比索洛尔治疗心力衰竭的成本-效果分析。

Francesca Di Stasi, Luciana Scalone, Simona De Portu, Enrica Menditto, Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani
{"title":"比索洛尔治疗心力衰竭的成本-效果分析。","authors":"Francesca Di Stasi,&nbsp;Luciana Scalone,&nbsp;Simona De Portu,&nbsp;Enrica Menditto,&nbsp;Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Beta-blockers have provided evidence of improving survival in chronic heart failure patients. Specifically, the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II has shown a significant reduction in mortality and morbidity among patients with moderate to severe chronic heart failure treated with bisoprolol. Our aim was to investigate the economic consequence of bisoprolol therapy in chronic heart failure patients in Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were derived from the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II trial. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing standard care with bisoprolol vs standard care with placebo in the perspective of the Italian National Health Service. We identified and quantified medical costs: drug costs according to the Italian National Therapeutic Formulary; specialist visits for initiation and up-titration of bisoprolol therapy and hospitalizations were quantified based on the Italian National Health Service tariffs (2005). Effects were measured in terms of mortality and morbidity reduction (number of deaths, life-years gained and frequency of hospitalizations). We considered an observational period of 1.3 years, i.e. the average follow-up recorded in the trial. Discounting was not performed because of the relatively short follow-up of patients. We conducted one- and multiway sensitivity analyses on unit cost and effectiveness. We also conducted a threshold analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall cost of care per 1000 patients treated for 1.3 years was estimated in Euro 2,075,548 in the bisoprolol group and in Euro 2,396,265 in the placebo group, resulting in a net saving of Euro 320,718. The number of additional patients alive with bisoprolol was 55 per 1000 patients, the number of lifeyears gained was 36 at 1.3 year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bisoprolol therapy is dominant since it is both less costly and more effective than standard care. Results of sensitivity analysis showed that bisoprolol therapy remains dominant even to changes in unit cost of drug and hospitalizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":80289,"journal":{"name":"Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology","volume":"6 12","pages":"950-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness analysis of bisoprolol treatment for heart failure.\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Di Stasi,&nbsp;Luciana Scalone,&nbsp;Simona De Portu,&nbsp;Enrica Menditto,&nbsp;Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Beta-blockers have provided evidence of improving survival in chronic heart failure patients. Specifically, the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II has shown a significant reduction in mortality and morbidity among patients with moderate to severe chronic heart failure treated with bisoprolol. Our aim was to investigate the economic consequence of bisoprolol therapy in chronic heart failure patients in Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were derived from the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II trial. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing standard care with bisoprolol vs standard care with placebo in the perspective of the Italian National Health Service. We identified and quantified medical costs: drug costs according to the Italian National Therapeutic Formulary; specialist visits for initiation and up-titration of bisoprolol therapy and hospitalizations were quantified based on the Italian National Health Service tariffs (2005). Effects were measured in terms of mortality and morbidity reduction (number of deaths, life-years gained and frequency of hospitalizations). We considered an observational period of 1.3 years, i.e. the average follow-up recorded in the trial. Discounting was not performed because of the relatively short follow-up of patients. We conducted one- and multiway sensitivity analyses on unit cost and effectiveness. We also conducted a threshold analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall cost of care per 1000 patients treated for 1.3 years was estimated in Euro 2,075,548 in the bisoprolol group and in Euro 2,396,265 in the placebo group, resulting in a net saving of Euro 320,718. The number of additional patients alive with bisoprolol was 55 per 1000 patients, the number of lifeyears gained was 36 at 1.3 year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bisoprolol therapy is dominant since it is both less costly and more effective than standard care. Results of sensitivity analysis showed that bisoprolol therapy remains dominant even to changes in unit cost of drug and hospitalizations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"6 12\",\"pages\":\"950-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:β受体阻滞剂已经提供了改善慢性心力衰竭患者生存率的证据。具体来说,心功能不全比索洛尔研究II显示,比索洛尔治疗的中重度慢性心力衰竭患者的死亡率和发病率显著降低。我们的目的是调查意大利慢性心力衰竭患者比索洛尔治疗的经济后果。方法:数据来源于心脏功能不全比索洛尔研究II试验。我们进行了成本-效果分析,从意大利国家卫生服务的角度比较了比索洛尔的标准治疗与安慰剂的标准治疗。我们确定并量化了医疗费用:根据意大利国家治疗处方的药品费用;根据意大利国家卫生服务收费标准(2005年),对开始和增加比索洛尔治疗和住院的专家就诊进行了量化。根据死亡率和发病率的降低(死亡人数、获得的生命年数和住院次数)来衡量效果。我们考虑的观察期为1.3年,即试验中记录的平均随访时间。由于患者随访时间相对较短,因此未进行折扣。我们对单位成本和效果进行了单向和多向敏感性分析。我们还进行了阈值分析。结果:在1.3年的治疗中,比索洛尔组每1000名患者的总护理成本估计为2,0075,548欧元,安慰剂组为2,396,265欧元,净节省320,718欧元。使用比索洛尔的额外存活患者数量为55 / 1000,在1.3年时增加的生命年数为36。结论:比索洛尔治疗占主导地位,因为它比标准治疗更便宜,更有效。敏感性分析结果显示,即使单位药物费用和住院费用发生变化,比索洛尔治疗仍占主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-effectiveness analysis of bisoprolol treatment for heart failure.

Background: Beta-blockers have provided evidence of improving survival in chronic heart failure patients. Specifically, the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II has shown a significant reduction in mortality and morbidity among patients with moderate to severe chronic heart failure treated with bisoprolol. Our aim was to investigate the economic consequence of bisoprolol therapy in chronic heart failure patients in Italy.

Methods: Data were derived from the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II trial. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing standard care with bisoprolol vs standard care with placebo in the perspective of the Italian National Health Service. We identified and quantified medical costs: drug costs according to the Italian National Therapeutic Formulary; specialist visits for initiation and up-titration of bisoprolol therapy and hospitalizations were quantified based on the Italian National Health Service tariffs (2005). Effects were measured in terms of mortality and morbidity reduction (number of deaths, life-years gained and frequency of hospitalizations). We considered an observational period of 1.3 years, i.e. the average follow-up recorded in the trial. Discounting was not performed because of the relatively short follow-up of patients. We conducted one- and multiway sensitivity analyses on unit cost and effectiveness. We also conducted a threshold analysis.

Results: The overall cost of care per 1000 patients treated for 1.3 years was estimated in Euro 2,075,548 in the bisoprolol group and in Euro 2,396,265 in the placebo group, resulting in a net saving of Euro 320,718. The number of additional patients alive with bisoprolol was 55 per 1000 patients, the number of lifeyears gained was 36 at 1.3 year.

Conclusions: Bisoprolol therapy is dominant since it is both less costly and more effective than standard care. Results of sensitivity analysis showed that bisoprolol therapy remains dominant even to changes in unit cost of drug and hospitalizations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信