腹膜透析命令客观结构化临床检查(OSCE):肾病学研究员的形成性评估。

Lisa K Prince, Brian C Y'Barbo, Robert Nee, Christina M Yuan
{"title":"腹膜透析命令客观结构化临床检查(OSCE):肾病学研究员的形成性评估。","authors":"Lisa K Prince,&nbsp;Brian C Y'Barbo,&nbsp;Robert Nee,&nbsp;Christina M Yuan","doi":"10.1177/08968608211000542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peritoneal dialysis (PD) management is a fundamental nephrology skill, especially with the recent emphasis on home dialysis. We report a prospective multicentre cohort study of a formative objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) assessing competence in managing PD-associated bacterial peritonitis, using the unified model of construct validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The OSCE was developed by the principal investigators and reviewed by two subject matter experts. The test committee (eight nephrologists and one PD nurse) assessed test item difficulty/relevance and determined passing score. There were 22 test items (7 evidence-based/standard-of-care questions). Passing score was 16/22 (73%). No item had median relevance less than 'important', and all were easy to medium difficulty. Content validity index was 0.91. Preliminary validation (16 board-certified volunteers): mean score was 19 ± 2, with 94% (15/16) passing. Kappa = 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.94]. Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.70.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-seven fellows (16 programmes) were tested; 67% passed. Fellows scored significantly less than validators: 17 ± 3 versus 19 ± 2, <i>p</i> < 0.001 [95% CI 1.2-3.6]. Eighty-six per cent of evidence-based/standard-of-care questions were answered correctly by validators versus 54% by fellows; <i>p</i> < 0.001. Ninety-three per cent of fellows recognized that sufficient criteria were present to diagnose peritonitis, but only 17% correctly indicated all three. Seventy-seven per cent recognized peritonitis-associated ultrafiltration failure, but only 17% prescribed 21 days of antibiotic treatment for gram-negative peritonitis. Eighty-five per cent of fellows surveyed agreed/strongly agreed that the OSCE was useful in self-assessing proficiency. Second-year in-training examination and OSCE scores were positively correlated (Pearson's <i>r</i> = 0.57, <i>p</i> < 0.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The OSCE may be used to formatively assess fellow proficiency in managing PD-associated peritonitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":519220,"journal":{"name":"Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis","volume":" ","pages":"472-479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/08968608211000542","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The peritoneal dialysis orders objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): A formative assessment for nephrology fellows.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa K Prince,&nbsp;Brian C Y'Barbo,&nbsp;Robert Nee,&nbsp;Christina M Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08968608211000542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peritoneal dialysis (PD) management is a fundamental nephrology skill, especially with the recent emphasis on home dialysis. We report a prospective multicentre cohort study of a formative objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) assessing competence in managing PD-associated bacterial peritonitis, using the unified model of construct validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The OSCE was developed by the principal investigators and reviewed by two subject matter experts. The test committee (eight nephrologists and one PD nurse) assessed test item difficulty/relevance and determined passing score. There were 22 test items (7 evidence-based/standard-of-care questions). Passing score was 16/22 (73%). No item had median relevance less than 'important', and all were easy to medium difficulty. Content validity index was 0.91. Preliminary validation (16 board-certified volunteers): mean score was 19 ± 2, with 94% (15/16) passing. Kappa = 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.94]. Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.70.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-seven fellows (16 programmes) were tested; 67% passed. Fellows scored significantly less than validators: 17 ± 3 versus 19 ± 2, <i>p</i> < 0.001 [95% CI 1.2-3.6]. Eighty-six per cent of evidence-based/standard-of-care questions were answered correctly by validators versus 54% by fellows; <i>p</i> < 0.001. Ninety-three per cent of fellows recognized that sufficient criteria were present to diagnose peritonitis, but only 17% correctly indicated all three. Seventy-seven per cent recognized peritonitis-associated ultrafiltration failure, but only 17% prescribed 21 days of antibiotic treatment for gram-negative peritonitis. Eighty-five per cent of fellows surveyed agreed/strongly agreed that the OSCE was useful in self-assessing proficiency. Second-year in-training examination and OSCE scores were positively correlated (Pearson's <i>r</i> = 0.57, <i>p</i> < 0.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The OSCE may be used to formatively assess fellow proficiency in managing PD-associated peritonitis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"472-479\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/08968608211000542\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608211000542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/3/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608211000542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:腹膜透析(PD)管理是一项基本的肾脏学技能,特别是最近强调家庭透析。我们报告了一项前瞻性多中心队列研究,该研究采用统一的结构效度模型,对形成性客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)评估pd相关细菌性腹膜炎管理能力进行了评估。方法:欧安组织由主要研究人员制定,并由两名主题专家审查。测试委员会(8名肾病学家和1名PD护士)评估测试项目的难度/相关性并确定及格分数。共有22个测试项目(7个循证/标准护理问题)。合格率16/22(73%)。没有一个项目的中值相关性低于“重要”,所有项目都是简单到中等难度的。内容效度指数为0.91。初步验证(16名委员会认证志愿者):平均得分19±2分,94%(15/16)通过。Kappa = 0.85[95%置信区间(CI) 0.77-0.94]。Cronbach’s α = 0.70。结果:87名研究员(16个项目)接受了测试;67%通过。研究员的得分明显低于验证者:17±3比19±2,p < 0.001 [95% CI 1.2-3.6]。验证者正确回答了86%的循证/标准护理问题,而研究员正确回答了54%;P < 0.001。93%的研究人员认识到有足够的标准来诊断腹膜炎,但只有17%的人正确地指出了所有三个标准。77%的医生诊断为腹膜炎相关的超滤功能衰竭,但只有17%的医生为革兰氏阴性腹膜炎开出了21天的抗生素治疗处方。85%接受调查的研究员同意/强烈同意欧安组织在自我评估熟练程度方面是有用的。第二年培训考试成绩与OSCE成绩呈正相关(Pearson’s r = 0.57, p < 0.00)。结论:OSCE可用于形成性评估同事在处理pd相关性腹膜炎方面的熟练程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The peritoneal dialysis orders objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): A formative assessment for nephrology fellows.

