实证检验医院业务流程再造成功的决定因素。

Maria do Carmo Caccia-Bava, Valerie C K Guimaraes, Tor Guimaraes
{"title":"实证检验医院业务流程再造成功的决定因素。","authors":"Maria do Carmo Caccia-Bava,&nbsp;Valerie C K Guimaraes,&nbsp;Tor Guimaraes","doi":"10.1108/09526860510627238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Business process reengineering has been touted in the literature as a dramatic improvement necessary for organization competitiveness, but in practice there are many unsuccessful cases. Thus, there is need for a more systematic and rigorous assessment of the factors deemed important to project success. The main objective of this study is to examine this issue.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>For this research, success has been defined as the benefits the hospital has derived from the BPR project, according to top managers' opinions. A sample of 192 hospital administrators shared their organizations' experience with their last BPR project implementation, where the changes have been operational for at least one year.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Based on the results, recommendations are made for hospital managers to focus attention and resources on factors important to BPR project success. In general, hospitals are not emphasizing some of the most important activities and tasks recommended in the BPR literature, such as changes to customer/market-related business processes, the value-added element of every business activity, and applying the right innovative technology.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>Based on the findings as a whole, it behoves top managers not to engage in BPR before ensuring the presence of the success factors found to be important.</p>","PeriodicalId":80009,"journal":{"name":"International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services","volume":"18 6-7","pages":"552-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/09526860510627238","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirically testing determinants of hospital BPR success.\",\"authors\":\"Maria do Carmo Caccia-Bava,&nbsp;Valerie C K Guimaraes,&nbsp;Tor Guimaraes\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/09526860510627238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Business process reengineering has been touted in the literature as a dramatic improvement necessary for organization competitiveness, but in practice there are many unsuccessful cases. Thus, there is need for a more systematic and rigorous assessment of the factors deemed important to project success. The main objective of this study is to examine this issue.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>For this research, success has been defined as the benefits the hospital has derived from the BPR project, according to top managers' opinions. A sample of 192 hospital administrators shared their organizations' experience with their last BPR project implementation, where the changes have been operational for at least one year.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Based on the results, recommendations are made for hospital managers to focus attention and resources on factors important to BPR project success. In general, hospitals are not emphasizing some of the most important activities and tasks recommended in the BPR literature, such as changes to customer/market-related business processes, the value-added element of every business activity, and applying the right innovative technology.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>Based on the findings as a whole, it behoves top managers not to engage in BPR before ensuring the presence of the success factors found to be important.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services\",\"volume\":\"18 6-7\",\"pages\":\"552-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/09526860510627238\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/09526860510627238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/09526860510627238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

目的:业务流程再造在文献中被吹捧为组织竞争力的必要戏剧性改进,但在实践中有许多不成功的案例。因此,需要对被认为对项目成功很重要的因素进行更系统和严格的评估。本研究的主要目的是研究这个问题。设计/方法/方法:在本研究中,根据高层管理人员的意见,成功被定义为医院从BPR项目中获得的利益。192名医院管理人员的样本分享了他们组织在上一次实施BPR项目时的经验,在这些项目中,变革已经实施了至少一年。结果:基于结果,建议医院管理者将注意力和资源集中在影响BPR项目成功的重要因素上。一般来说,医院并没有强调BPR文献中建议的一些最重要的活动和任务,例如改变与客户/市场相关的业务流程,每项业务活动的增值元素,以及应用正确的创新技术。原创性/价值:基于整体发现,在确保发现的重要成功因素存在之前,高层管理人员不应该参与BPR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empirically testing determinants of hospital BPR success.

Purpose: Business process reengineering has been touted in the literature as a dramatic improvement necessary for organization competitiveness, but in practice there are many unsuccessful cases. Thus, there is need for a more systematic and rigorous assessment of the factors deemed important to project success. The main objective of this study is to examine this issue.

Design/methodology/approach: For this research, success has been defined as the benefits the hospital has derived from the BPR project, according to top managers' opinions. A sample of 192 hospital administrators shared their organizations' experience with their last BPR project implementation, where the changes have been operational for at least one year.

Findings: Based on the results, recommendations are made for hospital managers to focus attention and resources on factors important to BPR project success. In general, hospitals are not emphasizing some of the most important activities and tasks recommended in the BPR literature, such as changes to customer/market-related business processes, the value-added element of every business activity, and applying the right innovative technology.

Originality/value: Based on the findings as a whole, it behoves top managers not to engage in BPR before ensuring the presence of the success factors found to be important.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信