硬膜外血液贴片治疗硬膜穿刺后头痛的远期疗效:一项初步研究。

Q3 Medicine
Psychopharmacology bulletin Pub Date : 2020-10-15
Jamal Hasoon, Ivan Urits, Rana Al-Jumah, Mark Burroughs, Viet Cai, Omar Viswanath, Musa Aner, Paragi H Rana, Thomas Simopoulos, Alan D Kaye, Jatinder Gill
{"title":"硬膜外血液贴片治疗硬膜穿刺后头痛的远期疗效:一项初步研究。","authors":"Jamal Hasoon,&nbsp;Ivan Urits,&nbsp;Rana Al-Jumah,&nbsp;Mark Burroughs,&nbsp;Viet Cai,&nbsp;Omar Viswanath,&nbsp;Musa Aner,&nbsp;Paragi H Rana,&nbsp;Thomas Simopoulos,&nbsp;Alan D Kaye,&nbsp;Jatinder Gill","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a known complication which may occur in the setting of patients undergoing lumbar punctures (LP) for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. The gold standard for treating a PDPH is an epidural blood patch (EBP). There have been few publications evaluating the long-term outcomes of PDPH treated with EBP. The aim of this pilot study was to examine the incidence of chronic headaches in dural puncture patients who received EBP versus those who did not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case control study was performed at a single large center institution. Forty-nine patients who had intentional dural puncture were identified on chart review and completed a survey questionnaire via phone interview: twenty-six of these patients required a subsequent EBP, while twenty-three did not. The primary outcomes were the development and prevalence of chronic headaches after the procedures. There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of current headaches between the EBP group and Non-EBP group (54% vs. 52% p = 0.91). There were no significant differences in the rates of severity and descriptive qualities of headache between the EBP and non-EBP groups. There was higher incidence of tinnitus in the PDPH patients.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This pilot study demonstrates that patients who received an EBP for treatment of a PDPH following LP are no more likely to experience chronic headaches compared to patients who do not receive an EBP. However, both the EBP group and Non-EBP group had high incidence of chronic headaches which may be related to dural puncture or a baseline trait of this cohort given the recall bias. There is a suggestion that tinnitus could be a long-term residual symptom of PDPH treated with EBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":21069,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"50 4 Suppl 1","pages":"25-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7901131/pdf/PB-50-4S1-25.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Outcomes of Post Dural Puncture Headache Treated With Epidural Blood Patch: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jamal Hasoon,&nbsp;Ivan Urits,&nbsp;Rana Al-Jumah,&nbsp;Mark Burroughs,&nbsp;Viet Cai,&nbsp;Omar Viswanath,&nbsp;Musa Aner,&nbsp;Paragi H Rana,&nbsp;Thomas Simopoulos,&nbsp;Alan D Kaye,&nbsp;Jatinder Gill\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a known complication which may occur in the setting of patients undergoing lumbar punctures (LP) for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. The gold standard for treating a PDPH is an epidural blood patch (EBP). There have been few publications evaluating the long-term outcomes of PDPH treated with EBP. The aim of this pilot study was to examine the incidence of chronic headaches in dural puncture patients who received EBP versus those who did not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case control study was performed at a single large center institution. Forty-nine patients who had intentional dural puncture were identified on chart review and completed a survey questionnaire via phone interview: twenty-six of these patients required a subsequent EBP, while twenty-three did not. The primary outcomes were the development and prevalence of chronic headaches after the procedures. There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of current headaches between the EBP group and Non-EBP group (54% vs. 52% p = 0.91). There were no significant differences in the rates of severity and descriptive qualities of headache between the EBP and non-EBP groups. There was higher incidence of tinnitus in the PDPH patients.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This pilot study demonstrates that patients who received an EBP for treatment of a PDPH following LP are no more likely to experience chronic headaches compared to patients who do not receive an EBP. However, both the EBP group and Non-EBP group had high incidence of chronic headaches which may be related to dural puncture or a baseline trait of this cohort given the recall bias. There is a suggestion that tinnitus could be a long-term residual symptom of PDPH treated with EBP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychopharmacology bulletin\",\"volume\":\"50 4 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"25-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7901131/pdf/PB-50-4S1-25.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychopharmacology bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:硬脊膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)是一种已知的并发症,可能发生在进行腰椎穿刺(LP)诊断或治疗目的的患者中。治疗PDPH的金标准是硬膜外血贴片(EBP)。很少有文献评价EBP治疗PDPH的长期疗效。本初步研究的目的是检查接受EBP与未接受EBP的硬脑膜穿刺患者慢性头痛的发生率。方法:回顾性病例对照研究在单个大型中心机构进行。49例故意硬脑膜穿刺患者通过病历回顾和电话访谈完成调查问卷,其中26例患者需要后续EBP, 23例患者不需要。主要结果是手术后慢性头痛的发展和流行。EBP组和非EBP组当前头痛患病率无统计学差异(54% vs 52% p = 0.91)。在EBP组和非EBP组之间,头痛的严重程度和描述性质量没有显著差异。PDPH患者耳鸣发生率较高。摘要:这项初步研究表明,与未接受EBP治疗的患者相比,接受EBP治疗LP后PDPH的患者不太可能出现慢性头痛。然而,EBP组和非EBP组慢性头痛的发生率都很高,这可能与硬脑膜穿刺有关,或者考虑到回忆偏倚,这是该队列的基线特征。提示耳鸣可能是EBP治疗PDPH的长期残留症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-Term Outcomes of Post Dural Puncture Headache Treated With Epidural Blood Patch: A Pilot Study.

Background: Post dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a known complication which may occur in the setting of patients undergoing lumbar punctures (LP) for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. The gold standard for treating a PDPH is an epidural blood patch (EBP). There have been few publications evaluating the long-term outcomes of PDPH treated with EBP. The aim of this pilot study was to examine the incidence of chronic headaches in dural puncture patients who received EBP versus those who did not.

Methods: A retrospective case control study was performed at a single large center institution. Forty-nine patients who had intentional dural puncture were identified on chart review and completed a survey questionnaire via phone interview: twenty-six of these patients required a subsequent EBP, while twenty-three did not. The primary outcomes were the development and prevalence of chronic headaches after the procedures. There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of current headaches between the EBP group and Non-EBP group (54% vs. 52% p = 0.91). There were no significant differences in the rates of severity and descriptive qualities of headache between the EBP and non-EBP groups. There was higher incidence of tinnitus in the PDPH patients.

Summary: This pilot study demonstrates that patients who received an EBP for treatment of a PDPH following LP are no more likely to experience chronic headaches compared to patients who do not receive an EBP. However, both the EBP group and Non-EBP group had high incidence of chronic headaches which may be related to dural puncture or a baseline trait of this cohort given the recall bias. There is a suggestion that tinnitus could be a long-term residual symptom of PDPH treated with EBP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychopharmacology bulletin
Psychopharmacology bulletin PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信