自我报告的不孕症诊断和治疗史大约20年后的生育治疗开始。

Alesia M Jung, Stacey A Missmer, Daniel W Cramer, Elizabeth S Ginsburg, Kathryn L Terry, Allison F Vitonis, Leslie V Farland
{"title":"自我报告的不孕症诊断和治疗史大约20年后的生育治疗开始。","authors":"Alesia M Jung,&nbsp;Stacey A Missmer,&nbsp;Daniel W Cramer,&nbsp;Elizabeth S Ginsburg,&nbsp;Kathryn L Terry,&nbsp;Allison F Vitonis,&nbsp;Leslie V Farland","doi":"10.1186/s40738-021-00099-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infertility history may have important implications for clinical practice and scientific discovery. Previous research on the validity of self-reported infertility measurements has been limited in scope and duration (< 5 years). In this study, we validated self-reported infertility history measures 15-23 years after fertility treatment initiation among women who utilized assisted reproductive technology (ART).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women who received ART treatments from three Boston infertility clinics and who enrolled in a prior study (1994-2003) were re-contacted in 2018 for the AfteR Treatment Follow-up Study (ART-FS). Infertility history was collected from clinical records and two self-report questionnaires (at ART initiation and at ART-FS enrollment). Treatment history included specific details (fresh or frozen embryo transfers, number of cycles) and treatment recall prior to ART initiation. Self-reported infertility diagnoses included polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), endometriosis, uterine factor infertility, tubal factor infertility, diminished ovarian reserve/advanced maternal age, male factor infertility, and other/unknown. We compared self-reported measures from 2018 to self-reported and clinical data from prior study initiation, using Cohen's kappa, sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2644 women we attempted to recontact, 808 completed the ART-FS, with an average follow-up of 19.6 years (standard deviation: 2.7). Recall of fertility treatment usage had moderate sensitivity (IVF = 0.85, Clomiphene/Gonadotropin = 0.81) but low specificity across different infertility treatment modalities (IVF = 0.63, Clomiphene/Gonadotropin = 0.55). Specific IVF details had low to moderate validity and reliability with clinical records. Reliability of recalled infertility diagnosis was higher when compared to self-report at ART initiation (PCOS K = 0.66, Endometriosis K = 0.76, Tubal K = 0.73) than when compared to clinical records (PCOS K = 0.31, Endometriosis K = 0.48, Tubal K = 0.62) and varied by diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ability of women to recall specific IVF treatment details was moderately accurate and recall of self-reported infertility diagnosis varied by diagnosis and measurement method.</p>","PeriodicalId":87254,"journal":{"name":"Fertility research and practice","volume":"7 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40738-021-00099-2","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-reported infertility diagnoses and treatment history approximately 20 years after fertility treatment initiation.\",\"authors\":\"Alesia M Jung,&nbsp;Stacey A Missmer,&nbsp;Daniel W Cramer,&nbsp;Elizabeth S Ginsburg,&nbsp;Kathryn L Terry,&nbsp;Allison F Vitonis,&nbsp;Leslie V Farland\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40738-021-00099-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infertility history may have important implications for clinical practice and scientific discovery. Previous research on the validity of self-reported infertility measurements has been limited in scope and duration (< 5 years). In this study, we validated self-reported infertility history measures 15-23 years after fertility treatment initiation among women who utilized assisted reproductive technology (ART).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women who received ART treatments from three Boston infertility clinics and who enrolled in a prior study (1994-2003) were re-contacted in 2018 for the AfteR Treatment Follow-up Study (ART-FS). Infertility history was collected from clinical records and two self-report questionnaires (at ART initiation and at ART-FS enrollment). Treatment history included specific details (fresh or frozen embryo transfers, number of cycles) and treatment recall prior to ART initiation. Self-reported infertility diagnoses included polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), endometriosis, uterine factor infertility, tubal factor infertility, diminished ovarian reserve/advanced maternal age, male factor infertility, and other/unknown. We compared self-reported measures from 2018 to self-reported and clinical data from prior study initiation, using Cohen's kappa, sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2644 women we attempted to recontact, 808 completed the ART-FS, with an average follow-up of 19.6 years (standard deviation: 2.7). Recall of fertility treatment usage had moderate sensitivity (IVF = 0.85, Clomiphene/Gonadotropin = 0.81) but low specificity across different infertility treatment modalities (IVF = 0.63, Clomiphene/Gonadotropin = 0.55). Specific IVF details had low to moderate validity and reliability with clinical records. Reliability of recalled infertility diagnosis was higher when compared to self-report at ART initiation (PCOS K = 0.66, Endometriosis K = 0.76, Tubal K = 0.73) than when compared to clinical records (PCOS K = 0.31, Endometriosis K = 0.48, Tubal K = 0.62) and varied by diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ability of women to recall specific IVF treatment details was moderately accurate and recall of self-reported infertility diagnosis varied by diagnosis and measurement method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fertility research and practice\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40738-021-00099-2\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fertility research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-021-00099-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-021-00099-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:不孕史对临床实践和科学发现具有重要意义。先前关于自我报告的不孕症测量的有效性的研究在范围和持续时间上受到限制(方法:在2018年重新联系了从三家波士顿不孕症诊所接受抗逆转录病毒治疗并参加先前研究(1994-2003)的妇女,进行治疗后随访研究(ART- fs)。从临床记录和两份自我报告问卷(ART开始时和ART- fs入组时)收集不孕病史。治疗史包括具体细节(新鲜或冷冻胚胎移植,周期数)和开始抗逆转录病毒治疗前的治疗回忆。自我报告的不孕症诊断包括多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)、子宫内膜异位症、子宫因素不孕症、输卵管因素不孕症、卵巢储备功能减退/高龄产妇、男性因素不孕症和其他/未知因素。我们使用Cohen’s kappa、敏感性、特异性和95%置信区间,将2018年的自我报告测量值与先前研究开始时的自我报告和临床数据进行了比较。结果:在2644名女性中,808名完成了ART-FS,平均随访19.6年(标准差:2.7)。生育治疗使用的回忆具有中等敏感性(体外受精= 0.85,克罗米芬/促性腺激素= 0.81),但不同治疗方式的特异性较低(体外受精= 0.63,克罗米芬/促性腺激素= 0.55)。具体的试管婴儿细节与临床记录具有低到中等的效度和信度。与ART开始时的自我报告相比(PCOS K = 0.66,子宫内膜异位症K = 0.76,输卵管K = 0.73),回忆性不孕症诊断的可靠性高于与临床记录(PCOS K = 0.31,子宫内膜异位症K = 0.48,输卵管K = 0.62)相比,且因诊断而异。结论:女性回忆特定IVF治疗细节的能力是中等准确的,自我报告的不孕症诊断的回忆能力因诊断和测量方法而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Self-reported infertility diagnoses and treatment history approximately 20 years after fertility treatment initiation.

