口服肌肉松弛剂治疗脑瘫伴慢性疼痛。

Q3 Medicine
Psychopharmacology bulletin Pub Date : 2020-10-15
Jacki Peck, Ivan Urits, Joshua Crane, Alexandra McNally, Nazir Noor, Megha Patel, Amnon A Berger, Elyse M Cornett, Hisham Kassem, Alan D Kaye, Omar Viswanath
{"title":"口服肌肉松弛剂治疗脑瘫伴慢性疼痛。","authors":"Jacki Peck,&nbsp;Ivan Urits,&nbsp;Joshua Crane,&nbsp;Alexandra McNally,&nbsp;Nazir Noor,&nbsp;Megha Patel,&nbsp;Amnon A Berger,&nbsp;Elyse M Cornett,&nbsp;Hisham Kassem,&nbsp;Alan D Kaye,&nbsp;Omar Viswanath","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This is a comprehensive literature review of the available for treatment of oral muscle relaxants for cerebral palsy (CP) and associated chronic pain. It briefly describes the background and etiology of pain in CP and proceeds to review and weigh the available evidence for treatment for muscle relaxants.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>CP is a permanent, chronic, non-progressive neuromuscular and neurocognitive disorder of motor dysfunction that is diagnosed in infancy and is frequently (62% of patients) accompanied by chronic or recurrent muscular pain. Treatment of pain is crucial, and focuses mostly on treatment of spasticity through non-interventional techniques, surgery and medical treatment. Botulinum toxin injections provide temporary denervation, at the cost of repeated needle sticks. More recently, the use of oral muscle relaxants has gained ground and more evidence are available to evaluate its efficacy. Common oral muscle relaxants include baclofen, dantrolene and diazepam. Baclofen is commonly prescribed for spasticity in CP; however, despite year-long experience, there is little evidence to support its use and evidence from controlled trials are mixed. Dantrolene has been used for 30 years, and very little current evidence exists to support its use. Its efficacy is usually impacted by non-adherence due to difficult dosing and side-effects. Diazepam, a commonly prescribed benzodiazepine carries risks of CNS depression as well as addiction and abuse. Evidence supporting its use is mostly dated, but more recent findings support short-term use for pain control as well as enabling non-pharmacological interventions that achieve long term benefit but would otherwise not be tolerated. More recent options include cyclobenzaprine and tizanidine. Cyclobenzaprine carries a more significant adverse events profile, including CNS sedation; it was found to be effective, possible as effective as diazepam, however, it is not currently FDA approved for CP-related spasticity and further evidence is required to support its use. Tizanidine was shown to be very effective in a handful of small studies.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Muscle relaxants are an important adjunct in CP therapy and are crucial in treatment of pain, as well as enabling participation in other forms of treatments. Evidence exist to support their use, however, it is not without risk and further research is required to highlight proper dosing, co-treatments and patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":21069,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"50 4 Suppl 1","pages":"142-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7901132/pdf/PB-50-4S1-142.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral Muscle Relaxants for the Treatment of Chronic Pain Associated with Cerebral Palsy.\",\"authors\":\"Jacki Peck,&nbsp;Ivan Urits,&nbsp;Joshua Crane,&nbsp;Alexandra McNally,&nbsp;Nazir Noor,&nbsp;Megha Patel,&nbsp;Amnon A Berger,&nbsp;Elyse M Cornett,&nbsp;Hisham Kassem,&nbsp;Alan D Kaye,&nbsp;Omar Viswanath\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This is a comprehensive literature review of the available for treatment of oral muscle relaxants for cerebral palsy (CP) and associated chronic pain. It briefly describes the background and etiology of pain in CP and proceeds to review and weigh the available evidence for treatment for muscle relaxants.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>CP is a permanent, chronic, non-progressive neuromuscular and neurocognitive disorder of motor dysfunction that is diagnosed in infancy and is frequently (62% of patients) accompanied by chronic or recurrent muscular pain. Treatment of pain is crucial, and focuses mostly on treatment of spasticity through non-interventional techniques, surgery and medical treatment. Botulinum toxin injections provide temporary denervation, at the cost of repeated needle sticks. More recently, the use of oral muscle relaxants has gained ground and more evidence are available to evaluate its efficacy. Common oral muscle relaxants include baclofen, dantrolene and diazepam. Baclofen is commonly prescribed for spasticity in CP; however, despite year-long experience, there is little evidence to support its use and evidence from controlled trials are mixed. Dantrolene has been used for 30 years, and very little current evidence exists to support its use. Its efficacy is usually impacted by non-adherence due to difficult dosing and side-effects. Diazepam, a commonly prescribed benzodiazepine carries risks of CNS depression as well as addiction and abuse. Evidence supporting its use is mostly dated, but more recent findings support short-term use for pain control as well as enabling non-pharmacological interventions that achieve long term benefit but would otherwise not be tolerated. More recent options include cyclobenzaprine and tizanidine. Cyclobenzaprine carries a more significant adverse events profile, including CNS sedation; it was found to be effective, possible as effective as diazepam, however, it is not currently FDA approved for CP-related spasticity and further evidence is required to support its use. Tizanidine was shown to be very effective in a handful of small studies.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Muscle relaxants are an important adjunct in CP therapy and are crucial in treatment of pain, as well as enabling participation in other forms of treatments. Evidence exist to support their use, however, it is not without risk and further research is required to highlight proper dosing, co-treatments and patient selection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychopharmacology bulletin\",\"volume\":\"50 4 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"142-162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7901132/pdf/PB-50-4S1-142.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychopharmacology bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:这是一篇关于口服肌肉松弛剂治疗脑瘫(CP)及相关慢性疼痛的综合文献综述。它简要地描述了CP疼痛的背景和病因,并继续审查和权衡肌肉松弛剂治疗的现有证据。最近发现:CP是一种永久性的、慢性的、非进行性的神经肌肉和神经认知障碍的运动功能障碍,在婴儿期被诊断出来,并且经常(62%的患者)伴有慢性或复发性肌肉疼痛。疼痛的治疗是至关重要的,主要是通过非介入性技术、手术和药物治疗来治疗痉挛。注射肉毒杆菌毒素可以暂时切断神经,代价是要反复扎针。最近,口服肌肉松弛剂的使用已经取得了进展,并且有更多的证据可以评估其疗效。常见的口服肌肉松弛剂包括巴氯芬、丹曲林和地西泮。巴氯芬通常用于治疗CP痉挛;然而,尽管有长达一年的经验,几乎没有证据支持它的使用,对照试验的证据也好坏参半。丹trolene已经使用了30年,目前很少有证据支持它的使用。由于给药困难和副作用,其疗效通常受到不依从性的影响。地西泮是一种常用的苯二氮卓类药物,有中枢神经系统抑郁、成瘾和滥用的风险。支持其使用的证据大多是过时的,但最近的研究结果支持短期使用疼痛控制以及使非药物干预能够获得长期益处,但否则将无法耐受。最近的选择包括环苯扎林和替扎尼定。环苯扎林有更严重的不良事件,包括中枢神经系统镇静;它被发现是有效的,可能和地西泮一样有效,然而,目前FDA还没有批准它用于与cp相关的痉挛,需要进一步的证据来支持它的使用。在一些小型研究中,Tizanidine被证明是非常有效的。摘要:肌肉松弛剂是CP治疗的重要辅助药物,在治疗疼痛以及参与其他形式的治疗中起着至关重要的作用。有证据支持它们的使用,但并非没有风险,需要进一步研究以强调适当的剂量、联合治疗和患者选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oral Muscle Relaxants for the Treatment of Chronic Pain Associated with Cerebral Palsy.

