[与传统的骑自行车者相比,Pedelec使用者受伤更严重]。

4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Unfallchirurg Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-04 DOI:10.1007/s00113-021-00976-x
T L Lefarth, H P A M Poos, C Juhra, K W Wendt, O Pieske
{"title":"[与传统的骑自行车者相比,Pedelec使用者受伤更严重]。","authors":"T L Lefarth,&nbsp;H P A M Poos,&nbsp;C Juhra,&nbsp;K W Wendt,&nbsp;O Pieske","doi":"10.1007/s00113-021-00976-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For years e‑bike (Pedelec) sales have been steadily increasing. Therefore, the incidence of e‑bike-related injuries and deaths has been growing. Due to clinical experience, emergency personnel are suspecting that e‑bikers might be injured more severely compared to conventional bicyclists suffering from an accident. This topic has not yet been analyzed for Germany.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Analysis of injury severity and mortality following e‑bike and conventional bicycle accidents in a level I trauma center in Germany.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data of patients treated after a bicycle accident at the accident and emergency department as well as the clinic for traumatology and orthopedics of the Evangelical Hospital (Evangelisches Krankenhaus) Oldenburg were gathered from 1 March 2017 to 1 March 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study 59 electric bicycle users (e-bikers) and 164 conventional cyclists were included. The average age of e‑bikers was 62 years compared to 48 years in the group of conventional cyclists. Comorbidities were significantly more frequent in the e‑bike group compared to classical cyclists. The e‑bikers were found to be significantly more severely injured than conventional bicyclists, the mean injury severity scores (ISS) were 5.2 and 3.4, respectively. E‑bikers were admitted to the hospital more often and for longer periods than the control group. There was no significant difference in mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>E‑bikers are more severely injured in accidents compared to conventional cyclists. Due to older age and comorbidity they form a sensitive trauma subgroup. Based on demographics, an increase of old age, more frail cyclists and a growing incidence of serious e‑bike accidents is to be expected. Preventive measures, such as helmet usage and riding lessons should be introduced, especially in e‑bikers. E‑bikers in the emergency department should be examined and treated with special care and aggressive diagnostics. A low threshold for an initial interdisciplinary assessment (shock room management) is advised.</p>","PeriodicalId":49397,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurg","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00113-021-00976-x","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Pedelec users get more severely injured compared to conventional cyclists].\",\"authors\":\"T L Lefarth,&nbsp;H P A M Poos,&nbsp;C Juhra,&nbsp;K W Wendt,&nbsp;O Pieske\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00113-021-00976-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For years e‑bike (Pedelec) sales have been steadily increasing. Therefore, the incidence of e‑bike-related injuries and deaths has been growing. Due to clinical experience, emergency personnel are suspecting that e‑bikers might be injured more severely compared to conventional bicyclists suffering from an accident. This topic has not yet been analyzed for Germany.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Analysis of injury severity and mortality following e‑bike and conventional bicycle accidents in a level I trauma center in Germany.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data of patients treated after a bicycle accident at the accident and emergency department as well as the clinic for traumatology and orthopedics of the Evangelical Hospital (Evangelisches Krankenhaus) Oldenburg were gathered from 1 March 2017 to 1 March 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study 59 electric bicycle users (e-bikers) and 164 conventional cyclists were included. The average age of e‑bikers was 62 years compared to 48 years in the group of conventional cyclists. Comorbidities were significantly more frequent in the e‑bike group compared to classical cyclists. The e‑bikers were found to be significantly more severely injured than conventional bicyclists, the mean injury severity scores (ISS) were 5.2 and 3.4, respectively. E‑bikers were admitted to the hospital more often and for longer periods than the control group. There was no significant difference in mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>E‑bikers are more severely injured in accidents compared to conventional cyclists. Due to older age and comorbidity they form a sensitive trauma subgroup. Based on demographics, an increase of old age, more frail cyclists and a growing incidence of serious e‑bike accidents is to be expected. Preventive measures, such as helmet usage and riding lessons should be introduced, especially in e‑bikers. E‑bikers in the emergency department should be examined and treated with special care and aggressive diagnostics. A low threshold for an initial interdisciplinary assessment (shock room management) is advised.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Unfallchirurg\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00113-021-00976-x\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Unfallchirurg\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-021-00976-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfallchirurg","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-021-00976-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:多年来,电动自行车(Pedelec)的销量一直在稳步增长。因此,与电动自行车相关的伤害和死亡的发生率一直在上升。根据临床经验,急救人员怀疑电动自行车骑行者在事故中受伤的程度可能比传统自行车骑行者更严重。这个话题还没有针对德国进行分析。目的:分析德国某一级创伤中心电动自行车和传统自行车事故后的损伤严重程度和死亡率。材料和方法:收集了2017年3月1日至2019年3月1日在奥尔登堡福音医院(Evangelisches Krankenhaus)事故和急诊科以及创伤和骨科诊所接受自行车事故治疗的患者的数据。结果:本研究共纳入59名电动自行车使用者(e-bikers)和164名传统骑自行车者。电动自行车骑行者的平均年龄为62岁,而传统自行车骑行者的平均年龄为48岁。与传统骑自行车的人相比,电动自行车组的合并症明显更频繁。研究发现,电动自行车骑行者的受伤程度明显高于传统自行车骑行者,平均受伤严重程度评分(ISS)分别为5.2和3.4。与对照组相比,骑电动自行车的人入院的次数更多,时间更长。死亡率无显著差异。结论:与传统骑自行车的人相比,电动自行车手在事故中受伤更严重。由于年龄较大和合并症,他们形成了一个敏感的创伤亚组。根据人口统计数据,预计老年人、体弱多病的骑自行车者和严重电动自行车事故的发生率将会增加。应采取预防措施,例如使用头盔和上骑行课,尤其是在电动自行车骑行者中。急诊部的电动自行车患者应该接受特别的检查和治疗,并进行积极的诊断。建议初步跨学科评估(休克室管理)的门槛较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Pedelec users get more severely injured compared to conventional cyclists].

