深度学习检测放射性骶髂关节炎:实现专家级性能。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Keno K Bressem, Janis L Vahldiek, Lisa Adams, Stefan Markus Niehues, Hildrun Haibel, Valeria Rios Rodriguez, Murat Torgutalp, Mikhail Protopopov, Fabian Proft, Judith Rademacher, Joachim Sieper, Martin Rudwaleit, Bernd Hamm, Marcus R Makowski, Kay-Geert Hermann, Denis Poddubnyy
{"title":"深度学习检测放射性骶髂关节炎:实现专家级性能。","authors":"Keno K Bressem, Janis L Vahldiek, Lisa Adams, Stefan Markus Niehues, Hildrun Haibel, Valeria Rios Rodriguez, Murat Torgutalp, Mikhail Protopopov, Fabian Proft, Judith Rademacher, Joachim Sieper, Martin Rudwaleit, Bernd Hamm, Marcus R Makowski, Kay-Geert Hermann, Denis Poddubnyy","doi":"10.1186/s13075-021-02484-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiographs of the sacroiliac joints are commonly used for the diagnosis and classification of axial spondyloarthritis. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an artificial neural network for the detection of definite radiographic sacroiliitis as a manifestation of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conventional radiographs of the sacroiliac joints obtained in two independent studies of patients with axSpA were used. The first cohort comprised 1553 radiographs and was split into training (n = 1324) and validation (n = 229) sets. The second cohort comprised 458 radiographs and was used as an independent test dataset. All radiographs were assessed in a central reading session, and the final decision on the presence or absence of definite radiographic sacroiliitis was used as a reference. The performance of the neural network was evaluated by calculating areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) as well as sensitivity and specificity. Cohen's kappa and the absolute agreement were used to assess the agreement between the neural network and the human readers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The neural network achieved an excellent performance in the detection of definite radiographic sacroiliitis with an AUC of 0.97 and 0.94 for the validation and test datasets, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for the cut-off weighting both measurements equally were 88% and 95% for the validation and 92% and 81% for the test set. The Cohen's kappa between the neural network and the reference judgements were 0.79 and 0.72 for the validation and test sets with an absolute agreement of 90% and 88%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep artificial neural networks enable the accurate detection of definite radiographic sacroiliitis relevant for the diagnosis and classification of axSpA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51225,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Research & Therapy","volume":"23 1","pages":"106"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8028815/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning for detection of radiographic sacroiliitis: achieving expert-level performance.\",\"authors\":\"Keno K Bressem, Janis L Vahldiek, Lisa Adams, Stefan Markus Niehues, Hildrun Haibel, Valeria Rios Rodriguez, Murat Torgutalp, Mikhail Protopopov, Fabian Proft, Judith Rademacher, Joachim Sieper, Martin Rudwaleit, Bernd Hamm, Marcus R Makowski, Kay-Geert Hermann, Denis Poddubnyy\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13075-021-02484-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiographs of the sacroiliac joints are commonly used for the diagnosis and classification of axial spondyloarthritis. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an artificial neural network for the detection of definite radiographic sacroiliitis as a manifestation of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conventional radiographs of the sacroiliac joints obtained in two independent studies of patients with axSpA were used. The first cohort comprised 1553 radiographs and was split into training (n = 1324) and validation (n = 229) sets. The second cohort comprised 458 radiographs and was used as an independent test dataset. All radiographs were assessed in a central reading session, and the final decision on the presence or absence of definite radiographic sacroiliitis was used as a reference. The performance of the neural network was evaluated by calculating areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) as well as sensitivity and specificity. Cohen's kappa and the absolute agreement were used to assess the agreement between the neural network and the human readers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The neural network achieved an excellent performance in the detection of definite radiographic sacroiliitis with an AUC of 0.97 and 0.94 for the validation and test datasets, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for the cut-off weighting both measurements equally were 88% and 95% for the validation and 92% and 81% for the test set. The Cohen's kappa between the neural network and the reference judgements were 0.79 and 0.72 for the validation and test sets with an absolute agreement of 90% and 88%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep artificial neural networks enable the accurate detection of definite radiographic sacroiliitis relevant for the diagnosis and classification of axSpA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis Research & Therapy\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8028815/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis Research & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02484-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02484-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骶髂关节的X光片通常用于轴性脊柱关节炎的诊断和分类。本研究的目的是开发并验证一种人工神经网络,用于检测作为轴性脊柱关节炎(axSpA)一种表现形式的明确骶髂关节炎的影像学表现:研究使用了两项独立研究中获得的骶髂关节常规X光片,研究对象均为轴性骶髂关节炎(axSpA)患者。第一组包括1553张X光片,分为训练集(n = 1324)和验证集(n = 229)。第二组包括 458 张射线照片,用作独立的测试数据集。所有射线照片均在中央读片会议上进行评估,并以最终判定是否存在明确的放射性骶髂关节炎作为参考。通过计算接收器工作特征曲线下的面积(AUC)以及灵敏度和特异性来评估神经网络的性能。科恩卡帕(Cohen's kappa)和绝对一致性用于评估神经网络与人类读者之间的一致性:结果:神经网络在检测明确的放射性骶髂关节炎方面表现出色,验证数据集和测试数据集的AUC分别为0.97和0.94。对于两种测量值权重相同的临界值,验证数据集的灵敏度和特异度分别为 88% 和 95%,测试数据集的灵敏度和特异度分别为 92% 和 81%。在验证集和测试集上,神经网络与参考判断之间的科恩卡帕值分别为 0.79 和 0.72,绝对一致度分别为 90% 和 88%:结论:深度人工神经网络能准确检测出明确的放射性骶髂关节炎,这与 axSpA 的诊断和分类有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Deep learning for detection of radiographic sacroiliitis: achieving expert-level performance.

