评估非城市医生在突发公共卫生事件和应对中的准备和培训需求

Chiehwen Ed Hsu PhD, Francisco Soto Mas MD, PhD, MPH, Holly Jacobson PhD, Richard Papenfuss PhD, Ella T. Nkhoma MPH, James Zoretic MD, MPH
{"title":"评估非城市医生在突发公共卫生事件和应对中的准备和培训需求","authors":"Chiehwen Ed Hsu PhD,&nbsp;Francisco Soto Mas MD, PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Holly Jacobson PhD,&nbsp;Richard Papenfuss PhD,&nbsp;Ella T. Nkhoma MPH,&nbsp;James Zoretic MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.dmr.2005.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Emergency readiness has become a public health priority for United States communities after the 9/11 attacks. Communities that have a less developed public health infrastructure are challenged to organize preparedness and response efforts and to ensure that health care providers are capable of caring for victims of terrorist acts. A survey was used to assess non-urban physicians' prior experience with and self-confidence in treating, and preferred training needs for responding to chemical, biologic, radiologic, nuclear, and explosive (CBRNE) cases. Data were collected through a mailed and Web-based survey. Although the response rate was calculated at 30%, approximately one third of the surveys were not able to be delivered. Most respondents reported never having seen or treated CBRNE-inflicted cases and were not confident in their ability to diagnose or treat CBRNE cases, but many were willing to participate in a state-led response plan. Almost half of the individuals had not participated in any related training but expressed interest in receiving training in small group workshops or through CD-ROM. These results provide potential direction for strategic preparedness planning for non-urban health care providers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":84599,"journal":{"name":"Disaster management & response : DMR : an official publication of the Emergency Nurses Association","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 106-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.dmr.2005.07.001","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Readiness and Training Needs of Non-urban Physicians in Public Health Emergency and Response\",\"authors\":\"Chiehwen Ed Hsu PhD,&nbsp;Francisco Soto Mas MD, PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Holly Jacobson PhD,&nbsp;Richard Papenfuss PhD,&nbsp;Ella T. Nkhoma MPH,&nbsp;James Zoretic MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dmr.2005.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Emergency readiness has become a public health priority for United States communities after the 9/11 attacks. Communities that have a less developed public health infrastructure are challenged to organize preparedness and response efforts and to ensure that health care providers are capable of caring for victims of terrorist acts. A survey was used to assess non-urban physicians' prior experience with and self-confidence in treating, and preferred training needs for responding to chemical, biologic, radiologic, nuclear, and explosive (CBRNE) cases. Data were collected through a mailed and Web-based survey. Although the response rate was calculated at 30%, approximately one third of the surveys were not able to be delivered. Most respondents reported never having seen or treated CBRNE-inflicted cases and were not confident in their ability to diagnose or treat CBRNE cases, but many were willing to participate in a state-led response plan. Almost half of the individuals had not participated in any related training but expressed interest in receiving training in small group workshops or through CD-ROM. These results provide potential direction for strategic preparedness planning for non-urban health care providers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disaster management & response : DMR : an official publication of the Emergency Nurses Association\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 106-111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.dmr.2005.07.001\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disaster management & response : DMR : an official publication of the Emergency Nurses Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1540248705000647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster management & response : DMR : an official publication of the Emergency Nurses Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1540248705000647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

9/11袭击后,应急准备已成为美国社区的公共卫生优先事项。公共卫生基础设施较不发达的社区面临的挑战是组织防备和应对工作,并确保保健提供者有能力照顾恐怖主义行为的受害者。一项调查用于评估非城市医生在治疗化学、生物、放射、核和爆炸(CBRNE)病例方面的经验和自信,以及首选的培训需求。数据是通过邮寄和网络调查收集的。虽然回复率计算为30%,但约有三分之一的调查未能送达。大多数受访者报告从未见过或治疗过CBRNE造成的病例,并且对自己诊断或治疗CBRNE病例的能力没有信心,但许多人愿意参与国家主导的应对计划。几乎一半的人没有参加任何有关的培训,但表示有兴趣在小组讲习班或通过CD-ROM接受培训。这些结果为非城市卫生保健提供者的战略准备规划提供了潜在的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Readiness and Training Needs of Non-urban Physicians in Public Health Emergency and Response

Emergency readiness has become a public health priority for United States communities after the 9/11 attacks. Communities that have a less developed public health infrastructure are challenged to organize preparedness and response efforts and to ensure that health care providers are capable of caring for victims of terrorist acts. A survey was used to assess non-urban physicians' prior experience with and self-confidence in treating, and preferred training needs for responding to chemical, biologic, radiologic, nuclear, and explosive (CBRNE) cases. Data were collected through a mailed and Web-based survey. Although the response rate was calculated at 30%, approximately one third of the surveys were not able to be delivered. Most respondents reported never having seen or treated CBRNE-inflicted cases and were not confident in their ability to diagnose or treat CBRNE cases, but many were willing to participate in a state-led response plan. Almost half of the individuals had not participated in any related training but expressed interest in receiving training in small group workshops or through CD-ROM. These results provide potential direction for strategic preparedness planning for non-urban health care providers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信