{"title":"网络推送调查对医生调查回复率的影响:一项随机实验。","authors":"Cristine D Delnevo, Binu Singh","doi":"10.29115/sp-2021-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Achieving a high response rate for physicians has been challenging, and with response rates declining in recent years, innovative methods are needed to increase rates. An emerging concept in survey methodology has been web-push survey delivery. With this delivery method, contact is made by mail to request a response by web. This study explored the feasibility of a web-push survey on a national sample of physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,000 physicians across six specialties were randomly assigned to a mail-only or web-push survey delivery. Each mode consisted of four contacts including an initial mailing, reminder postcard, and two additional follow-ups. Response rates were calculated using the American Association for Public Opinion Research's response rate 3 calculation. Data collection occurred between Febuary and April 2018; data were analyzed March 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall reponse rates for the mail-only versus web-push survey delivery were comparable (51.2% vs. 52.8%). Higher response rates across all demographics were seen in the web-push delivery, with the exception of pulmonary/critical care and physicians over the age of 65. The web-push survey yielded a greater response after the first mailing, requiring fewer follow-up contacts resulting in a more cost-effective delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A web-push mail survey is effective in achieving a comparable response rate to traditional mail-only delivery for physicians. The web-push survey was more efficient in terms of cost and in receiving responses in a more timely manner. Future research should explore the efficiency of a web-push survey delivery across various health care provider populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":74893,"journal":{"name":"Survey practice","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7889051/pdf/nihms-1670294.pdf","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of a web-push survey on physician survey responses rates: a randomized experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Cristine D Delnevo, Binu Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.29115/sp-2021-0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Achieving a high response rate for physicians has been challenging, and with response rates declining in recent years, innovative methods are needed to increase rates. An emerging concept in survey methodology has been web-push survey delivery. With this delivery method, contact is made by mail to request a response by web. This study explored the feasibility of a web-push survey on a national sample of physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,000 physicians across six specialties were randomly assigned to a mail-only or web-push survey delivery. Each mode consisted of four contacts including an initial mailing, reminder postcard, and two additional follow-ups. Response rates were calculated using the American Association for Public Opinion Research's response rate 3 calculation. Data collection occurred between Febuary and April 2018; data were analyzed March 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall reponse rates for the mail-only versus web-push survey delivery were comparable (51.2% vs. 52.8%). Higher response rates across all demographics were seen in the web-push delivery, with the exception of pulmonary/critical care and physicians over the age of 65. The web-push survey yielded a greater response after the first mailing, requiring fewer follow-up contacts resulting in a more cost-effective delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A web-push mail survey is effective in achieving a comparable response rate to traditional mail-only delivery for physicians. The web-push survey was more efficient in terms of cost and in receiving responses in a more timely manner. Future research should explore the efficiency of a web-push survey delivery across various health care provider populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Survey practice\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7889051/pdf/nihms-1670294.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Survey practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29115/sp-2021-0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/2/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29115/sp-2021-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
摘要
背景:实现医生的高反应率一直具有挑战性,近年来反应率下降,需要创新的方法来提高反应率。调查方法中的一个新兴概念是网络推送调查交付。使用这种交付方法,通过邮件进行联系,以通过web请求响应。本研究探讨了在全国医生样本中进行网络推送调查的可行性。方法:6个专业共1000名医生被随机分配到仅通过邮件或网络推送进行调查。每种模式包括四种联系方式,包括初始邮件、提醒明信片和两次额外的后续联系。回复率是根据美国民意调查协会的回复率计算得出的。数据收集发生在2018年2月至4月之间;数据于2019年3月进行分析。结果:邮件调查与网络推送调查的总体回复率相当(51.2% vs 52.8%)。除了肺病/重症监护和65岁以上的医生外,所有人口统计数据显示,网络推送的回复率更高。网络推送调查在第一次邮寄后得到了更大的回应,需要更少的后续联系,从而提高了交付的成本效益。结论:一个网络推送邮件调查是有效的,以达到相当的回复率,传统的邮件只交付的医生。网络推送调查在成本和及时收到回复方面效率更高。未来的研究应该探索网络推送调查在不同医疗保健提供者人群中的有效性。
The effect of a web-push survey on physician survey responses rates: a randomized experiment.
Background: Achieving a high response rate for physicians has been challenging, and with response rates declining in recent years, innovative methods are needed to increase rates. An emerging concept in survey methodology has been web-push survey delivery. With this delivery method, contact is made by mail to request a response by web. This study explored the feasibility of a web-push survey on a national sample of physicians.
Methods: A total of 1,000 physicians across six specialties were randomly assigned to a mail-only or web-push survey delivery. Each mode consisted of four contacts including an initial mailing, reminder postcard, and two additional follow-ups. Response rates were calculated using the American Association for Public Opinion Research's response rate 3 calculation. Data collection occurred between Febuary and April 2018; data were analyzed March 2019.
Results: Overall reponse rates for the mail-only versus web-push survey delivery were comparable (51.2% vs. 52.8%). Higher response rates across all demographics were seen in the web-push delivery, with the exception of pulmonary/critical care and physicians over the age of 65. The web-push survey yielded a greater response after the first mailing, requiring fewer follow-up contacts resulting in a more cost-effective delivery.
Conclusions: A web-push mail survey is effective in achieving a comparable response rate to traditional mail-only delivery for physicians. The web-push survey was more efficient in terms of cost and in receiving responses in a more timely manner. Future research should explore the efficiency of a web-push survey delivery across various health care provider populations.