{"title":"CBM迷宫能评估8 - 9岁儿童的阅读理解能力吗?","authors":"Shelby Pollitt, Gina Harrison","doi":"10.1002/dys.1679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent research has reported the word-level, code-related focus of curriculum-based measures (CBM) of reading comprehension such as Maze (Muijselaar et al., 2017) with typically developing readers, but research has yet to examine whether this finding also applies to children at-risk for dyslexia. We administered a collection of cognitive, linguistic, CBM, and norm-referenced measures to children whose word reading and decoding fluency fell below the 25th percentile and were, therefore, considered at-risk readers. We found that language comprehension contributed additional variance beyond decoding (fluency and accuracy measures) to reading comprehension as assessed by the WIAT-III, but that decoding explained the most variance in children's performance on the CBM Maze task (vis à vis the simple view of reading). The findings have practical implications to the use of CBM Maze as a formative assessment with children at-risk for dyslexia and elucidate the need for additional or alternative assessments to capture the reading comprehension construct.</p>","PeriodicalId":47222,"journal":{"name":"Dyslexia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dys.1679","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does CBM maze assess reading comprehension in 8–9-year olds at-risk for dyslexia?\",\"authors\":\"Shelby Pollitt, Gina Harrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dys.1679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Recent research has reported the word-level, code-related focus of curriculum-based measures (CBM) of reading comprehension such as Maze (Muijselaar et al., 2017) with typically developing readers, but research has yet to examine whether this finding also applies to children at-risk for dyslexia. We administered a collection of cognitive, linguistic, CBM, and norm-referenced measures to children whose word reading and decoding fluency fell below the 25th percentile and were, therefore, considered at-risk readers. We found that language comprehension contributed additional variance beyond decoding (fluency and accuracy measures) to reading comprehension as assessed by the WIAT-III, but that decoding explained the most variance in children's performance on the CBM Maze task (vis à vis the simple view of reading). The findings have practical implications to the use of CBM Maze as a formative assessment with children at-risk for dyslexia and elucidate the need for additional or alternative assessments to capture the reading comprehension construct.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dyslexia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dys.1679\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dyslexia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dys.1679\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dys.1679","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does CBM maze assess reading comprehension in 8–9-year olds at-risk for dyslexia?
Recent research has reported the word-level, code-related focus of curriculum-based measures (CBM) of reading comprehension such as Maze (Muijselaar et al., 2017) with typically developing readers, but research has yet to examine whether this finding also applies to children at-risk for dyslexia. We administered a collection of cognitive, linguistic, CBM, and norm-referenced measures to children whose word reading and decoding fluency fell below the 25th percentile and were, therefore, considered at-risk readers. We found that language comprehension contributed additional variance beyond decoding (fluency and accuracy measures) to reading comprehension as assessed by the WIAT-III, but that decoding explained the most variance in children's performance on the CBM Maze task (vis à vis the simple view of reading). The findings have practical implications to the use of CBM Maze as a formative assessment with children at-risk for dyslexia and elucidate the need for additional or alternative assessments to capture the reading comprehension construct.
期刊介绍:
DYSLEXIA provides reviews and reports of research, assessment and intervention practice. In many fields of enquiry theoretical advances often occur in response to practical needs; and a central aim of the journal is to bring together researchers and practitioners in the field of dyslexia, so that each can learn from the other. Interesting developments, both theoretical and practical, are being reported in many different countries: DYSLEXIA is a forum in which a knowledge of these developments can be shared by readers in all parts of the world. The scope of the journal includes relevant aspects of Cognitive, Educational, Developmental and Clinical Psychology Child and Adult Special Education and Remedial Education Therapy and Counselling Neuroscience, Psychiatry and General Medicine The scope of the journal includes relevant aspects of: - Cognitive, Educational, Developmental and Clinical Psychology - Child and Adult Special Education and Remedial Education - Therapy and Counselling - Neuroscience, Psychiatry and General Medicine