注射类固醇和不注射类固醇的射频消融的长期疗效。

Q3 Medicine
Psychopharmacology bulletin Pub Date : 2020-10-15
Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Michael Loebertman, Peter Huynh, Ivan Urits, Omar Viswanath, Nalini Sehgal
{"title":"注射类固醇和不注射类固醇的射频消融的长期疗效。","authors":"Alaa Abd-Elsayed,&nbsp;Michael Loebertman,&nbsp;Peter Huynh,&nbsp;Ivan Urits,&nbsp;Omar Viswanath,&nbsp;Nalini Sehgal","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been proven to be an effective option for treating chronic low back pain. In addition to RFA as a treatment modality, the administration of concomitantly to minimize the effect of hyperalgesia is common practice. However, there is insufficient evidence about the long-term outcomes of their use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study that examined 239 patients who received spine, knee joint, and sacroiliac joint RFA between June 2014 and June 2018. Pre- and post-procedure pain scores, percent improvements, and duration of relief were included in our review.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>This study included 239 patients of which 191 patients received steroids with their RFA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>These 191 patients experienced an average improvement of 48.48% relief for an average of 137.52 days. Forty-eight patients did not receive steroids with RFA and had an average improvement of 46.36% for an average of 126.10 days. The statistical analysis revealed there was no significant difference between the two groups for percent improvement (p = 0.71) and duration of relief (p = 0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who received steroids with RFA compared to RFA alone did not differ significantly in percent improvement in pain and duration of relief.</p>","PeriodicalId":21069,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"50 4 Suppl 1","pages":"11-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7901125/pdf/PB-50-4S1-11.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Long-Term Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation With and Without Steroid Injection.\",\"authors\":\"Alaa Abd-Elsayed,&nbsp;Michael Loebertman,&nbsp;Peter Huynh,&nbsp;Ivan Urits,&nbsp;Omar Viswanath,&nbsp;Nalini Sehgal\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been proven to be an effective option for treating chronic low back pain. In addition to RFA as a treatment modality, the administration of concomitantly to minimize the effect of hyperalgesia is common practice. However, there is insufficient evidence about the long-term outcomes of their use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study that examined 239 patients who received spine, knee joint, and sacroiliac joint RFA between June 2014 and June 2018. Pre- and post-procedure pain scores, percent improvements, and duration of relief were included in our review.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>This study included 239 patients of which 191 patients received steroids with their RFA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>These 191 patients experienced an average improvement of 48.48% relief for an average of 137.52 days. Forty-eight patients did not receive steroids with RFA and had an average improvement of 46.36% for an average of 126.10 days. The statistical analysis revealed there was no significant difference between the two groups for percent improvement (p = 0.71) and duration of relief (p = 0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who received steroids with RFA compared to RFA alone did not differ significantly in percent improvement in pain and duration of relief.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychopharmacology bulletin\",\"volume\":\"50 4 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"11-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7901125/pdf/PB-50-4S1-11.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychopharmacology bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:射频消融(RFA)已被证明是治疗慢性腰痛的有效选择。除了RFA作为一种治疗方式外,通常的做法是同时给药以尽量减少痛觉过敏的影响。然而,关于使用它们的长期结果的证据不足。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,调查了2014年6月至2018年6月期间接受脊柱、膝关节和骶髂关节RFA的239例患者。术前和术后疼痛评分、改善百分比和缓解持续时间被纳入我们的回顾。受试者:本研究包括239例患者,其中191例患者在RFA时接受类固醇治疗。结果:191例患者平均改善48.48%,平均缓解137.52天。48例患者未接受RFA类固醇治疗,平均改善46.36%,平均126.10天。统计学分析显示两组在改善百分比(p = 0.71)和缓解持续时间(p = 0.67)方面无显著差异。结论:与单独接受RFA治疗的患者相比,接受RFA治疗的患者在疼痛改善百分比和缓解时间方面没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Long-Term Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation With and Without Steroid Injection.

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been proven to be an effective option for treating chronic low back pain. In addition to RFA as a treatment modality, the administration of concomitantly to minimize the effect of hyperalgesia is common practice. However, there is insufficient evidence about the long-term outcomes of their use.

Methods: This was a retrospective study that examined 239 patients who received spine, knee joint, and sacroiliac joint RFA between June 2014 and June 2018. Pre- and post-procedure pain scores, percent improvements, and duration of relief were included in our review.

Subjects: This study included 239 patients of which 191 patients received steroids with their RFA.

Results: These 191 patients experienced an average improvement of 48.48% relief for an average of 137.52 days. Forty-eight patients did not receive steroids with RFA and had an average improvement of 46.36% for an average of 126.10 days. The statistical analysis revealed there was no significant difference between the two groups for percent improvement (p = 0.71) and duration of relief (p = 0.67).

Conclusions: Patients who received steroids with RFA compared to RFA alone did not differ significantly in percent improvement in pain and duration of relief.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychopharmacology bulletin
Psychopharmacology bulletin PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信