内感受性意识、情绪体验和脑过程之间的关系

Olga Pollatos , Wladimir Kirsch , Rainer Schandry
{"title":"内感受性意识、情绪体验和脑过程之间的关系","authors":"Olga Pollatos ,&nbsp;Wladimir Kirsch ,&nbsp;Rainer Schandry","doi":"10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The perception of visceral signals plays a crucial role in many theories of emotions. The present study was designed to investigate the relationship between interoceptive awareness and emotion-related brain activity. 44 participants (16 male, 28 female) first underwent a heartbeat perception task and then were categorised either as good (<em>n</em> = 22) or poor heartbeat perceivers (<em>n</em> = 22). A total of 60 different pictures (pleasant, unpleasant, neutral) from the International Affective Picture System served as emotional stimuli. EEG (61 electrodes) and EOG were recorded during slide presentation. After each slide, the subjects had to rate emotional valence and arousal on a 9-point self-report scale. Good heartbeat perceivers scored the emotional slides significantly more arousing than poor heartbeat perceivers; no differences were found in the emotional valence ratings. The visually evoked potentials of good and poor heartbeat perceivers showed significant differences in the P300 and in the slow-wave latency ranges. Statistical analyses revealed significantly higher P300 mean amplitudes for good heartbeat perceivers (averaged across all 60 slides) than for poor heartbeat perceivers. In the slow-wave range, this effect was found for affective slides only. Heartbeat perception scores correlated significantly and positively with both the mean arousal rating as well as with the mean amplitudes in the P300 time window and the slow-wave window. Our results demonstrate a strong relationship between the perception of cardiac signals and the cortical processing of emotional stimuli, as would be postulated for example by the James–Lange theory of emotions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100287,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Brain Research","volume":"25 3","pages":"Pages 948-962"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.019","citationCount":"279","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the relationship between interoceptive awareness, emotional experience, and brain processes\",\"authors\":\"Olga Pollatos ,&nbsp;Wladimir Kirsch ,&nbsp;Rainer Schandry\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The perception of visceral signals plays a crucial role in many theories of emotions. The present study was designed to investigate the relationship between interoceptive awareness and emotion-related brain activity. 44 participants (16 male, 28 female) first underwent a heartbeat perception task and then were categorised either as good (<em>n</em> = 22) or poor heartbeat perceivers (<em>n</em> = 22). A total of 60 different pictures (pleasant, unpleasant, neutral) from the International Affective Picture System served as emotional stimuli. EEG (61 electrodes) and EOG were recorded during slide presentation. After each slide, the subjects had to rate emotional valence and arousal on a 9-point self-report scale. Good heartbeat perceivers scored the emotional slides significantly more arousing than poor heartbeat perceivers; no differences were found in the emotional valence ratings. The visually evoked potentials of good and poor heartbeat perceivers showed significant differences in the P300 and in the slow-wave latency ranges. Statistical analyses revealed significantly higher P300 mean amplitudes for good heartbeat perceivers (averaged across all 60 slides) than for poor heartbeat perceivers. In the slow-wave range, this effect was found for affective slides only. Heartbeat perception scores correlated significantly and positively with both the mean arousal rating as well as with the mean amplitudes in the P300 time window and the slow-wave window. Our results demonstrate a strong relationship between the perception of cardiac signals and the cortical processing of emotional stimuli, as would be postulated for example by the James–Lange theory of emotions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Brain Research\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 948-962\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.019\",\"citationCount\":\"279\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926641005002971\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926641005002971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 279

摘要

对内脏信号的感知在许多情绪理论中起着至关重要的作用。本研究旨在探讨内感受性意识与情绪相关的大脑活动之间的关系。44名参与者(16名男性,28名女性)首先接受了心跳感知任务,然后被分为良好(n = 22)和较差的心跳感知者(n = 22)。来自国际情感图片系统的60张不同的图片(愉快的、不愉快的、中性的)作为情绪刺激。在幻灯片展示过程中记录EEG(61个电极)和EOG。每张幻灯片之后,受试者必须在9分制的自我报告量表上对情绪效价和觉醒进行评分。良好的心跳感知者比差的心跳感知者在情绪幻灯片上得分明显更高;在情绪效价评分上没有发现差异。视觉诱发电位在P300区和慢波潜伏期范围内存在显著差异。统计分析显示,良好的心跳感知者的P300平均幅度(所有60张幻灯片的平均值)明显高于差的心跳感知者。在慢波范围内,这种效应只存在于情感幻灯片上。心跳知觉得分与平均唤醒等级以及P300时间窗和慢波窗口的平均振幅均呈显著正相关。我们的研究结果表明,心脏信号的感知与情绪刺激的皮层处理之间存在着密切的关系,例如詹姆斯-兰格情绪理论就提出了这一假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the relationship between interoceptive awareness, emotional experience, and brain processes

The perception of visceral signals plays a crucial role in many theories of emotions. The present study was designed to investigate the relationship between interoceptive awareness and emotion-related brain activity. 44 participants (16 male, 28 female) first underwent a heartbeat perception task and then were categorised either as good (n = 22) or poor heartbeat perceivers (n = 22). A total of 60 different pictures (pleasant, unpleasant, neutral) from the International Affective Picture System served as emotional stimuli. EEG (61 electrodes) and EOG were recorded during slide presentation. After each slide, the subjects had to rate emotional valence and arousal on a 9-point self-report scale. Good heartbeat perceivers scored the emotional slides significantly more arousing than poor heartbeat perceivers; no differences were found in the emotional valence ratings. The visually evoked potentials of good and poor heartbeat perceivers showed significant differences in the P300 and in the slow-wave latency ranges. Statistical analyses revealed significantly higher P300 mean amplitudes for good heartbeat perceivers (averaged across all 60 slides) than for poor heartbeat perceivers. In the slow-wave range, this effect was found for affective slides only. Heartbeat perception scores correlated significantly and positively with both the mean arousal rating as well as with the mean amplitudes in the P300 time window and the slow-wave window. Our results demonstrate a strong relationship between the perception of cardiac signals and the cortical processing of emotional stimuli, as would be postulated for example by the James–Lange theory of emotions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信