介孔二氧化硅纳米颗粒对荷瘤小鼠化疗效果的meta分析。

Q3 Engineering
Anthony McGoron
{"title":"介孔二氧化硅纳米颗粒对荷瘤小鼠化疗效果的meta分析。","authors":"Anthony McGoron","doi":"10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2020035804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nanomedicines have played an important role in the management of cancer patients with PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (e.g., Doxil) and nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane) being two examples that have been commercially successful. However, the number of patients benefitting from these therapies is small compared with the potential impact. While off-site toxicities have been reduced, long term survival has not been realized. Thus, there continues to be a need for improved therapies and nanomedicine (delivery of drugs using nanoparticle carriers) that provide advantages over the delivery of free drug. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) are a unique class of nanomedicine that offers high loading capacity, the ability of targeting specificity, potential for stimulated drug release and are considered generally safe and non-toxic. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of 166 published studies in which MSNs were evaluated in vivo and tumor response was reported. Eleven studies with liposomal doxorubicin and 3 studies with Abraxane are also included in the analysis. The MSN formulations exhibit a wide range of size, charge, drug loading and drug release. The tumor inhibition ratio (TIR) of some MSN formulations compared favorably to the FDA approved nanomedicines. However, TIR reached at least 99% in only 14 MSN formulations reported. On average, targeted MSNs and MSNs with combined therapy (multiple drugs, or drugs combined with thermal therapy) performed best. Survival was reported in 14 MSN studies. The reported increased life survival (ILS) tended to be longer for liposomal doxorubicin and Abraxane than for the MSN formulations. The paper also provides an overview of MSN synthesis strategies and compares the development timeline of MSNs to that of Doxil and Abraxane, discussing the barriers to commercialization. Finally, the paper provides recommendations to advance the development and commercialization of MSNs for cancer therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":53679,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"48 6","pages":"327-418"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-Analysis of Efficacy of Chemotherapy Delivered by Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles to Tumor-Bearing Mice.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony McGoron\",\"doi\":\"10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2020035804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nanomedicines have played an important role in the management of cancer patients with PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (e.g., Doxil) and nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane) being two examples that have been commercially successful. However, the number of patients benefitting from these therapies is small compared with the potential impact. While off-site toxicities have been reduced, long term survival has not been realized. Thus, there continues to be a need for improved therapies and nanomedicine (delivery of drugs using nanoparticle carriers) that provide advantages over the delivery of free drug. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) are a unique class of nanomedicine that offers high loading capacity, the ability of targeting specificity, potential for stimulated drug release and are considered generally safe and non-toxic. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of 166 published studies in which MSNs were evaluated in vivo and tumor response was reported. Eleven studies with liposomal doxorubicin and 3 studies with Abraxane are also included in the analysis. The MSN formulations exhibit a wide range of size, charge, drug loading and drug release. The tumor inhibition ratio (TIR) of some MSN formulations compared favorably to the FDA approved nanomedicines. However, TIR reached at least 99% in only 14 MSN formulations reported. On average, targeted MSNs and MSNs with combined therapy (multiple drugs, or drugs combined with thermal therapy) performed best. Survival was reported in 14 MSN studies. The reported increased life survival (ILS) tended to be longer for liposomal doxorubicin and Abraxane than for the MSN formulations. The paper also provides an overview of MSN synthesis strategies and compares the development timeline of MSNs to that of Doxil and Abraxane, discussing the barriers to commercialization. Finally, the paper provides recommendations to advance the development and commercialization of MSNs for cancer therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"48 6\",\"pages\":\"327-418\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2020035804\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2020035804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纳米药物在使用聚乙二醇化脂质体阿霉素(如Doxil)和nab-紫杉醇(Abraxane)治疗癌症患者方面发挥了重要作用,这是两个在商业上取得成功的例子。然而,与潜在影响相比,受益于这些疗法的患者数量很少。虽然场外毒性已经降低,但长期生存尚未实现。因此,仍然需要改进治疗方法和纳米医学(使用纳米颗粒载体递送药物),它们比自由递送药物具有优势。介孔二氧化硅纳米颗粒(MSNs)是一类独特的纳米药物,具有高负载能力,靶向特异性能力,刺激药物释放的潜力,通常被认为是安全无毒的。本文对166项已发表的研究进行了综合分析,其中对MSNs进行了体内评价,并报道了肿瘤反应。11项使用阿霉素脂质体的研究和3项使用Abraxane的研究也被纳入分析。该微球制剂具有广泛的粒径、电荷、载药量和药物释放特性。一些MSN制剂的肿瘤抑制率(TIR)优于FDA批准的纳米药物。然而,只有14个MSN配方的TIR达到99%以上。平均而言,靶向msn和联合治疗(多种药物或药物联合热疗法)的msn效果最好。14项MSN研究报告了生存率。据报道,阿霉素和Abraxane脂质体比MSN制剂增加的生存期(ILS)更长。本文还概述了MSN的合成策略,并将MSN的开发时间表与Doxil和Abraxane进行了比较,讨论了商业化的障碍。最后,本文提出了促进微微颗粒在癌症治疗中的开发和商业化的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meta-Analysis of Efficacy of Chemotherapy Delivered by Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles to Tumor-Bearing Mice.

Nanomedicines have played an important role in the management of cancer patients with PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (e.g., Doxil) and nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane) being two examples that have been commercially successful. However, the number of patients benefitting from these therapies is small compared with the potential impact. While off-site toxicities have been reduced, long term survival has not been realized. Thus, there continues to be a need for improved therapies and nanomedicine (delivery of drugs using nanoparticle carriers) that provide advantages over the delivery of free drug. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) are a unique class of nanomedicine that offers high loading capacity, the ability of targeting specificity, potential for stimulated drug release and are considered generally safe and non-toxic. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of 166 published studies in which MSNs were evaluated in vivo and tumor response was reported. Eleven studies with liposomal doxorubicin and 3 studies with Abraxane are also included in the analysis. The MSN formulations exhibit a wide range of size, charge, drug loading and drug release. The tumor inhibition ratio (TIR) of some MSN formulations compared favorably to the FDA approved nanomedicines. However, TIR reached at least 99% in only 14 MSN formulations reported. On average, targeted MSNs and MSNs with combined therapy (multiple drugs, or drugs combined with thermal therapy) performed best. Survival was reported in 14 MSN studies. The reported increased life survival (ILS) tended to be longer for liposomal doxorubicin and Abraxane than for the MSN formulations. The paper also provides an overview of MSN synthesis strategies and compares the development timeline of MSNs to that of Doxil and Abraxane, discussing the barriers to commercialization. Finally, the paper provides recommendations to advance the development and commercialization of MSNs for cancer therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Biomedical engineering has been characterized as the application of concepts drawn from engineering, computing, communications, mathematics, and the physical sciences to scientific and applied problems in the field of medicine and biology. Concepts and methodologies in biomedical engineering extend throughout the medical and biological sciences. This journal attempts to critically review a wide range of research and applied activities in the field. More often than not, topics chosen for inclusion are concerned with research and practice issues of current interest. Experts writing each review bring together current knowledge and historical information that has led to the current state-of-the-art.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信