围生期急诊子宫切除术患者手术方式对手术结果的影响:一项回顾性多中心研究。

Mehmet Bulbul, Talip Karacor, Nurullah Peker, Mehmet Can Nacar, Gulcan Okutucu
{"title":"围生期急诊子宫切除术患者手术方式对手术结果的影响:一项回顾性多中心研究。","authors":"Mehmet Bulbul,&nbsp;Talip Karacor,&nbsp;Nurullah Peker,&nbsp;Mehmet Can Nacar,&nbsp;Gulcan Okutucu","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2021.1892634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of surgical procedure on the operation's results in patients undergoing emergency peripartum hysterectomy (EPH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The records of patients who underwent EPH due to postpartum hemorrhage between 2010 and 2020 in two tertiary centers with a high crude delivery rate were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical data were compared according to the EPH type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 115,709 births occurred in these two centers. EPH was administered for 181 (1.6%) of these patients. Sixty-seven (37%) of the EPH cases involved subtotal EPH (SEPH), and 114 (63%) were total EPH (TEPH). Surgical time (107.3 ± 17.6 vs. 134.2 ± 32.3 min, <i>p</i> < 0.001), erythrocyte transfusion count (2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 4.3 ± 6.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001), ureter injury (0.0 vs. 7.9%), bladder injury (1.5 vs. 28.1%), disseminated intravascular coagulation (1.5 vs. 9.6%), need for relaparotomy (4.5 vs. 14%), and intensive care unit admission (19.4 vs. 52.6%) were found to be higher in the TEPH group compared to the SEPH group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In addition, the total length of hospitalization was longer in the TEPH group (4.5 ± 2.3 vs. 6.1 ± 4.6 day, <i>p</i> = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results, if the bleeding in peripartum hemorrhage requiring EPH can be controlled with SEPH, attempting to remove the cervix completely may be associated with increased surgical time, blood transfusion need, and surgical complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":520807,"journal":{"name":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","volume":" ","pages":"5768-5774"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14767058.2021.1892634","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of surgical procedure on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a retrospective multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Bulbul,&nbsp;Talip Karacor,&nbsp;Nurullah Peker,&nbsp;Mehmet Can Nacar,&nbsp;Gulcan Okutucu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14767058.2021.1892634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of surgical procedure on the operation's results in patients undergoing emergency peripartum hysterectomy (EPH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The records of patients who underwent EPH due to postpartum hemorrhage between 2010 and 2020 in two tertiary centers with a high crude delivery rate were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical data were compared according to the EPH type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 115,709 births occurred in these two centers. EPH was administered for 181 (1.6%) of these patients. Sixty-seven (37%) of the EPH cases involved subtotal EPH (SEPH), and 114 (63%) were total EPH (TEPH). Surgical time (107.3 ± 17.6 vs. 134.2 ± 32.3 min, <i>p</i> < 0.001), erythrocyte transfusion count (2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 4.3 ± 6.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001), ureter injury (0.0 vs. 7.9%), bladder injury (1.5 vs. 28.1%), disseminated intravascular coagulation (1.5 vs. 9.6%), need for relaparotomy (4.5 vs. 14%), and intensive care unit admission (19.4 vs. 52.6%) were found to be higher in the TEPH group compared to the SEPH group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In addition, the total length of hospitalization was longer in the TEPH group (4.5 ± 2.3 vs. 6.1 ± 4.6 day, <i>p</i> = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results, if the bleeding in peripartum hemorrhage requiring EPH can be controlled with SEPH, attempting to remove the cervix completely may be associated with increased surgical time, blood transfusion need, and surgical complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5768-5774\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14767058.2021.1892634\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1892634\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1892634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:探讨围生期急诊子宫切除术(EPH)患者手术方式对手术效果的影响。方法:回顾性分析2010 ~ 2020年两家粗分娩率较高的三级中心因产后出血行EPH的患者资料。根据EPH类型比较手术资料。结果:在研究期间,这两个中心共发生115,709例分娩。其中181例(1.6%)患者接受EPH治疗。67例(37%)EPH为次总EPH, 114例(63%)EPH为总EPH。手术时间(107.3±17.6和134.2±32.3分钟,p p p p = 0.011)。结论:根据研究结果,如果需要EPH的围生期大出血可以通过SEPH控制出血,完全切除子宫颈可能会增加手术时间、输血需求和手术并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of surgical procedure on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a retrospective multicenter study.

Objective: To investigate the effect of surgical procedure on the operation's results in patients undergoing emergency peripartum hysterectomy (EPH).

Methods: The records of patients who underwent EPH due to postpartum hemorrhage between 2010 and 2020 in two tertiary centers with a high crude delivery rate were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical data were compared according to the EPH type.

Results: During the study period, 115,709 births occurred in these two centers. EPH was administered for 181 (1.6%) of these patients. Sixty-seven (37%) of the EPH cases involved subtotal EPH (SEPH), and 114 (63%) were total EPH (TEPH). Surgical time (107.3 ± 17.6 vs. 134.2 ± 32.3 min, p < 0.001), erythrocyte transfusion count (2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 4.3 ± 6.2, p < 0.001), ureter injury (0.0 vs. 7.9%), bladder injury (1.5 vs. 28.1%), disseminated intravascular coagulation (1.5 vs. 9.6%), need for relaparotomy (4.5 vs. 14%), and intensive care unit admission (19.4 vs. 52.6%) were found to be higher in the TEPH group compared to the SEPH group (p < 0.05). In addition, the total length of hospitalization was longer in the TEPH group (4.5 ± 2.3 vs. 6.1 ± 4.6 day, p = 0.011).

Conclusion: According to the results, if the bleeding in peripartum hemorrhage requiring EPH can be controlled with SEPH, attempting to remove the cervix completely may be associated with increased surgical time, blood transfusion need, and surgical complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信