回顾性病例系列骨骼调查在儿童怀疑非意外伤害

Fiona Day , Sarah Clegg , Maeve McPhillips , Jacqueline Mok
{"title":"回顾性病例系列骨骼调查在儿童怀疑非意外伤害","authors":"Fiona Day ,&nbsp;Sarah Clegg ,&nbsp;Maeve McPhillips ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Mok","doi":"10.1016/j.jcfm.2005.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The skeletal survey is widely used as the principal radiological investigation in suspected physical abuse of infants and young children. However, the evidence on which current guidelines are based is limited, especially for siblings of index cases. We conducted a retrospective study to describe the characteristics of children who underwent skeletal surveys for suspected non-accidental injury (NAI) in the Edinburgh area; to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of skeletal surveys; and to identify any predictive factors that might guide clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All skeletal surveys performed at the Royal Hospital for Sick Children in Edinburgh for suspected non-accidental injury between 1/1/99 and 31/12/03 were reviewed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventy-seven children underwent skeletal surveys for suspected NAI. Data were available for 76 (70 index cases and 6 siblings). Of the index cases, 17 (24%) skeletal surveys were positive, with a mean of 2.5 fractures per child (range 0–9). The age of positive cases ranged from 2 weeks to 36 months with the majority (14, 82%) being under 12 months of age. Nine (53%) were boys. In index children with positive results, indications for skeletal survey were head injury (skull fracture in 2, 12%; intracranial injury in 4,24%); skeletal fracture (excluding skull fracture) in 6 (35%) and bruising in 4 (24%). χ<sup>2</sup> analysis revealed no significant differences in age, sex or primary reason for skeletal survey between those with a negative and positive skeletal survey.</p><p>Six skeletal surveys were performed on siblings of children with known or suspected NAI. The siblings’ ages ranged from 1 to 36 months although 3 (50%) were under 12 months of age. One (17%) of the siblings’ surveys (a twin) was positive.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The age of a child (&lt;12 months) and type of presenting injury (overt fracture or head injury) are factors which can help the clinician to decide whether or not to obtain a skeletal survey. There remains a lack of evidence for the effectiveness of skeletal survey in the siblings of index children. Guidelines for the process of repeating uncertain skeletal surveys are needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical forensic medicine","volume":"13 2","pages":"Pages 55-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jcfm.2005.08.001","citationCount":"68","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective case series of skeletal surveys in children with suspected non-accidental injury\",\"authors\":\"Fiona Day ,&nbsp;Sarah Clegg ,&nbsp;Maeve McPhillips ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Mok\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcfm.2005.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The skeletal survey is widely used as the principal radiological investigation in suspected physical abuse of infants and young children. However, the evidence on which current guidelines are based is limited, especially for siblings of index cases. We conducted a retrospective study to describe the characteristics of children who underwent skeletal surveys for suspected non-accidental injury (NAI) in the Edinburgh area; to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of skeletal surveys; and to identify any predictive factors that might guide clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All skeletal surveys performed at the Royal Hospital for Sick Children in Edinburgh for suspected non-accidental injury between 1/1/99 and 31/12/03 were reviewed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventy-seven children underwent skeletal surveys for suspected NAI. Data were available for 76 (70 index cases and 6 siblings). Of the index cases, 17 (24%) skeletal surveys were positive, with a mean of 2.5 fractures per child (range 0–9). The age of positive cases ranged from 2 weeks to 36 months with the majority (14, 82%) being under 12 months of age. Nine (53%) were boys. In index children with positive results, indications for skeletal survey were head injury (skull fracture in 2, 12%; intracranial injury in 4,24%); skeletal fracture (excluding skull fracture) in 6 (35%) and bruising in 4 (24%). χ<sup>2</sup> analysis revealed no significant differences in age, sex or primary reason for skeletal survey between those with a negative and positive skeletal survey.</p><p>Six skeletal surveys were performed on siblings of children with known or suspected NAI. The siblings’ ages ranged from 1 to 36 months although 3 (50%) were under 12 months of age. One (17%) of the siblings’ surveys (a twin) was positive.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The age of a child (&lt;12 months) and type of presenting injury (overt fracture or head injury) are factors which can help the clinician to decide whether or not to obtain a skeletal survey. There remains a lack of evidence for the effectiveness of skeletal survey in the siblings of index children. Guidelines for the process of repeating uncertain skeletal surveys are needed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical forensic medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 55-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jcfm.2005.08.001\",\"citationCount\":\"68\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical forensic medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353113105001409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical forensic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353113105001409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 68