Background: For years e‑bike (Pedelec) sales have been steadily increasing. Therefore, the incidence of e‑bike-related injuries and deaths has been growing. Due to clinical experience, emergency personnel are suspecting that e‑bikers might be injured more severely compared to conventional bicyclists suffering from an accident. This topic has not yet been analyzed for Germany.

Objective: Analysis of injury severity and mortality following e‑bike and conventional bicycle accidents in a level I trauma center in Germany.

Material and methods: Data of patients treated after a bicycle accident at the accident and emergency department as well as the clinic for traumatology and orthopedics of the Evangelical Hospital (Evangelisches Krankenhaus) Oldenburg were gathered from 1 March 2017 to 1 March 2019.

Results: In this study 59 electric bicycle users (e-bikers) and 164 conventional cyclists were included. The average age of e‑bikers was 62 years compared to 48 years in the group of conventional cyclists. Comorbidities were significantly more frequent in the e‑bike group compared to classical cyclists. The e‑bikers were found to be significantly more severely injured than conventional bicyclists, the mean injury severity scores (ISS) were 5.2 and 3.4, respectively. E‑bikers were admitted to the hospital more often and for longer periods than the control group. There was no significant difference in mortality.

Conclusion: E‑bikers are more severely injured in accidents compared to conventional cyclists. Due to older age and comorbidity they form a sensitive trauma subgroup. Based on demographics, an increase of old age, more frail cyclists and a growing incidence of serious e‑bike accidents is to be expected. Preventive measures, such as helmet usage and riding lessons should be introduced, especially in e‑bikers. E‑bikers in the emergency department should be examined and treated with special care and aggressive diagnostics. A low threshold for an initial interdisciplinary assessment (shock room management) is advised.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Unfallchirurg
Unfallchirurg 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Unfallchirurg is an internationally recognised publication organ. The journal deals with all aspects of accident surgery and reconstruction surgery and serves the continuing medical education of surgeons and accident surgeons with own practices and those working in hospitals. Practically-oriented works provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of accident surgery. Besides the imparting of relevant background knowledge, the focus is on the assessment of scientific findings under consideration of practical experience. The reader is given concrete recommendations for his/her practical work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信