金山匹配计划的20个不同专科的排名数据。双尾卡方检验测量了最终将分类普外科和其他19个专业中的每一个专业排序的申请人比例之间的差异,以及将分类普外科和其他19个专业中的每一个专业排序为非首选专业的美国学生比例之间的差异。bonferroni调整后的alpha值设为0.0013,以减少I型误差的可能性。结果各专科报考人数占比从病理学的42%(786/1859)到神经外科的91%(282/ 3111)不等。分类普外科申请人排名分类普外科专业的比例为51%(2004/3900),明显低于其他19个专科(各p <0.001)。在2004年申请分类普外科专业的申请人中,278名(278/2004,14%)将分类普外科列为非首选专业。在1230名美国学生中,有144名(12%)将分类普外科专业列为非首选专业,这一比例明显高于美国学生将其他19个专业中的15个列为非首选专业(每个p <0.001)。结论2004年,普通外科分类申请人群对普通外科专业的认同度较低。将分类普外科列为非首选专业的申请人数量可能比这些数据显示的还要高,因为在非NRMP匹配中不匹配的申请人然后将分类普外科项目列为NRMP中的分类普外科项目,NRMP将其列为首选专业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do General Surgery Applicants Really Want to be General Surgeons?

Objective

The authors sought to compare categorical general surgery applicants with applicants in other specialties regarding their final specialty-choice ranking for residency positions.

Method

The authors analyzed the 2004-match year applicant-pool data from the Electronic Residency Application Service and Common Application Service as well as rank-list data from the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP), the Urology Match Program, and the San Francisco Matching Program for 20 different specialties. Two-tailed chi-square tests measured differences between the proportions of applicants who ultimately ranked programs in categorical general surgery and each of 19 other specialties and between the proportions of U.S. students who ranked categorical general surgery and each of 19 other specialties as a non-preferred choice. A Bonferroni-adjusted alpha was set at 0.0013 to reduce the likelihood of a type I error.

Results

The proportion of applicants ranking each specialty ranged from 42% (786/1859) in pathology to 91% (282/31l) in neurological surgery. The proportion of categorical general surgery applicants ranking categorical general surgery programs was 51% (2004/3900), which was significantly lower than the proportions ranking 12 of 19 other specialties (each p < 0.001). Of the 2004 categorical general surgery applicants ranking categorical general surgery programs, 278 (278/2004, 14%) ranked categorical general surgery as a non-preferred specialty. Among 1230 U.S. students ranking categorical general surgery programs, 144 (12%) did so as a non-preferred specialty—a proportion significantly higher compared with U.S. students ranking 15 of 19 other specialties as non-preferred (each p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In 2004, the categorical general surgery applicant pool was relatively uncommitted to the specialty of general surgery. The number of applicants ranking categorical general surgery as a non-preferred specialty was likely even higher than these data indicate, as unmatched applicants in non-NRMP matches who then ranked categorical general surgery programs in the NRMP were tabulated by the NRMP as having ranked categorical general surgery as their preferred specialty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信