过早绝经:妇女健康倡议后的管理挑战。

Julie Ayres
{"title":"过早绝经:妇女健康倡议后的管理挑战。","authors":"Julie Ayres","doi":"10.1258/136218005775544363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correspondence: Dr Julie Ayres, Hospital Practitioner, Menopause Clinic, Gynaecology Outpatient Department, Clarendon Wing, General Infirmary at Leeds, Belmont Grove, Leeds LS2 9NS, UK. Email: Julie.ayres@leedsth.nhs.uk If the media can twist official statements on the subject of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and its safety (or otherwise), what chance does Josephine public have of really understanding the issues that she needs to cover before committing herself to taking something that she has been led to believe might kill her? Consultations, for menopausal women, take a great deal of time to equip patients with enough information to facilitate an informed decision. But one area that should really be quite straight forward is the woman who has undergone a premature menopause, for whom the advice from regulatory authorities such as the Committee on Safety of Medicines is to take HRT until the average of menopause (51 years), during which time there is no evidence of an increased risk of breast cancer or cardiovascular disease. But time and time again I am seeing referrals for women who have been told to stop HRT, by their primary care physician, because they have taken it for 5, 10 years, or whatever their doctor decides is time enough, despite them still being under 50. It is important to emphasize that both the Women’s Health Initiative and the Million Women study were undertaken in women aged 50 and over.1,2 Their findings cannot be extrapolated to younger women, who would normally be producing their own endogenous estrogen. Indeed, I would suggest that a case could be made to illustrate the apparent differences in risk by referring to HRT under the age of 50 as true hormone ‘replacement’ and that HRT in the over-50s be referred to as hormone ‘extension’ therapy, at least in counselling those with a premature menopause. It is always pleasing to see a confused and worried patient’s face light up with understanding and relief over this important subject when this point is made. It is essential to assess studies critically and not to generically extrapolate the results of a single study or trial to all menopausal women.","PeriodicalId":85745,"journal":{"name":"The journal of the British Menopause Society","volume":"11 4","pages":"157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1258/136218005775544363","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Premature menopause: management challenges after the Women's Health Initiative.\",\"authors\":\"Julie Ayres\",\"doi\":\"10.1258/136218005775544363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Correspondence: Dr Julie Ayres, Hospital Practitioner, Menopause Clinic, Gynaecology Outpatient Department, Clarendon Wing, General Infirmary at Leeds, Belmont Grove, Leeds LS2 9NS, UK. Email: Julie.ayres@leedsth.nhs.uk If the media can twist official statements on the subject of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and its safety (or otherwise), what chance does Josephine public have of really understanding the issues that she needs to cover before committing herself to taking something that she has been led to believe might kill her? Consultations, for menopausal women, take a great deal of time to equip patients with enough information to facilitate an informed decision. But one area that should really be quite straight forward is the woman who has undergone a premature menopause, for whom the advice from regulatory authorities such as the Committee on Safety of Medicines is to take HRT until the average of menopause (51 years), during which time there is no evidence of an increased risk of breast cancer or cardiovascular disease. But time and time again I am seeing referrals for women who have been told to stop HRT, by their primary care physician, because they have taken it for 5, 10 years, or whatever their doctor decides is time enough, despite them still being under 50. It is important to emphasize that both the Women’s Health Initiative and the Million Women study were undertaken in women aged 50 and over.1,2 Their findings cannot be extrapolated to younger women, who would normally be producing their own endogenous estrogen. Indeed, I would suggest that a case could be made to illustrate the apparent differences in risk by referring to HRT under the age of 50 as true hormone ‘replacement’ and that HRT in the over-50s be referred to as hormone ‘extension’ therapy, at least in counselling those with a premature menopause. It is always pleasing to see a confused and worried patient’s face light up with understanding and relief over this important subject when this point is made. It is essential to assess studies critically and not to generically extrapolate the results of a single study or trial to all menopausal women.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of the British Menopause Society\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1258/136218005775544363\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of the British Menopause Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1258/136218005775544363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of the British Menopause Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1258/136218005775544363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Premature menopause: management challenges after the Women's Health Initiative.
Correspondence: Dr Julie Ayres, Hospital Practitioner, Menopause Clinic, Gynaecology Outpatient Department, Clarendon Wing, General Infirmary at Leeds, Belmont Grove, Leeds LS2 9NS, UK. Email: Julie.ayres@leedsth.nhs.uk If the media can twist official statements on the subject of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and its safety (or otherwise), what chance does Josephine public have of really understanding the issues that she needs to cover before committing herself to taking something that she has been led to believe might kill her? Consultations, for menopausal women, take a great deal of time to equip patients with enough information to facilitate an informed decision. But one area that should really be quite straight forward is the woman who has undergone a premature menopause, for whom the advice from regulatory authorities such as the Committee on Safety of Medicines is to take HRT until the average of menopause (51 years), during which time there is no evidence of an increased risk of breast cancer or cardiovascular disease. But time and time again I am seeing referrals for women who have been told to stop HRT, by their primary care physician, because they have taken it for 5, 10 years, or whatever their doctor decides is time enough, despite them still being under 50. It is important to emphasize that both the Women’s Health Initiative and the Million Women study were undertaken in women aged 50 and over.1,2 Their findings cannot be extrapolated to younger women, who would normally be producing their own endogenous estrogen. Indeed, I would suggest that a case could be made to illustrate the apparent differences in risk by referring to HRT under the age of 50 as true hormone ‘replacement’ and that HRT in the over-50s be referred to as hormone ‘extension’ therapy, at least in counselling those with a premature menopause. It is always pleasing to see a confused and worried patient’s face light up with understanding and relief over this important subject when this point is made. It is essential to assess studies critically and not to generically extrapolate the results of a single study or trial to all menopausal women.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信