统计监督员的意见。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Upsala journal of medical sciences Pub Date : 2021-02-08 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.48101/ujms.v126.5665
Adam Taube
{"title":"统计监督员的意见。","authors":"Adam Taube","doi":"10.48101/ujms.v126.5665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During more than five decades, the author has kept a critical eye on how statistical methods are (mis-)used in medical research. Some areas are presented where serious statistical mistakes are prevalent. Two investigations with erroneous conclusions are described in detail. Situations where outside authorities have tried to mute medical researchers are also commented upon. The authors own efforts to improve the use of statistical methods and the current situation with easily accessible statistical program packages are described. Finally, the importance of continued 'statistical cleansing' is stressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23458,"journal":{"name":"Upsala journal of medical sciences","volume":"126 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observations by a statistical watchdog.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Taube\",\"doi\":\"10.48101/ujms.v126.5665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During more than five decades, the author has kept a critical eye on how statistical methods are (mis-)used in medical research. Some areas are presented where serious statistical mistakes are prevalent. Two investigations with erroneous conclusions are described in detail. Situations where outside authorities have tried to mute medical researchers are also commented upon. The authors own efforts to improve the use of statistical methods and the current situation with easily accessible statistical program packages are described. Finally, the importance of continued 'statistical cleansing' is stressed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Upsala journal of medical sciences\",\"volume\":\"126 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886277/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Upsala journal of medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48101/ujms.v126.5665\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upsala journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48101/ujms.v126.5665","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

五十多年来,作者一直对医学研究中如何(错误)使用统计方法持批判态度。本文介绍了一些普遍存在严重统计错误的领域。其中详细描述了两项结论错误的调查。此外,还评论了外部权威机构试图让医学研究人员哑口无言的情况。作者还介绍了自己为改进统计方法的使用所做的努力,以及目前易于使用的统计程序包的情况。最后,作者强调了继续进行 "统计净化 "的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Observations by a statistical watchdog.

During more than five decades, the author has kept a critical eye on how statistical methods are (mis-)used in medical research. Some areas are presented where serious statistical mistakes are prevalent. Two investigations with erroneous conclusions are described in detail. Situations where outside authorities have tried to mute medical researchers are also commented upon. The authors own efforts to improve the use of statistical methods and the current situation with easily accessible statistical program packages are described. Finally, the importance of continued 'statistical cleansing' is stressed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Upsala journal of medical sciences
Upsala journal of medical sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences is published for the Upsala Medical Society. It has been published since 1865 and is one of the oldest medical journals in Sweden. The journal publishes clinical and experimental original works in the medical field. Although focusing on regional issues, the journal always welcomes contributions from outside Sweden. Specially extended issues are published occasionally, dealing with special topics, congress proceedings and academic dissertations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信