基于学习的质子放射治疗双能CT停止功率映射。

IF 2.1 Q3 ONCOLOGY
International Journal of Particle Therapy Pub Date : 2021-02-12 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.14338/IJPT-D-20-00020.1
Tonghe Wang, Yang Lei, Joseph Harms, Beth Ghavidel, Liyong Lin, Jonathan J Beitler, Mark McDonald, Walter J Curran, Tian Liu, Jun Zhou, Xiaofeng Yang
{"title":"基于学习的质子放射治疗双能CT停止功率映射。","authors":"Tonghe Wang,&nbsp;Yang Lei,&nbsp;Joseph Harms,&nbsp;Beth Ghavidel,&nbsp;Liyong Lin,&nbsp;Jonathan J Beitler,&nbsp;Mark McDonald,&nbsp;Walter J Curran,&nbsp;Tian Liu,&nbsp;Jun Zhou,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Yang","doi":"10.14338/IJPT-D-20-00020.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has been used to derive relative stopping power (RSP) maps by obtaining the energy dependence of photon interactions. The DECT-derived RSP maps could potentially be compromised by image noise levels and the severity of artifacts when using physics-based mapping techniques. This work presents a noise-robust learning-based method to predict RSP maps from DECT for proton radiation therapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The proposed method uses a residual attention cycle-consistent generative adversarial network to bring DECT-to-RSP mapping close to a 1-to-1 mapping by introducing an inverse RSP-to-DECT mapping. To evaluate the proposed method, we retrospectively investigated 20 head-and-neck cancer patients with DECT scans in proton radiation therapy simulation. Ground truth RSP values were assigned by calculation based on chemical compositions and acted as learning targets in the training process for DECT datasets; they were evaluated against results from the proposed method using a leave-one-out cross-validation strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The predicted RSP maps showed an average normalized mean square error of 2.83% across the whole body volume and an average mean error less than 3% in all volumes of interest. With additional simulated noise added in DECT datasets, the proposed method still maintained a comparable performance, while the physics-based stoichiometric method suffered degraded inaccuracy from increased noise level. The average differences from ground truth in dose volume histogram metrics for clinical target volumes were less than 0.2 Gy for D<sub>95%</sub> and D<sub>max</sub> with no statistical significance. Maximum difference in dose volume histogram metrics of organs at risk was around 1 Gy on average.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results strongly indicate the high accuracy of RSP maps predicted by our machine-learning-based method and show its potential feasibility for proton treatment planning and dose calculation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36923,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","volume":"7 3","pages":"46-60"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886267/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning-Based Stopping Power Mapping on Dual-Energy CT for Proton Radiation Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Tonghe Wang,&nbsp;Yang Lei,&nbsp;Joseph Harms,&nbsp;Beth Ghavidel,&nbsp;Liyong Lin,&nbsp;Jonathan J Beitler,&nbsp;Mark McDonald,&nbsp;Walter J Curran,&nbsp;Tian Liu,&nbsp;Jun Zhou,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.14338/IJPT-D-20-00020.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has been used to derive relative stopping power (RSP) maps by obtaining the energy dependence of photon interactions. The DECT-derived RSP maps could potentially be compromised by image noise levels and the severity of artifacts when using physics-based mapping techniques. This work presents a noise-robust learning-based method to predict RSP maps from DECT for proton radiation therapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The proposed method uses a residual attention cycle-consistent generative adversarial network to bring DECT-to-RSP mapping close to a 1-to-1 mapping by introducing an inverse RSP-to-DECT mapping. To evaluate the proposed method, we retrospectively investigated 20 head-and-neck cancer patients with DECT scans in proton radiation therapy simulation. Ground truth RSP values were assigned by calculation based on chemical compositions and acted as learning targets in the training process for DECT datasets; they were evaluated against results from the proposed method using a leave-one-out cross-validation strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The predicted RSP maps showed an average normalized mean square error of 2.83% across the whole body volume and an average mean error less than 3% in all volumes of interest. With additional simulated noise added in DECT datasets, the proposed method still maintained a comparable performance, while the physics-based stoichiometric method suffered degraded inaccuracy from increased noise level. The average differences from ground truth in dose volume histogram metrics for clinical target volumes were less than 0.2 Gy for D<sub>95%</sub> and D<sub>max</sub> with no statistical significance. Maximum difference in dose volume histogram metrics of organs at risk was around 1 Gy on average.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results strongly indicate the high accuracy of RSP maps predicted by our machine-learning-based method and show its potential feasibility for proton treatment planning and dose calculation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Particle Therapy\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"46-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7886267/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Particle Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-D-20-00020.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-D-20-00020.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)通过获得光子相互作用的能量依赖性来推导相对停止功率(RSP)图。在使用基于物理的映射技术时,dect派生的RSP映射可能会受到图像噪声水平和工件严重程度的影响。这项工作提出了一种基于噪声鲁棒学习的方法来预测质子放射治疗中DECT的RSP图。材料和方法:提出的方法使用剩余注意周期一致生成对抗网络,通过引入反向rsp到dect映射,使dect到rsp映射接近1对1映射。为了评估所提出的方法,我们回顾性研究了20例头颈癌患者在质子放射治疗模拟中的DECT扫描。在DECT数据集的训练过程中,基于化学成分的计算赋值作为学习目标;他们是根据使用留一交叉验证策略提出的方法的结果进行评估的。结果:预测的RSP图在整个身体体积上的平均归一化均方误差为2.83%,在所有感兴趣的体积上的平均误差小于3%。在DECT数据集中添加了额外的模拟噪声后,所提出的方法仍然保持了相当的性能,而基于物理的化学计量方法由于噪声水平的增加而降低了准确性。临床靶体积的剂量-体积直方图指标与地面真实值的平均差异在D95%和Dmax均小于0.2 Gy,无统计学意义。危险器官的剂量-体积直方图度量的最大差异平均约为1 Gy。结论:基于机器学习的方法预测的RSP图谱具有较高的准确性,在质子治疗计划和剂量计算中具有潜在的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Learning-Based Stopping Power Mapping on Dual-Energy CT for Proton Radiation Therapy.