Self-reported infertility diagnoses and treatment history approximately 20 years after fertility treatment initiation.

Self-reported infertility diagnoses and treatment history approximately 20 years after fertility treatment initiation.

Background: Infertility history may have important implications for clinical practice and scientific discovery. Previous research on the validity of self-reported infertility measurements has been limited in scope and duration (< 5 years). In this study, we validated self-reported infertility history measures 15-23 years after fertility treatment initiation among women who utilized assisted reproductive technology (ART).

Methods: Women who received ART treatments from three Boston infertility clinics and who enrolled in a prior study (1994-2003) were re-contacted in 2018 for the AfteR Treatment Follow-up Study (ART-FS). Infertility history was collected from clinical records and two self-report questionnaires (at ART initiation and at ART-FS enrollment). Treatment history included specific details (fresh or frozen embryo transfers, number of cycles) and treatment recall prior to ART initiation. Self-reported infertility diagnoses included polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), endometriosis, uterine factor infertility, tubal factor infertility, diminished ovarian reserve/advanced maternal age, male factor infertility, and other/unknown. We compared self-reported measures from 2018 to self-reported and clinical data from prior study initiation, using Cohen's kappa, sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Of 2644 women we attempted to recontact, 808 completed the ART-FS, with an average follow-up of 19.6 years (standard deviation: 2.7). Recall of fertility treatment usage had moderate sensitivity (IVF = 0.85, Clomiphene/Gonadotropin = 0.81) but low specificity across different infertility treatment modalities (IVF = 0.63, Clomiphene/Gonadotropin = 0.55). Specific IVF details had low to moderate validity and reliability with clinical records. Reliability of recalled infertility diagnosis was higher when compared to self-report at ART initiation (PCOS K = 0.66, Endometriosis K = 0.76, Tubal K = 0.73) than when compared to clinical records (PCOS K = 0.31, Endometriosis K = 0.48, Tubal K = 0.62) and varied by diagnosis.

Conclusions: The ability of women to recall specific IVF treatment details was moderately accurate and recall of self-reported infertility diagnosis varied by diagnosis and measurement method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信