目标效度:使外部效度的处理与内部效度一致。

3区 医学
Current Epidemiology Reports Pub Date : 2020-09-01 Epub Date: 2020-06-30 DOI:10.1007/s40471-020-00239-0
Catherine R Lesko, Benjamin Ackerman, Michael Webster-Clark, Jessie K Edwards
{"title":"目标效度:使外部效度的处理与内部效度一致。","authors":"Catherine R Lesko,&nbsp;Benjamin Ackerman,&nbsp;Michael Webster-Clark,&nbsp;Jessie K Edwards","doi":"10.1007/s40471-020-00239-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>\"Target bias\" is the difference between an estimate of association from a study sample and the causal effect in the target population of interest. It is the sum of internal and external bias. Given the extensive literature on internal validity, here, we review threats and methods to improve external validity.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>External bias may arise when the distribution of modifiers of the effect of treatment differs between the study sample and the target population. Methods including those based on modeling the outcome, modeling sample membership, and doubly robust methods are available, assuming data on the target population is available.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The relevance of information for making policy decisions is dependent on both the actions that were studied and the sample in which they were evaluated. Combining methods for addressing internal and external validity can improve the policy relevance of study results.</p>","PeriodicalId":48527,"journal":{"name":"Current Epidemiology Reports","volume":"7 3","pages":"117-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40471-020-00239-0","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Target validity: Bringing treatment of external validity in line with internal validity.\",\"authors\":\"Catherine R Lesko,&nbsp;Benjamin Ackerman,&nbsp;Michael Webster-Clark,&nbsp;Jessie K Edwards\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40471-020-00239-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>\\\"Target bias\\\" is the difference between an estimate of association from a study sample and the causal effect in the target population of interest. It is the sum of internal and external bias. Given the extensive literature on internal validity, here, we review threats and methods to improve external validity.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>External bias may arise when the distribution of modifiers of the effect of treatment differs between the study sample and the target population. Methods including those based on modeling the outcome, modeling sample membership, and doubly robust methods are available, assuming data on the target population is available.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The relevance of information for making policy decisions is dependent on both the actions that were studied and the sample in which they were evaluated. Combining methods for addressing internal and external validity can improve the policy relevance of study results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Epidemiology Reports\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"117-124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40471-020-00239-0\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Epidemiology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-020-00239-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/6/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Epidemiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-020-00239-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

回顾目的:“目标偏倚”是研究样本的关联估计值与感兴趣的目标人群的因果效应之间的差异。它是内部和外部偏见的总和。鉴于内部效度的广泛文献,在这里,我们回顾了提高外部效度的威胁和方法。最近的发现:当治疗效果的修饰因子在研究样本和目标人群之间的分布不同时,可能会产生外部偏倚。假设目标人群的数据可用,方法包括基于结果建模、样本隶属度建模和双重鲁棒方法的方法。摘要:制定政策决策的信息的相关性取决于所研究的行动和评估这些行动的样本。结合处理内部效度和外部效度的方法可以提高研究结果的政策相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Target validity: Bringing treatment of external validity in line with internal validity.

Purpose of review: "Target bias" is the difference between an estimate of association from a study sample and the causal effect in the target population of interest. It is the sum of internal and external bias. Given the extensive literature on internal validity, here, we review threats and methods to improve external validity.

Recent findings: External bias may arise when the distribution of modifiers of the effect of treatment differs between the study sample and the target population. Methods including those based on modeling the outcome, modeling sample membership, and doubly robust methods are available, assuming data on the target population is available.

Summary: The relevance of information for making policy decisions is dependent on both the actions that were studied and the sample in which they were evaluated. Combining methods for addressing internal and external validity can improve the policy relevance of study results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Epidemiology Reports
Current Epidemiology Reports OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信