识字与指数保险决策的质量。

The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-02-23 DOI:10.1057/s10713-020-00060-1
Glenn Harrison, Karlijn Morsink, Mark Schneider
{"title":"识字与指数保险决策的质量。","authors":"Glenn Harrison,&nbsp;Karlijn Morsink,&nbsp;Mark Schneider","doi":"10.1057/s10713-020-00060-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is widespread concern in developing countries with the expansion of formal insurance products to help manage significant risks. These concerns arise primarily from a lack of understanding of insurance products, general failures of financial literacy and the need to use relatively exotic products in order to keep costs down for poor households. We investigate the importance of incentivized measures for general understanding, as well as domain-specific knowledge of the decision context on the purchase and the quality of index insurance decisions. We evaluate the quality of financial decisions by comparing the individual expected welfare outcomes of a number of decisions each individual makes to purchase index insurance or not. We find that excess purchase is an important driver of welfare losses, and that our incentivized measure of domain-specific literacy plays a critical role in bringing about better quality index insurance decisions.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1057/s10713-020-00060-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":507077,"journal":{"name":"The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"66-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7901166/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literacy and the quality of index insurance decisions.\",\"authors\":\"Glenn Harrison,&nbsp;Karlijn Morsink,&nbsp;Mark Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s10713-020-00060-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is widespread concern in developing countries with the expansion of formal insurance products to help manage significant risks. These concerns arise primarily from a lack of understanding of insurance products, general failures of financial literacy and the need to use relatively exotic products in order to keep costs down for poor households. We investigate the importance of incentivized measures for general understanding, as well as domain-specific knowledge of the decision context on the purchase and the quality of index insurance decisions. We evaluate the quality of financial decisions by comparing the individual expected welfare outcomes of a number of decisions each individual makes to purchase index insurance or not. We find that excess purchase is an important driver of welfare losses, and that our incentivized measure of domain-specific literacy plays a critical role in bringing about better quality index insurance decisions.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1057/s10713-020-00060-1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":507077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"66-97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7901166/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s10713-020-00060-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/2/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s10713-020-00060-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

发展中国家普遍关注正规保险产品的扩大,以帮助管理重大风险。这些担忧主要是由于缺乏对保险产品的了解,普遍缺乏金融知识,需要使用相对新奇的产品,以降低贫困家庭的成本。我们研究了激励措施对一般理解的重要性,以及对购买和指数保险决策质量的决策上下文的领域特定知识。我们通过比较每个人购买指数保险或不购买指数保险的一系列决策的个人预期福利结果来评估财务决策的质量。我们发现,过度购买是福利损失的一个重要驱动因素,我们对特定领域识字率的激励措施在带来更好质量的指数保险决策方面起着关键作用。补充信息:在线版本提供的补充信息为:10.1057/s10713-020-00060-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Literacy and the quality of index insurance decisions.

Literacy and the quality of index insurance decisions.

Literacy and the quality of index insurance decisions.

Literacy and the quality of index insurance decisions.

There is widespread concern in developing countries with the expansion of formal insurance products to help manage significant risks. These concerns arise primarily from a lack of understanding of insurance products, general failures of financial literacy and the need to use relatively exotic products in order to keep costs down for poor households. We investigate the importance of incentivized measures for general understanding, as well as domain-specific knowledge of the decision context on the purchase and the quality of index insurance decisions. We evaluate the quality of financial decisions by comparing the individual expected welfare outcomes of a number of decisions each individual makes to purchase index insurance or not. We find that excess purchase is an important driver of welfare losses, and that our incentivized measure of domain-specific literacy plays a critical role in bringing about better quality index insurance decisions.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1057/s10713-020-00060-1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信