奖励参加个案会议的私人精神病医生。

Jane E Pirkis, Alan N Headey, Philip M Burgess, Harvey A Whiteford, Josh P White, Catherine Francis
{"title":"奖励参加个案会议的私人精神病医生。","authors":"Jane E Pirkis,&nbsp;Alan N Headey,&nbsp;Philip M Burgess,&nbsp;Harvey A Whiteford,&nbsp;Josh P White,&nbsp;Catherine Francis","doi":"10.1186/1743-8462-2-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>On 1 November 2000, a series of new item numbers was added to the Medicare Benefits Schedule, which allowed for case conferences between physicians (including psychiatrists) and other multidisciplinary providers. On 1 November 2002, an additional set of numbers was added, designed especially for use by psychiatrists. This paper reports the findings of an evaluation of these item numbers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The uptake of the item numbers in the three years post their introduction was low to moderate at best. Eighty nine psychiatrists rendered 479 case conferences at a cost to the Health Insurance Commission of $70,584. Psychiatrists who have used the item numbers are generally positive about them, as are consumers. Psychiatrists who have not used them have generally not done so because of a lack of knowledge, rather than direct opposition. The use of the item numbers is increasing over time, perhaps as psychiatrists become more aware of their existence and of their utility in maximising quality of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The case conferencing item numbers have potential, but as yet this potential is not being realised. Some small changes to the conditions associated with the use of the item numbers could assist their uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":87170,"journal":{"name":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","volume":"2 ","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1743-8462-2-33","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remunerating private psychiatrists for participating in case conferences.\",\"authors\":\"Jane E Pirkis,&nbsp;Alan N Headey,&nbsp;Philip M Burgess,&nbsp;Harvey A Whiteford,&nbsp;Josh P White,&nbsp;Catherine Francis\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1743-8462-2-33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>On 1 November 2000, a series of new item numbers was added to the Medicare Benefits Schedule, which allowed for case conferences between physicians (including psychiatrists) and other multidisciplinary providers. On 1 November 2002, an additional set of numbers was added, designed especially for use by psychiatrists. This paper reports the findings of an evaluation of these item numbers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The uptake of the item numbers in the three years post their introduction was low to moderate at best. Eighty nine psychiatrists rendered 479 case conferences at a cost to the Health Insurance Commission of $70,584. Psychiatrists who have used the item numbers are generally positive about them, as are consumers. Psychiatrists who have not used them have generally not done so because of a lack of knowledge, rather than direct opposition. The use of the item numbers is increasing over time, perhaps as psychiatrists become more aware of their existence and of their utility in maximising quality of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The case conferencing item numbers have potential, but as yet this potential is not being realised. Some small changes to the conditions associated with the use of the item numbers could assist their uptake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australia and New Zealand health policy\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1743-8462-2-33\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australia and New Zealand health policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-2-33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australia and New Zealand health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8462-2-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:2000年11月1日,一系列新的项目编号被添加到医疗保险福利计划中,这允许医生(包括精神科医生)和其他多学科提供者之间的病例会议。2002年11月1日,又增加了一套专门为精神病医生设计的数字。本文报告了对这些项目编号进行评估的结果。结果:在引入项目编号后的三年内,项目编号的吸收程度为低至中等。89名精神病医生进行了479次病例会议,健康保险委员会的费用为70 584美元。使用过项目编号的精神病医生和消费者一般都对它们持肯定态度。没有使用它们的精神病医生通常是因为缺乏知识,而不是直接反对。随着时间的推移,项目编号的使用越来越多,也许是因为精神科医生越来越意识到它们的存在以及它们在最大限度地提高护理质量方面的效用。结论:病例会议项目编号具有潜力,但这种潜力尚未得到实现。与使用项目编号相关的条件的一些小变化可以帮助他们理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Remunerating private psychiatrists for participating in case conferences.

Remunerating private psychiatrists for participating in case conferences.

Background: On 1 November 2000, a series of new item numbers was added to the Medicare Benefits Schedule, which allowed for case conferences between physicians (including psychiatrists) and other multidisciplinary providers. On 1 November 2002, an additional set of numbers was added, designed especially for use by psychiatrists. This paper reports the findings of an evaluation of these item numbers.

Results: The uptake of the item numbers in the three years post their introduction was low to moderate at best. Eighty nine psychiatrists rendered 479 case conferences at a cost to the Health Insurance Commission of $70,584. Psychiatrists who have used the item numbers are generally positive about them, as are consumers. Psychiatrists who have not used them have generally not done so because of a lack of knowledge, rather than direct opposition. The use of the item numbers is increasing over time, perhaps as psychiatrists become more aware of their existence and of their utility in maximising quality of care.

Conclusion: The case conferencing item numbers have potential, but as yet this potential is not being realised. Some small changes to the conditions associated with the use of the item numbers could assist their uptake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信