新生儿重症监护病房出院准备评估和满意度的变化。

Vincent C Smith, Wenyang Mao, Marie C McCormick
{"title":"新生儿重症监护病房出院准备评估和满意度的变化。","authors":"Vincent C Smith,&nbsp;Wenyang Mao,&nbsp;Marie C McCormick","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000000862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A successful transition from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to home is aided by a comprehensive discharge planning program that keeps families involved and engaged with the discharge preparation process.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the assessment of parental NICU discharge preparedness with parental satisfaction with the NICU discharge preparation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Families were surveyed 4 to 6 weeks after NICU discharge, and those selecting \"very prepared\" were considered \"satisfied\" with their discharge preparation. On discharge day, families were considered \"prepared\" for discharge based on their overall level of preparedness and their nurse's rating of them on a discharge readiness assessment tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1104 families (60%) reported being both \"satisfied\" and \"prepared\"; 293 families (16%) were \"satisfied\" but not \"prepared\"; 297 families (16%) were not \"satisfied\" but were \"prepared\"; and 134 families (7%) were neither \"satisfied\" nor \"prepared.\" Compared with families that were both \"satisfied\" and \"prepared,\" families that were neither \"satisfied\" nor \"prepared\" were more likely to be raising the infant alone, of Black race, and to have sicker infants.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Some families are at a higher risk and merit more consideration during NICU discharge planning. Assess the discharge readiness of all families prior to discharge. Those at an increased risk may benefit from more discharge education and training, specifically for single mothers, those with limited resources, or others considered at high risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":520547,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","volume":" ","pages":"E144-E151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in Assessment of and Satisfaction With Discharge Preparation From the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.\",\"authors\":\"Vincent C Smith,&nbsp;Wenyang Mao,&nbsp;Marie C McCormick\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ANC.0000000000000862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A successful transition from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to home is aided by a comprehensive discharge planning program that keeps families involved and engaged with the discharge preparation process.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the assessment of parental NICU discharge preparedness with parental satisfaction with the NICU discharge preparation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Families were surveyed 4 to 6 weeks after NICU discharge, and those selecting \\\"very prepared\\\" were considered \\\"satisfied\\\" with their discharge preparation. On discharge day, families were considered \\\"prepared\\\" for discharge based on their overall level of preparedness and their nurse's rating of them on a discharge readiness assessment tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1104 families (60%) reported being both \\\"satisfied\\\" and \\\"prepared\\\"; 293 families (16%) were \\\"satisfied\\\" but not \\\"prepared\\\"; 297 families (16%) were not \\\"satisfied\\\" but were \\\"prepared\\\"; and 134 families (7%) were neither \\\"satisfied\\\" nor \\\"prepared.\\\" Compared with families that were both \\\"satisfied\\\" and \\\"prepared,\\\" families that were neither \\\"satisfied\\\" nor \\\"prepared\\\" were more likely to be raising the infant alone, of Black race, and to have sicker infants.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Some families are at a higher risk and merit more consideration during NICU discharge planning. Assess the discharge readiness of all families prior to discharge. Those at an increased risk may benefit from more discharge education and training, specifically for single mothers, those with limited resources, or others considered at high risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E144-E151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000000862\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000000862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:从新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)到家庭的成功过渡得益于一个全面的出院计划方案,该方案使家庭参与并参与出院准备过程。目的:比较父母对新生儿重症监护病房出院准备的评估和父母对新生儿重症监护病房出院准备的满意度。方法:在新生儿重症监护病房出院后4 ~ 6周对家庭进行问卷调查,选择“非常准备”的家庭认为对出院准备“满意”。在出院当天,根据他们的整体准备水平和护士在出院准备评估工具上对他们的评分,家庭被认为“准备好”出院。结果:共有1104个家庭(60%)表示“满意”和“准备”;293个家庭(16%)表示“满意”,但没有“做好准备”;297个家庭(16%)不“满意”但“有准备”;134个家庭(7%)既不“满意”也不“准备”。与那些既“满意”又“有准备”的家庭相比,那些既“满意”又“没有准备”的家庭更有可能独自抚养孩子,而且孩子的病情也更严重。对实践的启示:一些家庭在新生儿重症监护病房的出院计划中有更高的风险,值得更多的考虑。在出院前评估所有家庭的出院准备情况。那些风险增加的人可能会受益于更多的出院教育和培训,特别是对单身母亲,资源有限的人,或其他被认为是高风险的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in Assessment of and Satisfaction With Discharge Preparation From the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Background: A successful transition from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to home is aided by a comprehensive discharge planning program that keeps families involved and engaged with the discharge preparation process.

Purpose: To compare the assessment of parental NICU discharge preparedness with parental satisfaction with the NICU discharge preparation.

Methods: Families were surveyed 4 to 6 weeks after NICU discharge, and those selecting "very prepared" were considered "satisfied" with their discharge preparation. On discharge day, families were considered "prepared" for discharge based on their overall level of preparedness and their nurse's rating of them on a discharge readiness assessment tool.

Results: In total, 1104 families (60%) reported being both "satisfied" and "prepared"; 293 families (16%) were "satisfied" but not "prepared"; 297 families (16%) were not "satisfied" but were "prepared"; and 134 families (7%) were neither "satisfied" nor "prepared." Compared with families that were both "satisfied" and "prepared," families that were neither "satisfied" nor "prepared" were more likely to be raising the infant alone, of Black race, and to have sicker infants.

Implications for practice: Some families are at a higher risk and merit more consideration during NICU discharge planning. Assess the discharge readiness of all families prior to discharge. Those at an increased risk may benefit from more discharge education and training, specifically for single mothers, those with limited resources, or others considered at high risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信