血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)基因插入/缺失多态性是否改变对ACE抑制剂治疗的反应?——系统评价。

Madlaina Scharplatz, Milo A Puhan, Johann Steurer, Annalisa Perna, Lucas M Bachmann
{"title":"血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)基因插入/缺失多态性是否改变对ACE抑制剂治疗的反应?——系统评价。","authors":"Madlaina Scharplatz,&nbsp;Milo A Puhan,&nbsp;Johann Steurer,&nbsp;Annalisa Perna,&nbsp;Lucas M Bachmann","doi":"10.1186/1468-6708-6-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacogenetic testing to individualize ACE inhibitor therapy remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effect modification of the insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the ACE gene on any outcome in patients treated with ACE inhibitors for cardiovascular and/or renal disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our systematic review involved searching six electronic databases, then contacting the investigators (and pharmaceutical industry representatives) responsible for the creation of these databases. Two reviewers independently selected relevant randomized, placebo-controlled trials and abstracted from each study details on characteristics and quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria. Despite repeated efforts to contact authors, only four of the eleven studies provided sufficient data to quantify the effect modification by genotypes. We observed a trend towards better response to ACE inhibitors in Caucasian DD carriers compared to II carriers, in terms of blood pressure, proteinuria, glomerular filtration rate, ACE activity and progression to end-stage renal failure. Pooling of the results was inappropriate, due to heterogeneity in ethnicity, clinical domains and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lack of sufficient genetic data from the reviewed studies precluded drawing any convincing conclusions. Better reporting of genetic data are needed to confirm our preliminary observations concerning better response to ACE inhibitors among Caucasian DD carriers as compared to II carriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":53230,"journal":{"name":"Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"6 ","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1468-6708-6-16","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene insertion/deletion polymorphism modify the response to ACE inhibitor therapy?--A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Madlaina Scharplatz,&nbsp;Milo A Puhan,&nbsp;Johann Steurer,&nbsp;Annalisa Perna,&nbsp;Lucas M Bachmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1468-6708-6-16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacogenetic testing to individualize ACE inhibitor therapy remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effect modification of the insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the ACE gene on any outcome in patients treated with ACE inhibitors for cardiovascular and/or renal disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our systematic review involved searching six electronic databases, then contacting the investigators (and pharmaceutical industry representatives) responsible for the creation of these databases. Two reviewers independently selected relevant randomized, placebo-controlled trials and abstracted from each study details on characteristics and quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria. Despite repeated efforts to contact authors, only four of the eleven studies provided sufficient data to quantify the effect modification by genotypes. We observed a trend towards better response to ACE inhibitors in Caucasian DD carriers compared to II carriers, in terms of blood pressure, proteinuria, glomerular filtration rate, ACE activity and progression to end-stage renal failure. Pooling of the results was inappropriate, due to heterogeneity in ethnicity, clinical domains and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lack of sufficient genetic data from the reviewed studies precluded drawing any convincing conclusions. Better reporting of genetic data are needed to confirm our preliminary observations concerning better response to ACE inhibitors among Caucasian DD carriers as compared to II carriers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1468-6708-6-16\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1468-6708-6-16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1468-6708-6-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

背景:个体化ACE抑制剂治疗的药物遗传学检测仍然存在争议。我们进行了一项系统综述,以评估ACE基因插入/缺失(I/D)多态性的改变对使用ACE抑制剂治疗心血管和/或肾脏疾病患者的任何预后的影响。方法:我们的系统评价包括检索六个电子数据库,然后联系负责创建这些数据库的研究者(和制药行业代表)。两位审稿人独立选择相关的随机、安慰剂对照试验,并从每个研究的特征和质量细节中提取。结果:11项研究符合我们的纳入标准。尽管多次努力联系作者,但11项研究中只有4项提供了足够的数据来量化基因型的影响修饰。我们观察到,在血压、蛋白尿、肾小球滤过率、ACE活性和终末期肾衰竭进展方面,与II型患者相比,白种人DD携带者对ACE抑制剂的反应有更好的趋势。由于种族、临床领域和结果的异质性,合并结果是不合适的。结论:所回顾的研究缺乏足够的遗传数据,因此无法得出任何令人信服的结论。需要更好的遗传数据报告来证实我们的初步观察,即与II携带者相比,高加索DD携带者对ACE抑制剂的反应更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Does the Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene insertion/deletion polymorphism modify the response to ACE inhibitor therapy?--A systematic review.

Does the Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene insertion/deletion polymorphism modify the response to ACE inhibitor therapy?--A systematic review.

Does the Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene insertion/deletion polymorphism modify the response to ACE inhibitor therapy?--A systematic review.

Does the Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene insertion/deletion polymorphism modify the response to ACE inhibitor therapy?--A systematic review.

Background: Pharmacogenetic testing to individualize ACE inhibitor therapy remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effect modification of the insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the ACE gene on any outcome in patients treated with ACE inhibitors for cardiovascular and/or renal disease.

Methods: Our systematic review involved searching six electronic databases, then contacting the investigators (and pharmaceutical industry representatives) responsible for the creation of these databases. Two reviewers independently selected relevant randomized, placebo-controlled trials and abstracted from each study details on characteristics and quality.

Results: Eleven studies met our inclusion criteria. Despite repeated efforts to contact authors, only four of the eleven studies provided sufficient data to quantify the effect modification by genotypes. We observed a trend towards better response to ACE inhibitors in Caucasian DD carriers compared to II carriers, in terms of blood pressure, proteinuria, glomerular filtration rate, ACE activity and progression to end-stage renal failure. Pooling of the results was inappropriate, due to heterogeneity in ethnicity, clinical domains and outcomes.

Conclusion: Lack of sufficient genetic data from the reviewed studies precluded drawing any convincing conclusions. Better reporting of genetic data are needed to confirm our preliminary observations concerning better response to ACE inhibitors among Caucasian DD carriers as compared to II carriers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信