雷尼替丁与法莫替丁比较对胃溃疡愈合质量的影响:一项随机、对照、多中心试验。

K Higuchi, T Watanabe, K Tominaga, M Shiba, K Nakagawa, H Uno, K Kitada, H Satoh, S Chono, T Uchida, Y Fujiwara, T Arakawa
{"title":"雷尼替丁与法莫替丁比较对胃溃疡愈合质量的影响:一项随机、对照、多中心试验。","authors":"K Higuchi,&nbsp;T Watanabe,&nbsp;K Tominaga,&nbsp;M Shiba,&nbsp;K Nakagawa,&nbsp;H Uno,&nbsp;K Kitada,&nbsp;H Satoh,&nbsp;S Chono,&nbsp;T Uchida,&nbsp;Y Fujiwara,&nbsp;T Arakawa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ranitidine has been found to have anti-inflammatory action as well as antisecretory action in experimental models. However, there are no reports in human gastric ulcer. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of ranitidine compared with those of famotidine on the quality of gastric ulcer healing. We randomly assigned 69 consecutive patients with gastric ulcers to ranitidine (n = 34) or famotidine (n = 35) for 12 weeks, with endoscopic assessment of the quality of gastric ulcer healing and histological assessment of gastric mucosa 12 weeks after treatment started. Ulcer healing rates of over 95% were very similar in the two groups. The rates of ulcer scars with a flat pattern (good-quality healing) were significantly higher in the ranitidine group than in the famotidine group (per protocol, 63.0% and 34.5%, p = 0.033). The neutrophil infiltration score in the body mucosa treated with famotidine, but not ranitidine, significantly increased after treatment. In contrast, the mononuclear cell infiltration score in the antral mucosa treated with ranitidine, but not in that treated with famotidine, had significantly decreased. In conclusion, initial therapy with ranitidine significantly improved the quality of gastric ulcer healing and the histological scores of gastric mucosa compared with famotidine.</p>","PeriodicalId":13940,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology research","volume":"25 4","pages":"187-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of ranitidine on quality of gastric ulcer healing compared with famotidine: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial.\",\"authors\":\"K Higuchi,&nbsp;T Watanabe,&nbsp;K Tominaga,&nbsp;M Shiba,&nbsp;K Nakagawa,&nbsp;H Uno,&nbsp;K Kitada,&nbsp;H Satoh,&nbsp;S Chono,&nbsp;T Uchida,&nbsp;Y Fujiwara,&nbsp;T Arakawa\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ranitidine has been found to have anti-inflammatory action as well as antisecretory action in experimental models. However, there are no reports in human gastric ulcer. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of ranitidine compared with those of famotidine on the quality of gastric ulcer healing. We randomly assigned 69 consecutive patients with gastric ulcers to ranitidine (n = 34) or famotidine (n = 35) for 12 weeks, with endoscopic assessment of the quality of gastric ulcer healing and histological assessment of gastric mucosa 12 weeks after treatment started. Ulcer healing rates of over 95% were very similar in the two groups. The rates of ulcer scars with a flat pattern (good-quality healing) were significantly higher in the ranitidine group than in the famotidine group (per protocol, 63.0% and 34.5%, p = 0.033). The neutrophil infiltration score in the body mucosa treated with famotidine, but not ranitidine, significantly increased after treatment. In contrast, the mononuclear cell infiltration score in the antral mucosa treated with ranitidine, but not in that treated with famotidine, had significantly decreased. In conclusion, initial therapy with ranitidine significantly improved the quality of gastric ulcer healing and the histological scores of gastric mucosa compared with famotidine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology research\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"187-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在实验模型中发现雷尼替丁具有抗炎和抗分泌作用。然而,没有关于人胃溃疡的报道。本研究的目的是探讨雷尼替丁与法莫替丁对胃溃疡愈合质量的影响。我们将69例连续胃溃疡患者随机分配给雷尼替丁(n = 34)或法莫替丁(n = 35)治疗12周,并在治疗开始12周后进行胃溃疡愈合质量的内镜评估和胃粘膜组织学评估。两组的溃疡愈合率均在95%以上。雷尼替丁组溃疡疤痕呈平型(愈合质量良好)的比例显著高于法莫替丁组(每个方案分别为63.0%和34.5%,p = 0.033)。法莫替丁治疗后,机体黏膜中性粒细胞浸润评分显著升高,雷尼替丁治疗后无显著升高。相比之下,雷尼替丁组胃窦粘膜单核细胞浸润评分明显下降,而法莫替丁组则无明显下降。综上所述,与法莫替丁相比,雷尼替丁初始治疗可显著改善胃溃疡愈合质量和胃黏膜组织学评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of ranitidine on quality of gastric ulcer healing compared with famotidine: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial.

Ranitidine has been found to have anti-inflammatory action as well as antisecretory action in experimental models. However, there are no reports in human gastric ulcer. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of ranitidine compared with those of famotidine on the quality of gastric ulcer healing. We randomly assigned 69 consecutive patients with gastric ulcers to ranitidine (n = 34) or famotidine (n = 35) for 12 weeks, with endoscopic assessment of the quality of gastric ulcer healing and histological assessment of gastric mucosa 12 weeks after treatment started. Ulcer healing rates of over 95% were very similar in the two groups. The rates of ulcer scars with a flat pattern (good-quality healing) were significantly higher in the ranitidine group than in the famotidine group (per protocol, 63.0% and 34.5%, p = 0.033). The neutrophil infiltration score in the body mucosa treated with famotidine, but not ranitidine, significantly increased after treatment. In contrast, the mononuclear cell infiltration score in the antral mucosa treated with ranitidine, but not in that treated with famotidine, had significantly decreased. In conclusion, initial therapy with ranitidine significantly improved the quality of gastric ulcer healing and the histological scores of gastric mucosa compared with famotidine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信