Chris McGibbon, Andrew Sexton, Arun Jayaraman, Susan Deems-Dluhy, Eric Fabara, Catherine Adans-Dester, Paolo Bonato, Francois Marquis, Sylvie Turmel, Etienne Belzile
{"title":"膝骨关节炎患者下肢机器人外骨骼的评估。","authors":"Chris McGibbon, Andrew Sexton, Arun Jayaraman, Susan Deems-Dluhy, Eric Fabara, Catherine Adans-Dester, Paolo Bonato, Francois Marquis, Sylvie Turmel, Etienne Belzile","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2021.1887400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A multi-site study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the Keeogo™ exoskeleton as a mobility assist device for use in the clinic and at home in people with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Twenty-four participants were randomized in a two-stage cross-over design that evaluated the immediate effects of using the exoskeleton in the clinic and the cumulative effects of training and home use. Immediate effects were quantified by comparing 1) physical performance with|without (W|WO) the device during a battery of mobility tests, and 2) physical activity levels at home (actigraphy) for one month, two weeks W|WO the device. Cumulative effects were quantified as change in physical performance W and WO over time. WOMAC and other self-report scales were measured and usability assessed. There were no immediate effects on physical performance or physical activity at home; however, there were cumulative effects as indicated by improved stair time (<i>p</i> = .001) as well as improved WOMAC pain (<i>p</i> = .004) and function (<i>p</i> = .003). There was a direct relationship between improved physical function and improved WOMAC pain (r = -.677, <i>p</i> < .001) and stiffness (r = .537, <i>p</i> = .007). Weight and battery life were identified as important to usability. A full-scale RCT with more participants, longer study period, and better usage monitoring is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":282300,"journal":{"name":"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA","volume":" ","pages":"543-556"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10400435.2021.1887400","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a lower-extremity robotic exoskeleton for people with knee osteoarthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Chris McGibbon, Andrew Sexton, Arun Jayaraman, Susan Deems-Dluhy, Eric Fabara, Catherine Adans-Dester, Paolo Bonato, Francois Marquis, Sylvie Turmel, Etienne Belzile\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10400435.2021.1887400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A multi-site study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the Keeogo™ exoskeleton as a mobility assist device for use in the clinic and at home in people with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Twenty-four participants were randomized in a two-stage cross-over design that evaluated the immediate effects of using the exoskeleton in the clinic and the cumulative effects of training and home use. Immediate effects were quantified by comparing 1) physical performance with|without (W|WO) the device during a battery of mobility tests, and 2) physical activity levels at home (actigraphy) for one month, two weeks W|WO the device. Cumulative effects were quantified as change in physical performance W and WO over time. WOMAC and other self-report scales were measured and usability assessed. There were no immediate effects on physical performance or physical activity at home; however, there were cumulative effects as indicated by improved stair time (<i>p</i> = .001) as well as improved WOMAC pain (<i>p</i> = .004) and function (<i>p</i> = .003). There was a direct relationship between improved physical function and improved WOMAC pain (r = -.677, <i>p</i> < .001) and stiffness (r = .537, <i>p</i> = .007). Weight and battery life were identified as important to usability. A full-scale RCT with more participants, longer study period, and better usage monitoring is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":282300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"543-556\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10400435.2021.1887400\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2021.1887400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/4/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2021.1887400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
进行了一项多地点研究,以评估Keeogo™外骨骼作为膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)患者在临床和家庭中使用的活动辅助装置的功效。24名参与者被随机分为两阶段交叉设计,以评估在临床使用外骨骼的直接效果以及训练和家庭使用的累积效果。通过比较1)在移动能力测试中,使用/不使用(W / WO)设备时的身体表现,以及2)使用/不使用设备一个月、两周的在家身体活动水平(活动记录仪),对即时效果进行了量化。累积效应被量化为物理性能W和WO随时间的变化。测量WOMAC和其他自我报告量表并评估可用性。对身体表现或在家的身体活动没有直接影响;然而,有累积效应,如改善楼梯时间(p = 0.001),改善WOMAC疼痛(p = 0.004)和功能(p = 0.003)。身体功能的改善与WOMAC疼痛的改善有直接关系(r = -)。677, p p = .007)。重量和电池寿命被认为对可用性很重要。需要更多参与者、更长的研究时间和更好的使用监测的全面随机对照试验。
Evaluation of a lower-extremity robotic exoskeleton for people with knee osteoarthritis.
A multi-site study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the Keeogo™ exoskeleton as a mobility assist device for use in the clinic and at home in people with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Twenty-four participants were randomized in a two-stage cross-over design that evaluated the immediate effects of using the exoskeleton in the clinic and the cumulative effects of training and home use. Immediate effects were quantified by comparing 1) physical performance with|without (W|WO) the device during a battery of mobility tests, and 2) physical activity levels at home (actigraphy) for one month, two weeks W|WO the device. Cumulative effects were quantified as change in physical performance W and WO over time. WOMAC and other self-report scales were measured and usability assessed. There were no immediate effects on physical performance or physical activity at home; however, there were cumulative effects as indicated by improved stair time (p = .001) as well as improved WOMAC pain (p = .004) and function (p = .003). There was a direct relationship between improved physical function and improved WOMAC pain (r = -.677, p < .001) and stiffness (r = .537, p = .007). Weight and battery life were identified as important to usability. A full-scale RCT with more participants, longer study period, and better usage monitoring is warranted.