周围区域麻醉下高危老年患者股骨近端骨折的手术治疗:一项前瞻性可行性研究。

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Anaesthesist Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-13 DOI:10.1007/s00101-021-00935-6
Ronald Seidel, Eduard Barbakow, Stefan Schulz-Drost
{"title":"周围区域麻醉下高危老年患者股骨近端骨折的手术治疗:一项前瞻性可行性研究。","authors":"Ronald Seidel,&nbsp;Eduard Barbakow,&nbsp;Stefan Schulz-Drost","doi":"10.1007/s00101-021-00935-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Due to changing demographics geriatric patients with multiple comorbidities and proximal femoral fractures are an increasing patient population. In these patient groups, peripheral regional anesthesia could become increasingly more important besides established procedures, such as neuraxial or general anesthesia. The aim of this single center feasibility study was to evaluate a combined blockade technique of the lumbosacral plexus for three predefined subgroups depending on the type of hip fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a unilateral double injection three-step technique to block the sacral (parasacral block) and lumbar plexus (anterior quadratus lumborum and psoas compartment block, n = 78). The blockade was performed both under ultrasound guidance and simultaneous nerve stimulation and 20 ml ropivacaine 0.375% was injected at each of the 3 injection sites (total dose 225 mg).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 42% of cases the surgery was opioid-free (n = 33). In 5 patients a conversion to general anesthesia (insertion of a laryngeal mask and pressure-controlled or pressure-supported ventilation) was necessary (6%). The overall success rate of combination anesthesia (peripheral nerve blocks with supplemental sedative (propofol 1-2 mg/kg*h) or analgesic (incremental doses of 5 µg sufentanil) medication) was 94%, regardless of fracture type and surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined anesthetic technique presented in this study enables surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures. The associated effort and requirement for expert knowledge in regional anesthesia indicates that this method should be considered especially in cases with high anesthetic risk, suitable sonoanatomy, and non-compromised coagulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50796,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesist","volume":"70 12","pages":"1022-1030"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00101-021-00935-6","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures in high-risk geriatric patients under peripheral regional anesthesia : A prospective feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"Ronald Seidel,&nbsp;Eduard Barbakow,&nbsp;Stefan Schulz-Drost\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00101-021-00935-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Due to changing demographics geriatric patients with multiple comorbidities and proximal femoral fractures are an increasing patient population. In these patient groups, peripheral regional anesthesia could become increasingly more important besides established procedures, such as neuraxial or general anesthesia. The aim of this single center feasibility study was to evaluate a combined blockade technique of the lumbosacral plexus for three predefined subgroups depending on the type of hip fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a unilateral double injection three-step technique to block the sacral (parasacral block) and lumbar plexus (anterior quadratus lumborum and psoas compartment block, n = 78). The blockade was performed both under ultrasound guidance and simultaneous nerve stimulation and 20 ml ropivacaine 0.375% was injected at each of the 3 injection sites (total dose 225 mg).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 42% of cases the surgery was opioid-free (n = 33). In 5 patients a conversion to general anesthesia (insertion of a laryngeal mask and pressure-controlled or pressure-supported ventilation) was necessary (6%). The overall success rate of combination anesthesia (peripheral nerve blocks with supplemental sedative (propofol 1-2 mg/kg*h) or analgesic (incremental doses of 5 µg sufentanil) medication) was 94%, regardless of fracture type and surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined anesthetic technique presented in this study enables surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures. The associated effort and requirement for expert knowledge in regional anesthesia indicates that this method should be considered especially in cases with high anesthetic risk, suitable sonoanatomy, and non-compromised coagulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesist\",\"volume\":\"70 12\",\"pages\":\"1022-1030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00101-021-00935-6\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-021-00935-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-021-00935-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景与目的:由于人口统计学的变化,患有多种合并症和股骨近端骨折的老年患者越来越多。在这些患者群体中,除了已建立的程序,如神经轴或全身麻醉,外周区域麻醉可能变得越来越重要。这项单中心可行性研究的目的是根据髋部骨折的类型,评估腰骶神经丛联合阻断技术对三个预定义亚组的疗效。方法:采用单侧双注射三步技术阻断骶骨(骶旁阻滞)和腰丛(腰前方肌和腰肌隔室阻滞,n = 78)。在超声引导和同时神经刺激下进行阻断,3个注射部位各注射0.375%罗哌卡因20 ml(总剂量225 mg)。结果:42%的病例手术不含阿片类药物( = 33)。5例患者需要转至全麻(插入喉罩和压力控制或压力支持通气)(6%)。无论骨折类型和手术方式如何,联合麻醉(外周神经阻滞加镇静(异丙酚1-2 mg/kg*h)或镇痛(舒芬太尼5 µg增加剂量)的总成功率为94%。结论:本研究提出的联合麻醉技术使股骨近端骨折的手术治疗成为可能。相关的努力和对区域麻醉专业知识的要求表明,这种方法应该被考虑,特别是在麻醉风险高、超声检查合适、凝血不受损的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures in high-risk geriatric patients under peripheral regional anesthesia : A prospective feasibility study.

Background and objective: Due to changing demographics geriatric patients with multiple comorbidities and proximal femoral fractures are an increasing patient population. In these patient groups, peripheral regional anesthesia could become increasingly more important besides established procedures, such as neuraxial or general anesthesia. The aim of this single center feasibility study was to evaluate a combined blockade technique of the lumbosacral plexus for three predefined subgroups depending on the type of hip fracture.

Methods: We used a unilateral double injection three-step technique to block the sacral (parasacral block) and lumbar plexus (anterior quadratus lumborum and psoas compartment block, n = 78). The blockade was performed both under ultrasound guidance and simultaneous nerve stimulation and 20 ml ropivacaine 0.375% was injected at each of the 3 injection sites (total dose 225 mg).

Results: In 42% of cases the surgery was opioid-free (n = 33). In 5 patients a conversion to general anesthesia (insertion of a laryngeal mask and pressure-controlled or pressure-supported ventilation) was necessary (6%). The overall success rate of combination anesthesia (peripheral nerve blocks with supplemental sedative (propofol 1-2 mg/kg*h) or analgesic (incremental doses of 5 µg sufentanil) medication) was 94%, regardless of fracture type and surgical treatment.

Conclusion: The combined anesthetic technique presented in this study enables surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures. The associated effort and requirement for expert knowledge in regional anesthesia indicates that this method should be considered especially in cases with high anesthetic risk, suitable sonoanatomy, and non-compromised coagulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesist
Anaesthesist 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Anaesthesist is an internationally recognized journal de­aling with all aspects of anaesthesia and intensive medicine up to pain therapy. Der Anaesthesist addresses all specialists and scientists particularly interested in anaesthesiology and it is neighbouring areas. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics reflecting the multidisciplinary environment including pharmacotherapy, intensive medicine, emergency medicine, regional anaesthetics, pain therapy and medical law. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of relevant clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信