Deep learning for detection of radiographic sacroiliitis: achieving expert-level performance.

Deep learning for detection of radiographic sacroiliitis: achieving expert-level performance.

Deep learning for detection of radiographic sacroiliitis: achieving expert-level performance.

Background: Radiographs of the sacroiliac joints are commonly used for the diagnosis and classification of axial spondyloarthritis. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an artificial neural network for the detection of definite radiographic sacroiliitis as a manifestation of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

Methods: Conventional radiographs of the sacroiliac joints obtained in two independent studies of patients with axSpA were used. The first cohort comprised 1553 radiographs and was split into training (n = 1324) and validation (n = 229) sets. The second cohort comprised 458 radiographs and was used as an independent test dataset. All radiographs were assessed in a central reading session, and the final decision on the presence or absence of definite radiographic sacroiliitis was used as a reference. The performance of the neural network was evaluated by calculating areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) as well as sensitivity and specificity. Cohen's kappa and the absolute agreement were used to assess the agreement between the neural network and the human readers.

Results: The neural network achieved an excellent performance in the detection of definite radiographic sacroiliitis with an AUC of 0.97 and 0.94 for the validation and test datasets, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for the cut-off weighting both measurements equally were 88% and 95% for the validation and 92% and 81% for the test set. The Cohen's kappa between the neural network and the reference judgements were 0.79 and 0.72 for the validation and test sets with an absolute agreement of 90% and 88%, respectively.

Conclusion: Deep artificial neural networks enable the accurate detection of definite radiographic sacroiliitis relevant for the diagnosis and classification of axSpA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Established in 1999, Arthritis Research and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed journal, publishing original articles in the area of musculoskeletal research and therapy as well as, reviews, commentaries and reports. A major focus of the journal is on the immunologic processes leading to inflammation, damage and repair as they relate to autoimmune rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions, and which inform the translation of this knowledge into advances in clinical care. Original basic, translational and clinical research is considered for publication along with results of early and late phase therapeutic trials, especially as they pertain to the underpinning science that informs clinical observations in interventional studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信