Purpose of review: This is a comprehensive literature review of the available for treatment of oral muscle relaxants for cerebral palsy (CP) and associated chronic pain. It briefly describes the background and etiology of pain in CP and proceeds to review and weigh the available evidence for treatment for muscle relaxants.

Recent findings: CP is a permanent, chronic, non-progressive neuromuscular and neurocognitive disorder of motor dysfunction that is diagnosed in infancy and is frequently (62% of patients) accompanied by chronic or recurrent muscular pain. Treatment of pain is crucial, and focuses mostly on treatment of spasticity through non-interventional techniques, surgery and medical treatment. Botulinum toxin injections provide temporary denervation, at the cost of repeated needle sticks. More recently, the use of oral muscle relaxants has gained ground and more evidence are available to evaluate its efficacy. Common oral muscle relaxants include baclofen, dantrolene and diazepam. Baclofen is commonly prescribed for spasticity in CP; however, despite year-long experience, there is little evidence to support its use and evidence from controlled trials are mixed. Dantrolene has been used for 30 years, and very little current evidence exists to support its use. Its efficacy is usually impacted by non-adherence due to difficult dosing and side-effects. Diazepam, a commonly prescribed benzodiazepine carries risks of CNS depression as well as addiction and abuse. Evidence supporting its use is mostly dated, but more recent findings support short-term use for pain control as well as enabling non-pharmacological interventions that achieve long term benefit but would otherwise not be tolerated. More recent options include cyclobenzaprine and tizanidine. Cyclobenzaprine carries a more significant adverse events profile, including CNS sedation; it was found to be effective, possible as effective as diazepam, however, it is not currently FDA approved for CP-related spasticity and further evidence is required to support its use. Tizanidine was shown to be very effective in a handful of small studies.

Summary: Muscle relaxants are an important adjunct in CP therapy and are crucial in treatment of pain, as well as enabling participation in other forms of treatments. Evidence exist to support their use, however, it is not without risk and further research is required to highlight proper dosing, co-treatments and patient selection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychopharmacology bulletin
Psychopharmacology bulletin PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信