Buddhathida Wangsrimongkol, Roberto L Flores, David A Staffenberg, Eduardo D Rodriguez, Pradip R Shetye
{"title":"唇腭裂伴轻度、中度和重度上颌发育不全患者LeFort I进展后的骨骼和牙齿矫正和稳定性","authors":"Buddhathida Wangsrimongkol, Roberto L Flores, David A Staffenberg, Eduardo D Rodriguez, Pradip R Shetye","doi":"10.1177/1055665621996108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates skeletal and dental outcomes of LeFort I advancement surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) with varying degrees of maxillary skeletal hypoplasia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Lateral cephalograms were digitized at preoperative (T1), immediately postoperative (T2), and 1-year follow-up (T3) and compared to untreated unaffected controls. Based on the severity of cleft maxillary hypoplasia, the sample was divided into 3 groups using Wits analysis: <i>mild</i>: ≤0 to ≥-5 mm; <i>moderate</i>: <-5 to >-10 mm; and <i>severe</i>: ≤-10 mm.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Fifty-one patients with nonsyndromic CLP with hypoplastic maxilla who met inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>LeFort I advancement.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Skeletal and dental stability post-LeFort I surgery at a 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T2, LeFort I surgery produced an average correction of maxillary hypoplasia by 6.4 ± 0.6, 8.1 ± 0.4, and 10.7 ± 0.8 mm in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. There was a mean relapse of 1 to 1.5 mm observed in all groups. At T3, no statistically significant differences were observed between the surgical groups and controls at angle Sella, Nasion, A point (SNA), A point, Nasion, B point (ANB), and overjet outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LeFort I advancement produces a stable correction in mild, moderate, and severe skeletal maxillary hypoplasia. Overcorrection is recommended in all patients with CLP to compensate for the expected postsurgical skeletal relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":520794,"journal":{"name":"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association","volume":" ","pages":"98-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1055665621996108","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skeletal and Dental Correction and Stability Following LeFort I Advancement in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Maxillary Hypoplasia.\",\"authors\":\"Buddhathida Wangsrimongkol, Roberto L Flores, David A Staffenberg, Eduardo D Rodriguez, Pradip R Shetye\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1055665621996108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates skeletal and dental outcomes of LeFort I advancement surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) with varying degrees of maxillary skeletal hypoplasia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Lateral cephalograms were digitized at preoperative (T1), immediately postoperative (T2), and 1-year follow-up (T3) and compared to untreated unaffected controls. Based on the severity of cleft maxillary hypoplasia, the sample was divided into 3 groups using Wits analysis: <i>mild</i>: ≤0 to ≥-5 mm; <i>moderate</i>: <-5 to >-10 mm; and <i>severe</i>: ≤-10 mm.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Fifty-one patients with nonsyndromic CLP with hypoplastic maxilla who met inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>LeFort I advancement.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Skeletal and dental stability post-LeFort I surgery at a 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At T2, LeFort I surgery produced an average correction of maxillary hypoplasia by 6.4 ± 0.6, 8.1 ± 0.4, and 10.7 ± 0.8 mm in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. There was a mean relapse of 1 to 1.5 mm observed in all groups. At T3, no statistically significant differences were observed between the surgical groups and controls at angle Sella, Nasion, A point (SNA), A point, Nasion, B point (ANB), and overjet outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LeFort I advancement produces a stable correction in mild, moderate, and severe skeletal maxillary hypoplasia. Overcorrection is recommended in all patients with CLP to compensate for the expected postsurgical skeletal relapse.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"98-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1055665621996108\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665621996108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/3/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665621996108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Skeletal and Dental Correction and Stability Following LeFort I Advancement in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Maxillary Hypoplasia.
Objective: This study evaluates skeletal and dental outcomes of LeFort I advancement surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) with varying degrees of maxillary skeletal hypoplasia.
Design: Retrospective study.
Method: Lateral cephalograms were digitized at preoperative (T1), immediately postoperative (T2), and 1-year follow-up (T3) and compared to untreated unaffected controls. Based on the severity of cleft maxillary hypoplasia, the sample was divided into 3 groups using Wits analysis: mild: ≤0 to ≥-5 mm; moderate: <-5 to >-10 mm; and severe: ≤-10 mm.
Participants: Fifty-one patients with nonsyndromic CLP with hypoplastic maxilla who met inclusion criteria.
Intervention: LeFort I advancement.
Main outcome measure: Skeletal and dental stability post-LeFort I surgery at a 1-year follow-up.
Results: At T2, LeFort I surgery produced an average correction of maxillary hypoplasia by 6.4 ± 0.6, 8.1 ± 0.4, and 10.7 ± 0.8 mm in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. There was a mean relapse of 1 to 1.5 mm observed in all groups. At T3, no statistically significant differences were observed between the surgical groups and controls at angle Sella, Nasion, A point (SNA), A point, Nasion, B point (ANB), and overjet outcome measures.
Conclusions: LeFort I advancement produces a stable correction in mild, moderate, and severe skeletal maxillary hypoplasia. Overcorrection is recommended in all patients with CLP to compensate for the expected postsurgical skeletal relapse.