Background: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) management is a fundamental nephrology skill, especially with the recent emphasis on home dialysis. We report a prospective multicentre cohort study of a formative objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) assessing competence in managing PD-associated bacterial peritonitis, using the unified model of construct validity.

Methods: The OSCE was developed by the principal investigators and reviewed by two subject matter experts. The test committee (eight nephrologists and one PD nurse) assessed test item difficulty/relevance and determined passing score. There were 22 test items (7 evidence-based/standard-of-care questions). Passing score was 16/22 (73%). No item had median relevance less than 'important', and all were easy to medium difficulty. Content validity index was 0.91. Preliminary validation (16 board-certified volunteers): mean score was 19 ± 2, with 94% (15/16) passing. Kappa = 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.94]. Cronbach's α = 0.70.

Results: Eighty-seven fellows (16 programmes) were tested; 67% passed. Fellows scored significantly less than validators: 17 ± 3 versus 19 ± 2, p < 0.001 [95% CI 1.2-3.6]. Eighty-six per cent of evidence-based/standard-of-care questions were answered correctly by validators versus 54% by fellows; p < 0.001. Ninety-three per cent of fellows recognized that sufficient criteria were present to diagnose peritonitis, but only 17% correctly indicated all three. Seventy-seven per cent recognized peritonitis-associated ultrafiltration failure, but only 17% prescribed 21 days of antibiotic treatment for gram-negative peritonitis. Eighty-five per cent of fellows surveyed agreed/strongly agreed that the OSCE was useful in self-assessing proficiency. Second-year in-training examination and OSCE scores were positively correlated (Pearson's r = 0.57, p < 0.00).

Conclusions: The OSCE may be used to formatively assess fellow proficiency in managing PD-associated peritonitis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信