边缘无原体与嗜吞噬细胞无原体的血清学交叉反应性。

U M Dreher, J de la Fuente, R Hofmann-Lehmann, M L Meli, N Pusterla, K M Kocan, Z Woldehiwet, U Braun, G Regula, K D C Staerk, H Lutz
{"title":"边缘无原体与嗜吞噬细胞无原体的血清学交叉反应性。","authors":"U M Dreher,&nbsp;J de la Fuente,&nbsp;R Hofmann-Lehmann,&nbsp;M L Meli,&nbsp;N Pusterla,&nbsp;K M Kocan,&nbsp;Z Woldehiwet,&nbsp;U Braun,&nbsp;G Regula,&nbsp;K D C Staerk,&nbsp;H Lutz","doi":"10.1128/CDLI.12.10.1177-1183.2005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the context of a serosurvey conducted on the Anaplasma marginale prevalence in Swiss cattle, we suspected that a serological cross-reactivity between A. marginale and A. phagocytophilum might exist. In the present study we demonstrate that cattle, sheep and horses experimentally infected with A. phagocytophilum not only develop antibodies to A. phagocytophilum (detected by immunofluorescent-antibody assay) but also to A. marginale (detected by a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). Conversely, calves experimentally infected with A. marginale also developed antibodies to A. phagocytophilum using the same serological tests. The identity of 63% determined in silico within a 209-amino-acid sequence of major surface protein 5 of an isolate of A. marginale and one of A. phagocytophilum supported the observed immunological cross-reactivity. These observations have important consequences for the serotesting of both, A. marginale and A. phagocytophilum infection of several animal species. In view of these new findings, tests that have been considered specific for either infection must be interpreted carefully.</p>","PeriodicalId":72602,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology","volume":"12 10","pages":"1177-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1128/CDLI.12.10.1177-1183.2005","citationCount":"102","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serologic cross-reactivity between Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma phagocytophilum.\",\"authors\":\"U M Dreher,&nbsp;J de la Fuente,&nbsp;R Hofmann-Lehmann,&nbsp;M L Meli,&nbsp;N Pusterla,&nbsp;K M Kocan,&nbsp;Z Woldehiwet,&nbsp;U Braun,&nbsp;G Regula,&nbsp;K D C Staerk,&nbsp;H Lutz\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/CDLI.12.10.1177-1183.2005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the context of a serosurvey conducted on the Anaplasma marginale prevalence in Swiss cattle, we suspected that a serological cross-reactivity between A. marginale and A. phagocytophilum might exist. In the present study we demonstrate that cattle, sheep and horses experimentally infected with A. phagocytophilum not only develop antibodies to A. phagocytophilum (detected by immunofluorescent-antibody assay) but also to A. marginale (detected by a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). Conversely, calves experimentally infected with A. marginale also developed antibodies to A. phagocytophilum using the same serological tests. The identity of 63% determined in silico within a 209-amino-acid sequence of major surface protein 5 of an isolate of A. marginale and one of A. phagocytophilum supported the observed immunological cross-reactivity. These observations have important consequences for the serotesting of both, A. marginale and A. phagocytophilum infection of several animal species. In view of these new findings, tests that have been considered specific for either infection must be interpreted carefully.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology\",\"volume\":\"12 10\",\"pages\":\"1177-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1128/CDLI.12.10.1177-1183.2005\",\"citationCount\":\"102\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.12.10.1177-1183.2005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.12.10.1177-1183.2005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 102

摘要

在对瑞士牛的边缘无形体流行率进行血清调查的背景下,我们怀疑边缘无形体和嗜吞噬细胞无形体之间可能存在血清学交叉反应。在本研究中,我们证明了牛、羊和马通过实验感染了嗜吞噬细胞单胞菌,不仅产生了嗜吞噬细胞单胞菌的抗体(通过免疫荧光抗体检测),而且产生了边缘单胞菌的抗体(通过竞争性酶联免疫吸附试验检测)。相反,实验感染了边缘芽孢杆菌的小牛也通过相同的血清学测试产生了对嗜吞噬细胞芽孢杆菌的抗体。在一个边缘芽孢杆菌和嗜吞噬细胞芽孢杆菌分离物的主要表面蛋白5的209个氨基酸序列中,用计算机测定了63%的同源性,支持了观察到的免疫交叉反应性。这些观察结果对几种动物的边缘芽胞杆菌和嗜吞噬细胞芽胞杆菌感染的血清检测具有重要意义。鉴于这些新的发现,必须仔细解释被认为是针对任何一种感染的特异性检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Serologic cross-reactivity between Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma phagocytophilum.

In the context of a serosurvey conducted on the Anaplasma marginale prevalence in Swiss cattle, we suspected that a serological cross-reactivity between A. marginale and A. phagocytophilum might exist. In the present study we demonstrate that cattle, sheep and horses experimentally infected with A. phagocytophilum not only develop antibodies to A. phagocytophilum (detected by immunofluorescent-antibody assay) but also to A. marginale (detected by a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). Conversely, calves experimentally infected with A. marginale also developed antibodies to A. phagocytophilum using the same serological tests. The identity of 63% determined in silico within a 209-amino-acid sequence of major surface protein 5 of an isolate of A. marginale and one of A. phagocytophilum supported the observed immunological cross-reactivity. These observations have important consequences for the serotesting of both, A. marginale and A. phagocytophilum infection of several animal species. In view of these new findings, tests that have been considered specific for either infection must be interpreted carefully.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信