探索在基于团队的学习(TBL)中使用极简答题(VSAQs)的可行性。

The clinical teacher Pub Date : 2021-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-24 DOI:10.1111/tct.13347
Kate R Millar, Michael D Reid, Preman Rajalingam, Claire A Canning, Omid Halse, Naomi Low-Beer, Amir H Sam
{"title":"探索在基于团队的学习(TBL)中使用极简答题(VSAQs)的可行性。","authors":"Kate R Millar,&nbsp;Michael D Reid,&nbsp;Preman Rajalingam,&nbsp;Claire A Canning,&nbsp;Omid Halse,&nbsp;Naomi Low-Beer,&nbsp;Amir H Sam","doi":"10.1111/tct.13347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Team-based learning (TBL) currently relies on single best answer questions (SBAQs) to provide immediate feedback. Very short answer questions (VSAQs) are a reliable and discriminatory alternative that encourage learners to use more authentic clinical reasoning strategies compared to SBAQs. However, the challenge of marking VSAQs has limited their integration into TBL; we therefore explored the feasibility of VSAQs within a TBL session.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online platform was developed to allow immediate marking of VSAQs during the TBL sessions. As part of the readiness assurance process, students completed VSAQs and SBAQs, which were marked in real time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Instructors were able to mark all VSAQs during the individual readiness assurance test (iRAT), which facilitated the provision of immediate feedback during the team readiness assurance test (tRAT). The mean time to mark five VSAQs was 422 seconds (SD 73 seconds). For VSAQs, the number of attempts to reach the correct answer ranged from 1 to 38, compared to 1 to 4 for SBAQs. In total, 71.6% of students agreed that using VSAQs in TBL helped to emphasise group discussions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The wide range of attempts at, and students' perspectives of VSAQs are suggestive of their positive impact on student discussion during TBL. We demonstrate how new technology allows VSAQs to be feasibly integrated into TBL with the potential to enrich group discussions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74987,"journal":{"name":"The clinical teacher","volume":"18 4","pages":"404-408"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/tct.13347","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the feasibility of using very short answer questions (VSAQs) in team-based learning (TBL).\",\"authors\":\"Kate R Millar,&nbsp;Michael D Reid,&nbsp;Preman Rajalingam,&nbsp;Claire A Canning,&nbsp;Omid Halse,&nbsp;Naomi Low-Beer,&nbsp;Amir H Sam\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tct.13347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Team-based learning (TBL) currently relies on single best answer questions (SBAQs) to provide immediate feedback. Very short answer questions (VSAQs) are a reliable and discriminatory alternative that encourage learners to use more authentic clinical reasoning strategies compared to SBAQs. However, the challenge of marking VSAQs has limited their integration into TBL; we therefore explored the feasibility of VSAQs within a TBL session.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online platform was developed to allow immediate marking of VSAQs during the TBL sessions. As part of the readiness assurance process, students completed VSAQs and SBAQs, which were marked in real time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Instructors were able to mark all VSAQs during the individual readiness assurance test (iRAT), which facilitated the provision of immediate feedback during the team readiness assurance test (tRAT). The mean time to mark five VSAQs was 422 seconds (SD 73 seconds). For VSAQs, the number of attempts to reach the correct answer ranged from 1 to 38, compared to 1 to 4 for SBAQs. In total, 71.6% of students agreed that using VSAQs in TBL helped to emphasise group discussions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The wide range of attempts at, and students' perspectives of VSAQs are suggestive of their positive impact on student discussion during TBL. We demonstrate how new technology allows VSAQs to be feasibly integrated into TBL with the potential to enrich group discussions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The clinical teacher\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"404-408\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/tct.13347\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The clinical teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/3/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The clinical teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:基于团队的学习(TBL)目前依赖于单一最佳答案问题(sbaq)来提供即时反馈。与sbaq相比,vsaq是一种可靠且具有歧视性的选择,它鼓励学习者使用更真实的临床推理策略。然而,标记vsaq的挑战限制了它们与TBL的整合;因此,我们探讨了在TBL会议中进行vsaq的可行性。方法:开发了一个在线平台,允许在TBL会议期间立即标记vsaq。作为准备保证过程的一部分,学生们完成了VSAQs和SBAQs,并进行了实时标记。结果:教师能够在个人准备保证测试(iRAT)中标记所有vsaq,这有助于在团队准备保证测试(tRAT)中提供即时反馈。标记5个VSAQs的平均时间为422秒(SD 73秒)。对于vsaq,尝试找到正确答案的次数在1到38次之间,而sbaq是1到4次。总的来说,71.6%的学生认为在TBL中使用vsaq有助于强调小组讨论。讨论:vsaq的广泛尝试和学生的观点表明它们对学生在TBL中的讨论产生了积极的影响。我们展示了新技术如何使vsaq可行地集成到TBL中,并有可能丰富小组讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the feasibility of using very short answer questions (VSAQs) in team-based learning (TBL).

Background: Team-based learning (TBL) currently relies on single best answer questions (SBAQs) to provide immediate feedback. Very short answer questions (VSAQs) are a reliable and discriminatory alternative that encourage learners to use more authentic clinical reasoning strategies compared to SBAQs. However, the challenge of marking VSAQs has limited their integration into TBL; we therefore explored the feasibility of VSAQs within a TBL session.

Methods: An online platform was developed to allow immediate marking of VSAQs during the TBL sessions. As part of the readiness assurance process, students completed VSAQs and SBAQs, which were marked in real time.

Results: Instructors were able to mark all VSAQs during the individual readiness assurance test (iRAT), which facilitated the provision of immediate feedback during the team readiness assurance test (tRAT). The mean time to mark five VSAQs was 422 seconds (SD 73 seconds). For VSAQs, the number of attempts to reach the correct answer ranged from 1 to 38, compared to 1 to 4 for SBAQs. In total, 71.6% of students agreed that using VSAQs in TBL helped to emphasise group discussions.

Discussion: The wide range of attempts at, and students' perspectives of VSAQs are suggestive of their positive impact on student discussion during TBL. We demonstrate how new technology allows VSAQs to be feasibly integrated into TBL with the potential to enrich group discussions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信