Stephanie Bartlett, Lyle P Fettig, Peter H Baenziger, Eliana N DiOrio, Kayla M Herget, Lynn D'Cruz, Johanna R Coughlin, Mikaela Lake, Amy Truong, Amber R Comer
{"title":"印第安纳州医学住院医师对代理决策法的了解。","authors":"Stephanie Bartlett, Lyle P Fettig, Peter H Baenziger, Eliana N DiOrio, Kayla M Herget, Lynn D'Cruz, Johanna R Coughlin, Mikaela Lake, Amy Truong, Amber R Comer","doi":"10.1177/0272684X211004737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During the care of incapacitated patients, physicians, and medical residents discuss treatment options and gain consent to treat through healthcare surrogates. The purpose of this study is to ascertain medical residents' knowledge of healthcare consent laws, application during clinical practice, and appraise the education residents received regarding surrogate decision making laws.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Beginning in February of 2018, 35 of 113 medical residents working with patients within Indiana completed a survey. The survey explored medical residents' knowledge of health care surrogate consent laws utilized in Indiana hospitals and Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals via clinical vignettes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 22.9% of medical residents knew the default state law in Indiana did not have a hierarchy for settling disputes among surrogates. Medical residents correctly identified which family members could participate in medical decisions 86% of the time. Under the Veterans Affairs surrogate law, medical residents correctly identified appropriate family members or friends 50% of the time and incorrectly acknowledged the chief decision makers during a dispute 30% of the time. All medical residents report only having little or some knowledge of surrogate decision making laws with only 43% having remembered receiving surrogate decision making training during their residency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate that medical residents lack understanding of surrogate decision making laws. In order to ensure medical decisions are made by the appropriate surrogates and patient autonomy is upheld, an educational intervention is required to train medical residents about surrogate decision making laws and how they are used in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54184,"journal":{"name":"International Quarterly of Community Health Education","volume":" ","pages":"272684X211004737"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indiana Medical Resident's Knowledge of Surrogate Decision Making Laws.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Bartlett, Lyle P Fettig, Peter H Baenziger, Eliana N DiOrio, Kayla M Herget, Lynn D'Cruz, Johanna R Coughlin, Mikaela Lake, Amy Truong, Amber R Comer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0272684X211004737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During the care of incapacitated patients, physicians, and medical residents discuss treatment options and gain consent to treat through healthcare surrogates. The purpose of this study is to ascertain medical residents' knowledge of healthcare consent laws, application during clinical practice, and appraise the education residents received regarding surrogate decision making laws.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Beginning in February of 2018, 35 of 113 medical residents working with patients within Indiana completed a survey. The survey explored medical residents' knowledge of health care surrogate consent laws utilized in Indiana hospitals and Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals via clinical vignettes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 22.9% of medical residents knew the default state law in Indiana did not have a hierarchy for settling disputes among surrogates. Medical residents correctly identified which family members could participate in medical decisions 86% of the time. Under the Veterans Affairs surrogate law, medical residents correctly identified appropriate family members or friends 50% of the time and incorrectly acknowledged the chief decision makers during a dispute 30% of the time. All medical residents report only having little or some knowledge of surrogate decision making laws with only 43% having remembered receiving surrogate decision making training during their residency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate that medical residents lack understanding of surrogate decision making laws. In order to ensure medical decisions are made by the appropriate surrogates and patient autonomy is upheld, an educational intervention is required to train medical residents about surrogate decision making laws and how they are used in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Quarterly of Community Health Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"272684X211004737\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Quarterly of Community Health Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272684X211004737\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Quarterly of Community Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272684X211004737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Indiana Medical Resident's Knowledge of Surrogate Decision Making Laws.
Introduction: During the care of incapacitated patients, physicians, and medical residents discuss treatment options and gain consent to treat through healthcare surrogates. The purpose of this study is to ascertain medical residents' knowledge of healthcare consent laws, application during clinical practice, and appraise the education residents received regarding surrogate decision making laws.
Methods: Beginning in February of 2018, 35 of 113 medical residents working with patients within Indiana completed a survey. The survey explored medical residents' knowledge of health care surrogate consent laws utilized in Indiana hospitals and Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals via clinical vignettes.
Results: Only 22.9% of medical residents knew the default state law in Indiana did not have a hierarchy for settling disputes among surrogates. Medical residents correctly identified which family members could participate in medical decisions 86% of the time. Under the Veterans Affairs surrogate law, medical residents correctly identified appropriate family members or friends 50% of the time and incorrectly acknowledged the chief decision makers during a dispute 30% of the time. All medical residents report only having little or some knowledge of surrogate decision making laws with only 43% having remembered receiving surrogate decision making training during their residency.
Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that medical residents lack understanding of surrogate decision making laws. In order to ensure medical decisions are made by the appropriate surrogates and patient autonomy is upheld, an educational intervention is required to train medical residents about surrogate decision making laws and how they are used in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
The International Quarterly of Community Health Education is committed to publishing applied research, policy and case studies dealing with community health education and its relationship to social change. Since 1981, this rigorously peer-referred Journal has contained a wide selection of material in readable style and format by contributors who are not only authorities in their field, but can also write with vigor, clarity, and occasionally with humor. Since its introduction the Journal has considered all manuscripts, especially encouraging stimulating articles which manage to combine maximum readability with scholarly standards.