肝素诱导的血小板减少症抗体的实验室检测:我们需要多少类?

Theodore E. Warkentin , Jo-Ann I. Sheppard , Jane C. Moore , Kathleen M. Moore , Christopher S. Sigouin , John G. Kelton
{"title":"肝素诱导的血小板减少症抗体的实验室检测:我们需要多少类?","authors":"Theodore E. Warkentin ,&nbsp;Jo-Ann I. Sheppard ,&nbsp;Jane C. Moore ,&nbsp;Kathleen M. Moore ,&nbsp;Christopher S. Sigouin ,&nbsp;John G. Kelton","doi":"10.1016/j.lab.2005.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is usually caused by platelet-activating antibodies of immunoglobulin G class that recognize platelet factor-4 (PF4) bound to heparin or certain other polyanions. Commercial enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for PF4/polyanion-reactive antibodies detect two immunoglobulin classes (IgA and IgM) besides IgG. To investigate whether the additional detection of these antibody classes improves or worsens assay operating characteristics, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of EIAs that detect these 3 immunoglobulin classes individually with that of a commercial EIA (Genetic Testing Institute, GTI), as well as a platelet-activation assay, the serotonin-release assay (SRA). We compared the operating characteristics of these 5 assays by evaluating 448 patients, in 14 of whom clinical HIT developed, who received either unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin in prospective studies that included systematic platelet-count monitoring and serologic evaluation for anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies. We found that the SRA and IgG and commercial EIAs had similar high sensitivity for HIT; however, diagnostic specificity (for unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin, respectively) varied considerably, as follows: SRA (95.1%, 97.2%) &gt; IgG EIA (89.0%, 93.7%) &gt; GTI EIA (74.2%, 87.6%). Additional detection of IgA and IgM antibodies by the GTI EIA worsened test specificity by detecting numerous nonpathogenic antibodies. Moreover, the frequency and magnitude of IgA and IgM antibody formation in non-HIT immune responses did not differ from that exhibited by patients in whom clinical HIT developed. We conclude that an EIA that detects anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies of only the IgG class has greater diagnostic usefulness in revealing clinical HIT than does an assay that also detects IgA and IgM class antibodies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine","volume":"146 6","pages":"Pages 341-346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.lab.2005.08.003","citationCount":"251","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laboratory testing for the antibodies that cause heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: How much class do we need?\",\"authors\":\"Theodore E. Warkentin ,&nbsp;Jo-Ann I. Sheppard ,&nbsp;Jane C. Moore ,&nbsp;Kathleen M. Moore ,&nbsp;Christopher S. Sigouin ,&nbsp;John G. Kelton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lab.2005.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is usually caused by platelet-activating antibodies of immunoglobulin G class that recognize platelet factor-4 (PF4) bound to heparin or certain other polyanions. Commercial enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for PF4/polyanion-reactive antibodies detect two immunoglobulin classes (IgA and IgM) besides IgG. To investigate whether the additional detection of these antibody classes improves or worsens assay operating characteristics, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of EIAs that detect these 3 immunoglobulin classes individually with that of a commercial EIA (Genetic Testing Institute, GTI), as well as a platelet-activation assay, the serotonin-release assay (SRA). We compared the operating characteristics of these 5 assays by evaluating 448 patients, in 14 of whom clinical HIT developed, who received either unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin in prospective studies that included systematic platelet-count monitoring and serologic evaluation for anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies. We found that the SRA and IgG and commercial EIAs had similar high sensitivity for HIT; however, diagnostic specificity (for unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin, respectively) varied considerably, as follows: SRA (95.1%, 97.2%) &gt; IgG EIA (89.0%, 93.7%) &gt; GTI EIA (74.2%, 87.6%). Additional detection of IgA and IgM antibodies by the GTI EIA worsened test specificity by detecting numerous nonpathogenic antibodies. Moreover, the frequency and magnitude of IgA and IgM antibody formation in non-HIT immune responses did not differ from that exhibited by patients in whom clinical HIT developed. We conclude that an EIA that detects anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies of only the IgG class has greater diagnostic usefulness in revealing clinical HIT than does an assay that also detects IgA and IgM class antibodies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"146 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 341-346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.lab.2005.08.003\",\"citationCount\":\"251\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022214305002829\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022214305002829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 251

摘要

肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)通常是由免疫球蛋白G类的血小板活化抗体引起的,该抗体识别与肝素或某些其他多阴离子结合的血小板因子-4 (PF4)。PF4/多阴离子反应性抗体的商业酶免疫测定(EIAs)除检测IgG外,还检测两类免疫球蛋白(IgA和IgM)。为了研究这些抗体类别的额外检测是否会改善或恶化分析的操作特性,我们比较了单独检测这3种免疫球蛋白类别的EIA与商业EIA(基因检测研究所,GTI)的敏感性和特异性,以及血小板活化试验,血清素释放试验(SRA)。我们通过对448例患者进行前瞻性研究,比较了这5种检测方法的操作特征,其中14例患者出现临床HIT,接受未分离或低分子量肝素治疗,包括系统的血小板计数监测和抗pf4 /多阴离子抗体的血清学评估。我们发现SRA、IgG和商业eia对HIT具有相似的高敏感性;然而,诊断特异性(分别为未分离肝素和低分子量肝素)差异很大,如下:SRA (95.1%, 97.2%);IgG EIA (89.0%, 93.7%);Gti eia(74.2%, 87.6%)。GTI EIA检测IgA和IgM抗体时,检测到大量非致病性抗体,从而使检测特异性恶化。此外,非HIT免疫反应中IgA和IgM抗体形成的频率和强度与临床HIT患者的表现没有差异。我们的结论是,仅检测IgG类的抗pf4 /多阴离子抗体的EIA在揭示临床HIT方面比同时检测IgA和IgM类抗体的检测更有诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laboratory testing for the antibodies that cause heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: How much class do we need?

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is usually caused by platelet-activating antibodies of immunoglobulin G class that recognize platelet factor-4 (PF4) bound to heparin or certain other polyanions. Commercial enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for PF4/polyanion-reactive antibodies detect two immunoglobulin classes (IgA and IgM) besides IgG. To investigate whether the additional detection of these antibody classes improves or worsens assay operating characteristics, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of EIAs that detect these 3 immunoglobulin classes individually with that of a commercial EIA (Genetic Testing Institute, GTI), as well as a platelet-activation assay, the serotonin-release assay (SRA). We compared the operating characteristics of these 5 assays by evaluating 448 patients, in 14 of whom clinical HIT developed, who received either unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin in prospective studies that included systematic platelet-count monitoring and serologic evaluation for anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies. We found that the SRA and IgG and commercial EIAs had similar high sensitivity for HIT; however, diagnostic specificity (for unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin, respectively) varied considerably, as follows: SRA (95.1%, 97.2%) > IgG EIA (89.0%, 93.7%) > GTI EIA (74.2%, 87.6%). Additional detection of IgA and IgM antibodies by the GTI EIA worsened test specificity by detecting numerous nonpathogenic antibodies. Moreover, the frequency and magnitude of IgA and IgM antibody formation in non-HIT immune responses did not differ from that exhibited by patients in whom clinical HIT developed. We conclude that an EIA that detects anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies of only the IgG class has greater diagnostic usefulness in revealing clinical HIT than does an assay that also detects IgA and IgM class antibodies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信