{"title":"高水平电子病历采用与医院人员配备水平之间的相互作用:关注基于价值的采购。","authors":"Kate Jiayi Li, Mona Al-Amin","doi":"10.1177/09514848211001696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to understand the relationship of hospital performance with high-level electronic medical record (EMR) adoption, hospitalists staffing levels, and their potential interaction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We evaluated 2,699 non-federal, general acute hospitals using 2016 data merged from four data sources. We performed ordinal logistic regression of hospitals' total performance score (TPS) on their EMR capability and hospitalists staffing level while controlling for other market- and individual-level characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospitalists staffing level is shown to be positively correlated with TPS. High-level EMR adoption is associated with both short-term and long-term improvement on TPS. Large, urban, non-federal government hospitals, and academic medical centers tend to have lower TPS compared to their respective counterparts. Hospitals belonging to medium- or large-sized healthcare systems have lower TPS. Higher registered nurse (RN) staffing level is associated with higher TPS, while higher percentage of Medicare or Medicaid share of inpatient days is associated with lower TPS.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although the main effects of hospitalists staffing level and EMR capability are significant, their interaction is not, suggesting that hospitalists and EMR act through separate mechanisms to help hospitals achieve better performance. When hospitals are not able to invest on both simultaneously, given financial constraints, they can still reap the full benefits from each.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hospitalists staffing level and EMR capability are both positively correlated with hospitals' TPS, and they act independently to bolster hospital performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":45801,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Management Research","volume":"35 2","pages":"66-73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/09514848211001696","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The interaction between high-level electronic medical record adoption and hospitalist staffing levels: A focus on value-based purchasing.\",\"authors\":\"Kate Jiayi Li, Mona Al-Amin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09514848211001696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to understand the relationship of hospital performance with high-level electronic medical record (EMR) adoption, hospitalists staffing levels, and their potential interaction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We evaluated 2,699 non-federal, general acute hospitals using 2016 data merged from four data sources. We performed ordinal logistic regression of hospitals' total performance score (TPS) on their EMR capability and hospitalists staffing level while controlling for other market- and individual-level characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospitalists staffing level is shown to be positively correlated with TPS. High-level EMR adoption is associated with both short-term and long-term improvement on TPS. Large, urban, non-federal government hospitals, and academic medical centers tend to have lower TPS compared to their respective counterparts. Hospitals belonging to medium- or large-sized healthcare systems have lower TPS. Higher registered nurse (RN) staffing level is associated with higher TPS, while higher percentage of Medicare or Medicaid share of inpatient days is associated with lower TPS.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although the main effects of hospitalists staffing level and EMR capability are significant, their interaction is not, suggesting that hospitalists and EMR act through separate mechanisms to help hospitals achieve better performance. When hospitals are not able to invest on both simultaneously, given financial constraints, they can still reap the full benefits from each.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hospitalists staffing level and EMR capability are both positively correlated with hospitals' TPS, and they act independently to bolster hospital performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Management Research\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"66-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/09514848211001696\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Management Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848211001696\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/3/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848211001696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The interaction between high-level electronic medical record adoption and hospitalist staffing levels: A focus on value-based purchasing.
Objective: This study sought to understand the relationship of hospital performance with high-level electronic medical record (EMR) adoption, hospitalists staffing levels, and their potential interaction.
Materials and methods: We evaluated 2,699 non-federal, general acute hospitals using 2016 data merged from four data sources. We performed ordinal logistic regression of hospitals' total performance score (TPS) on their EMR capability and hospitalists staffing level while controlling for other market- and individual-level characteristics.
Results: Hospitalists staffing level is shown to be positively correlated with TPS. High-level EMR adoption is associated with both short-term and long-term improvement on TPS. Large, urban, non-federal government hospitals, and academic medical centers tend to have lower TPS compared to their respective counterparts. Hospitals belonging to medium- or large-sized healthcare systems have lower TPS. Higher registered nurse (RN) staffing level is associated with higher TPS, while higher percentage of Medicare or Medicaid share of inpatient days is associated with lower TPS.
Discussion: Although the main effects of hospitalists staffing level and EMR capability are significant, their interaction is not, suggesting that hospitalists and EMR act through separate mechanisms to help hospitals achieve better performance. When hospitals are not able to invest on both simultaneously, given financial constraints, they can still reap the full benefits from each.
Conclusion: Hospitalists staffing level and EMR capability are both positively correlated with hospitals' TPS, and they act independently to bolster hospital performance.
期刊介绍:
Health Services Management Research (HSMR) is an authoritative international peer-reviewed journal which publishes theoretically and empirically rigorous research on questions of enduring interest to health-care organizations and systems throughout the world. Examining the real issues confronting health services management, it provides an independent view and cutting edge evidence-based research to guide policy-making and management decision-making. HSMR aims to be a forum serving an international community of academics and researchers on the one hand and healthcare managers, executives, policymakers and clinicians and all health professionals on the other. HSMR wants to make a substantial contribution to both research and managerial practice, with particular emphasis placed on publishing studies which offer actionable findings and on promoting knowledge mobilisation toward theoretical advances.