Learning-Based Stopping Power Mapping on Dual-Energy CT for Proton Radiation Therapy.

Learning-Based Stopping Power Mapping on Dual-Energy CT for Proton Radiation Therapy.

Learning-Based Stopping Power Mapping on Dual-Energy CT for Proton Radiation Therapy.

Purpose: Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has been used to derive relative stopping power (RSP) maps by obtaining the energy dependence of photon interactions. The DECT-derived RSP maps could potentially be compromised by image noise levels and the severity of artifacts when using physics-based mapping techniques. This work presents a noise-robust learning-based method to predict RSP maps from DECT for proton radiation therapy.

Materials and methods: The proposed method uses a residual attention cycle-consistent generative adversarial network to bring DECT-to-RSP mapping close to a 1-to-1 mapping by introducing an inverse RSP-to-DECT mapping. To evaluate the proposed method, we retrospectively investigated 20 head-and-neck cancer patients with DECT scans in proton radiation therapy simulation. Ground truth RSP values were assigned by calculation based on chemical compositions and acted as learning targets in the training process for DECT datasets; they were evaluated against results from the proposed method using a leave-one-out cross-validation strategy.

Results: The predicted RSP maps showed an average normalized mean square error of 2.83% across the whole body volume and an average mean error less than 3% in all volumes of interest. With additional simulated noise added in DECT datasets, the proposed method still maintained a comparable performance, while the physics-based stoichiometric method suffered degraded inaccuracy from increased noise level. The average differences from ground truth in dose volume histogram metrics for clinical target volumes were less than 0.2 Gy for D95% and Dmax with no statistical significance. Maximum difference in dose volume histogram metrics of organs at risk was around 1 Gy on average.

Conclusion: These results strongly indicate the high accuracy of RSP maps predicted by our machine-learning-based method and show its potential feasibility for proton treatment planning and dose calculation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Particle Therapy
International Journal of Particle Therapy Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
23
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信