意义在视觉工作记忆中的作用:现实世界的物体,而不是简单的特征,受益于更深层次的处理。

Timothy F Brady, Viola S Störmer
{"title":"意义在视觉工作记忆中的作用:现实世界的物体,而不是简单的特征,受益于更深层次的处理。","authors":"Timothy F Brady,&nbsp;Viola S Störmer","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visual working memory is a capacity-limited cognitive system used to actively store and manipulate visual information. Visual working memory capacity is not fixed, but varies by stimulus type: Stimuli that are more meaningful are better remembered. In the current work, we investigate what conditions lead to the strongest benefits for meaningful stimuli. We propose that in some situations participants may try to encode the entire display holistically (i.e., in a quick \"snapshot\"). This may lead them to treat objects as simply meaningless, colored \"blobs\", rather than individually and in a high-level way, which could reduce benefits of meaningful stimuli. In a series of experiments, we directly test whether real-world objects, colors, perceptually matched less-meaningful objects, and fully scrambled objects benefit from deeper processing. We systematically vary the presentation format of stimuli at encoding to be either simultaneous-encouraging a parallel, \"take-a-quick-snapshot\" strategy-or present the stimuli sequentially, promoting a serial, each-item-at-once strategy. We find large advantages for meaningful objects in all conditions, but find that real-world objects-and to a lesser degree lightly scrambled, still meaningful versions of the objects-benefit from the sequential encoding and thus deeper, focused-on-individual-items processing, while colors do not. Our results suggest single-feature objects may be an outlier in their affordance of parallel, quick processing, and that in more realistic memory situations, visual working memory likely relies upon representations resulting from in-depth processing of objects (e.g., in higher-level visual areas) rather than solely being represented in terms of their low-level features. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":504300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"942-958"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of meaning in visual working memory: Real-world objects, but not simple features, benefit from deeper processing.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy F Brady,&nbsp;Viola S Störmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xlm0001014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Visual working memory is a capacity-limited cognitive system used to actively store and manipulate visual information. Visual working memory capacity is not fixed, but varies by stimulus type: Stimuli that are more meaningful are better remembered. In the current work, we investigate what conditions lead to the strongest benefits for meaningful stimuli. We propose that in some situations participants may try to encode the entire display holistically (i.e., in a quick \\\"snapshot\\\"). This may lead them to treat objects as simply meaningless, colored \\\"blobs\\\", rather than individually and in a high-level way, which could reduce benefits of meaningful stimuli. In a series of experiments, we directly test whether real-world objects, colors, perceptually matched less-meaningful objects, and fully scrambled objects benefit from deeper processing. We systematically vary the presentation format of stimuli at encoding to be either simultaneous-encouraging a parallel, \\\"take-a-quick-snapshot\\\" strategy-or present the stimuli sequentially, promoting a serial, each-item-at-once strategy. We find large advantages for meaningful objects in all conditions, but find that real-world objects-and to a lesser degree lightly scrambled, still meaningful versions of the objects-benefit from the sequential encoding and thus deeper, focused-on-individual-items processing, while colors do not. Our results suggest single-feature objects may be an outlier in their affordance of parallel, quick processing, and that in more realistic memory situations, visual working memory likely relies upon representations resulting from in-depth processing of objects (e.g., in higher-level visual areas) rather than solely being represented in terms of their low-level features. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":504300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"942-958\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/3/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

视觉工作记忆是一种容量有限的认知系统,用于主动存储和处理视觉信息。视觉工作记忆的容量不是固定的,而是随着刺激类型的不同而变化:更有意义的刺激会被更好地记住。在目前的工作中,我们研究了什么条件会导致有意义的刺激产生最大的好处。我们建议,在某些情况下,参与者可能会尝试对整个显示器进行整体编码(即,在快速“快照”中)。这可能会导致他们将物体简单地视为无意义的彩色“斑点”,而不是以一种高层次的方式单独对待,这可能会降低有意义刺激的好处。在一系列实验中,我们直接测试了现实世界的物体、颜色、感知上匹配的意义较小的物体和完全打乱的物体是否从深度处理中受益。我们系统地改变了刺激在编码时的呈现形式,要么是同时的——鼓励平行的,“快速快照”的策略——要么是顺序地呈现刺激,促进连续的,一次每个项目的策略。我们发现有意义的对象在所有条件下都有很大的优势,但发现现实世界的对象——在较小程度上稍微打乱,仍然有意义的对象——受益于顺序编码,因此更深入,专注于单个项目的处理,而颜色则没有。我们的研究结果表明,单一特征的对象在并行、快速处理的能力上可能是一个异常值,并且在更现实的记忆情况下,视觉工作记忆可能依赖于对对象的深度处理(例如,在更高层次的视觉区域)产生的表征,而不是仅仅根据它们的低级特征进行表征。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of meaning in visual working memory: Real-world objects, but not simple features, benefit from deeper processing.

Visual working memory is a capacity-limited cognitive system used to actively store and manipulate visual information. Visual working memory capacity is not fixed, but varies by stimulus type: Stimuli that are more meaningful are better remembered. In the current work, we investigate what conditions lead to the strongest benefits for meaningful stimuli. We propose that in some situations participants may try to encode the entire display holistically (i.e., in a quick "snapshot"). This may lead them to treat objects as simply meaningless, colored "blobs", rather than individually and in a high-level way, which could reduce benefits of meaningful stimuli. In a series of experiments, we directly test whether real-world objects, colors, perceptually matched less-meaningful objects, and fully scrambled objects benefit from deeper processing. We systematically vary the presentation format of stimuli at encoding to be either simultaneous-encouraging a parallel, "take-a-quick-snapshot" strategy-or present the stimuli sequentially, promoting a serial, each-item-at-once strategy. We find large advantages for meaningful objects in all conditions, but find that real-world objects-and to a lesser degree lightly scrambled, still meaningful versions of the objects-benefit from the sequential encoding and thus deeper, focused-on-individual-items processing, while colors do not. Our results suggest single-feature objects may be an outlier in their affordance of parallel, quick processing, and that in more realistic memory situations, visual working memory likely relies upon representations resulting from in-depth processing of objects (e.g., in higher-level visual areas) rather than solely being represented in terms of their low-level features. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信