摘要

骨骼调查被广泛用作怀疑婴儿和幼儿身体虐待的主要放射学调查。然而,目前指南所依据的证据是有限的,特别是对于指示病例的兄弟姐妹。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以描述在爱丁堡地区因疑似非意外伤害(NAI)而接受骨骼调查的儿童的特征;评价骨骼调查的诊断效果;并确定任何可能指导临床实践的预测因素。方法回顾1999年1月1日至2003年12月31日在爱丁堡皇家儿童医院因疑似非意外伤害而进行的骨骼调查。结果77例患儿接受了疑似NAI的骨骼调查。有76例(70例索引病例和6例兄弟姐妹)的资料。在指标病例中,17例(24%)骨骼调查呈阳性,平均每个儿童2.5例骨折(范围0-9)。阳性病例的年龄从2周至36个月不等,大多数(14.82%)年龄在12个月以下。9例(53%)为男孩。在结果阳性的指数儿童中,骨骼调查的指征为头部损伤(颅骨骨折占2.12%;颅内损伤4例(24%);骨骼骨折(不包括颅骨骨折)6例(35%),挫伤4例(24%)。χ2分析显示,骨密度调查阳性和阴性人群在年龄、性别、主要原因等方面均无统计学差异。对已知或怀疑患有NAI的儿童的兄弟姐妹进行了六次骨骼调查。兄弟姐妹的年龄从1个月到36个月不等,其中3例(50%)年龄在12个月以下。兄弟姐妹中有一个(17%)的调查结果是阳性的(一对双胞胎)。结论儿童的年龄(12个月)和表现损伤类型(显性骨折或头部损伤)是临床医生决定是否进行骨骼调查的因素。在索引儿童的兄弟姐妹中,骨骼调查的有效性仍然缺乏证据。需要对重复不确定的骨骼调查过程制定指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A retrospective case series of skeletal surveys in children with suspected non-accidental injury

Introduction

The skeletal survey is widely used as the principal radiological investigation in suspected physical abuse of infants and young children. However, the evidence on which current guidelines are based is limited, especially for siblings of index cases. We conducted a retrospective study to describe the characteristics of children who underwent skeletal surveys for suspected non-accidental injury (NAI) in the Edinburgh area; to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of skeletal surveys; and to identify any predictive factors that might guide clinical practice.

Methods

All skeletal surveys performed at the Royal Hospital for Sick Children in Edinburgh for suspected non-accidental injury between 1/1/99 and 31/12/03 were reviewed.

Results

Seventy-seven children underwent skeletal surveys for suspected NAI. Data were available for 76 (70 index cases and 6 siblings). Of the index cases, 17 (24%) skeletal surveys were positive, with a mean of 2.5 fractures per child (range 0–9). The age of positive cases ranged from 2 weeks to 36 months with the majority (14, 82%) being under 12 months of age. Nine (53%) were boys. In index children with positive results, indications for skeletal survey were head injury (skull fracture in 2, 12%; intracranial injury in 4,24%); skeletal fracture (excluding skull fracture) in 6 (35%) and bruising in 4 (24%). χ2 analysis revealed no significant differences in age, sex or primary reason for skeletal survey between those with a negative and positive skeletal survey.

Six skeletal surveys were performed on siblings of children with known or suspected NAI. The siblings’ ages ranged from 1 to 36 months although 3 (50%) were under 12 months of age. One (17%) of the siblings’ surveys (a twin) was positive.

Conclusion

The age of a child (<12 months) and type of presenting injury (overt fracture or head injury) are factors which can help the clinician to decide whether or not to obtain a skeletal survey. There remains a lack of evidence for the effectiveness of skeletal survey in the siblings of index children. Guidelines for the process of repeating uncertain skeletal surveys are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信