药物抽样是否能提高简单建议的依从性?一项实用的随机临床试验的结果。

IF 1.2 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Journal of Smoking Cessation Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-16 DOI:10.1155/2021/6638872
Nathaniel J Silvestri, Jennifer Dahne, Amy E Wahlquist, Benjamin Toll, Matthew J Carpenter
{"title":"药物抽样是否能提高简单建议的依从性?一项实用的随机临床试验的结果。","authors":"Nathaniel J Silvestri,&nbsp;Jennifer Dahne,&nbsp;Amy E Wahlquist,&nbsp;Benjamin Toll,&nbsp;Matthew J Carpenter","doi":"10.1155/2021/6638872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 5As model is a standard component of most guidelines for tobacco treatment. Unfortunately, provider adherence to this model is modest.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Providing physicians with adjunctive tools to adhere to 5As guidelines may serve as a catalyst for brief advice delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary data analysis of a cluster randomized clinical trial assessing the uptake and impact of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) sampling versus standard care in primary care. Patients reported receipt of separate elements of the 5As model, assessed one month following a baseline visit. Analyses compared patients who recalled receipt of brief advice among those who received NRT vs. standard care. Additional analyses examined demographic predictors of receiving brief advice.</p><p><strong>Results/findings: </strong>Medication sampling did not improve compliance with ask, advise, or assess. Receipt of \"assistance\" was significantly higher among NRT recipients (70%) (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001). The NRT sampling group was more likely to have received all components (<i>p</i> = 0.004). As age increased, being asked (<i>p</i> = 0.006), advised (<i>p</i> = 0.05), and assessed (<i>p</i> = 0.003) decreased. Non-Whites reported higher rates of assessment (<i>p</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Provision of NRT sampling increased provider compliance with some elements of the brief advice model, thus enhancing the impact of cessation advice within primary care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02096029.</p>","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023690/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Medication Sampling Improve Compliance with Brief Advice? Results from a Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nathaniel J Silvestri,&nbsp;Jennifer Dahne,&nbsp;Amy E Wahlquist,&nbsp;Benjamin Toll,&nbsp;Matthew J Carpenter\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2021/6638872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 5As model is a standard component of most guidelines for tobacco treatment. Unfortunately, provider adherence to this model is modest.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Providing physicians with adjunctive tools to adhere to 5As guidelines may serve as a catalyst for brief advice delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary data analysis of a cluster randomized clinical trial assessing the uptake and impact of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) sampling versus standard care in primary care. Patients reported receipt of separate elements of the 5As model, assessed one month following a baseline visit. Analyses compared patients who recalled receipt of brief advice among those who received NRT vs. standard care. Additional analyses examined demographic predictors of receiving brief advice.</p><p><strong>Results/findings: </strong>Medication sampling did not improve compliance with ask, advise, or assess. Receipt of \\\"assistance\\\" was significantly higher among NRT recipients (70%) (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001). The NRT sampling group was more likely to have received all components (<i>p</i> = 0.004). As age increased, being asked (<i>p</i> = 0.006), advised (<i>p</i> = 0.05), and assessed (<i>p</i> = 0.003) decreased. Non-Whites reported higher rates of assessment (<i>p</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Provision of NRT sampling increased provider compliance with some elements of the brief advice model, thus enhancing the impact of cessation advice within primary care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02096029.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Smoking Cessation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023690/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Smoking Cessation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6638872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/3/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6638872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

5As模型是大多数烟草治疗指南的标准组成部分。不幸的是,提供者对该模型的遵守程度并不高。目的:为医生提供辅助工具来坚持5As指南,可以作为简短建议交付的催化剂。方法:这是一项集群随机临床试验的二次数据分析,评估初级保健中游离尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)抽样与标准治疗的吸收和影响。患者报告收到了5As模型的单独元素,在基线访问后一个月进行评估。分析比较了接受NRT和标准治疗的患者中回忆接受简短建议的患者。另外的分析检查了接受简短建议的人口预测因素。结果/发现:药物抽样并没有提高询问、建议或评估的依从性。NRT受助人中接受“援助”的比例明显更高(70%)(p≤0.0001)。NRT采样组更有可能获得所有组件(p = 0.004)。随着年龄的增加,被询问(p = 0.006)、建议(p = 0.05)和评估(p = 0.003)的比例下降。非白人的评估率更高(p = 0.02)。结论:提供NRT抽样增加了提供者对简短建议模型的某些要素的依从性,从而增强了戒烟建议在初级保健中的影响。试验注册:该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册NCT02096029。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Medication Sampling Improve Compliance with Brief Advice? Results from a Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial.

Introduction: The 5As model is a standard component of most guidelines for tobacco treatment. Unfortunately, provider adherence to this model is modest.

Aims: Providing physicians with adjunctive tools to adhere to 5As guidelines may serve as a catalyst for brief advice delivery.

Methods: This was a secondary data analysis of a cluster randomized clinical trial assessing the uptake and impact of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) sampling versus standard care in primary care. Patients reported receipt of separate elements of the 5As model, assessed one month following a baseline visit. Analyses compared patients who recalled receipt of brief advice among those who received NRT vs. standard care. Additional analyses examined demographic predictors of receiving brief advice.

Results/findings: Medication sampling did not improve compliance with ask, advise, or assess. Receipt of "assistance" was significantly higher among NRT recipients (70%) (p ≤ 0.0001). The NRT sampling group was more likely to have received all components (p = 0.004). As age increased, being asked (p = 0.006), advised (p = 0.05), and assessed (p = 0.003) decreased. Non-Whites reported higher rates of assessment (p = 0.02).

Conclusions: Provision of NRT sampling increased provider compliance with some elements of the brief advice model, thus enhancing the impact of cessation advice within primary care.

Trial registration: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02096029.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Smoking Cessation
Journal of Smoking Cessation Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信