顾客永远是对的?患者报告的结果测量有支持者也有反对者。

Q4 Medicine

Texas Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-01

Joey Berlin

{"title":"顾客永远是对的?患者报告的结果测量有支持者也有反对者。","authors":"Joey Berlin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For too long, some doctors say measures of a physician's quality of care have been about process: the average length of a patient stay, for example, or a patient's readmission rate. The bottom line is results, and that's why a shift to patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures is necessary. However, even proponents of PRO measures note that collecting the information from patients for those metrics places burdens on physicians, and some remain skeptical of bonuses and penalties tied to a measure that derives from a subjective factor: what patients think.","PeriodicalId":39209,"journal":{"name":"Texas Medicine","volume":"117 1","pages":"34-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Customer Is Always Right? Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Have Fans and Detractors.\",\"authors\":\"Joey Berlin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For too long, some doctors say measures of a physician's quality of care have been about process: the average length of a patient stay, for example, or a patient's readmission rate. The bottom line is results, and that's why a shift to patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures is necessary. However, even proponents of PRO measures note that collecting the information from patients for those metrics places burdens on physicians, and some remain skeptical of bonuses and penalties tied to a measure that derives from a subjective factor: what patients think.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Texas Medicine\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"34-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Texas Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texas Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

一些医生说，长期以来，衡量医生护理质量的标准一直是过程:例如，病人住院的平均时间，或者病人的再入院率。最重要的是结果，这就是为什么有必要转向患者报告的结果(PRO)衡量标准。然而，即使是PRO措施的支持者也注意到，从患者那里收集这些指标的信息给医生带来了负担，一些人仍然对与来自主观因素的衡量挂钩的奖金和处罚持怀疑态度:患者的想法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

本刊更多论文

The Customer Is Always Right? Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Have Fans and Detractors.

For too long, some doctors say measures of a physician's quality of care have been about process: the average length of a patient stay, for example, or a patient's readmission rate. The bottom line is results, and that's why a shift to patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures is necessary. However, even proponents of PRO measures note that collecting the information from patients for those metrics places burdens on physicians, and some remain skeptical of bonuses and penalties tied to a measure that derives from a subjective factor: what patients think.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Texas Medicine Medicine-Medicine (all)

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Texas Medicine is available to TMA members and presents timely information on public health, medicolegal issues, medical economics, science, medical education, and legislative affairs affecting Texas physicians and their patients.