输卵管腔脓肿的外科、超声引导引流及内科治疗。

ISRN infectious diseases Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-03-04 DOI:10.1155/2014/501729
Frank A Crespo, Dervi Ganesh, Kaming Lo, Kevin Chin, Paul Norris, Nahida Chakhtoura
{"title":"输卵管腔脓肿的外科、超声引导引流及内科治疗。","authors":"Frank A Crespo, Dervi Ganesh, Kaming Lo, Kevin Chin, Paul Norris, Nahida Chakhtoura","doi":"10.1155/2014/501729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare surgical, ultrasound guided drainage, and medical management of tuboovarian abscesses (TOA) and determine if different characteristics in patient presentation influence treatment and outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of 158 patients admitted to Jackson Memorial Hospital between 2007 and 2012 with a TOA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients treated with IV antibiotics (IV) alone were hospitalized for 5.59 days (SD 2.52), IV antibiotics and US guided drainage (IV/US) were hospitalized for 9.63 days (SD 7.58), and IV antibiotics and surgery (IV/surgery) were hospitalized for 8.14 days ((SD3.9), (<i>P</i> < 0.001)). A total of 52 patients were readmitted with TOA; 41.8% were treated with IV; 26.9% were readmitted with IV/US; 7.1% were readmitted with IV/surgery (<i>P</i> < 0.022). Patients with a TOA measuring 0-8 cm were hospitalized for 5.97 days (SD 4.24), while those greater than 8 cm were hospitalized for 7.71 days ((SD 4.69), (<i>P</i> < 0.029)). Patients treated with a triple antibiotic regimen were hospitalized for 8.42 days (SD 5.70) versus 5.8 days (SD 3.24) when receiving an alternative regimen (<i>P</i> < 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Longer hospitalization in patients treated uniformly with either triple antibiotics, ultrasound guided drainage, or surgery represents a delay in optimal treatment. Tailoring treatment plans based on patient presentation may allow for shorter hospital stays and improved morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":87285,"journal":{"name":"ISRN infectious diseases","volume":"2014 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/501729","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical, Ultrasound Guided Drainage, and Medical Management of Tuboovarian Abscesses.\",\"authors\":\"Frank A Crespo, Dervi Ganesh, Kaming Lo, Kevin Chin, Paul Norris, Nahida Chakhtoura\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2014/501729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare surgical, ultrasound guided drainage, and medical management of tuboovarian abscesses (TOA) and determine if different characteristics in patient presentation influence treatment and outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of 158 patients admitted to Jackson Memorial Hospital between 2007 and 2012 with a TOA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients treated with IV antibiotics (IV) alone were hospitalized for 5.59 days (SD 2.52), IV antibiotics and US guided drainage (IV/US) were hospitalized for 9.63 days (SD 7.58), and IV antibiotics and surgery (IV/surgery) were hospitalized for 8.14 days ((SD3.9), (<i>P</i> < 0.001)). A total of 52 patients were readmitted with TOA; 41.8% were treated with IV; 26.9% were readmitted with IV/US; 7.1% were readmitted with IV/surgery (<i>P</i> < 0.022). Patients with a TOA measuring 0-8 cm were hospitalized for 5.97 days (SD 4.24), while those greater than 8 cm were hospitalized for 7.71 days ((SD 4.69), (<i>P</i> < 0.029)). Patients treated with a triple antibiotic regimen were hospitalized for 8.42 days (SD 5.70) versus 5.8 days (SD 3.24) when receiving an alternative regimen (<i>P</i> < 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Longer hospitalization in patients treated uniformly with either triple antibiotics, ultrasound guided drainage, or surgery represents a delay in optimal treatment. Tailoring treatment plans based on patient presentation may allow for shorter hospital stays and improved morbidity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN infectious diseases\",\"volume\":\"2014 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/501729\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN infectious diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/501729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/501729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:比较手术、超声引导引流和药物治疗对输卵管卵巢脓肿(TOA)的影响,并确定患者表现的不同特征是否会影响治疗和结果。方法:回顾性队列研究2007年至2012年在杰克逊纪念医院收治的158例TOA患者。结果:单纯静脉注射抗生素(IV)患者住院时间5.59天(SD 2.52),静脉注射抗生素联合US引导引流(IV/US)患者住院时间9.63天(SD 7.58),静脉注射抗生素联合手术(IV/手术)患者住院时间8.14天(SD3.9), (P < 0.001)。共有52例患者因TOA再次入院;静脉注射占41.8%;26.9%的患者因静脉注射/US再次入院;7.1%再次接受静脉注射/手术(P < 0.022)。TOA为0 ~ 8 cm的患者住院时间为5.97 d (SD 4.24), TOA大于8 cm的患者住院时间为7.71 d (SD 4.69), (P < 0.029)。接受三联抗生素方案治疗的患者住院时间为8.42天(SD 5.70),而接受替代方案治疗的患者住院时间为5.8天(SD 3.24) (P < 0.002)。结论:采用三联抗生素、超声引导引流或手术统一治疗的患者住院时间较长,代表了最佳治疗的延迟。根据病人的表现制定治疗计划可以缩短住院时间并改善发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical, Ultrasound Guided Drainage, and Medical Management of Tuboovarian Abscesses.

Objective: To compare surgical, ultrasound guided drainage, and medical management of tuboovarian abscesses (TOA) and determine if different characteristics in patient presentation influence treatment and outcome.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 158 patients admitted to Jackson Memorial Hospital between 2007 and 2012 with a TOA.

Results: Patients treated with IV antibiotics (IV) alone were hospitalized for 5.59 days (SD 2.52), IV antibiotics and US guided drainage (IV/US) were hospitalized for 9.63 days (SD 7.58), and IV antibiotics and surgery (IV/surgery) were hospitalized for 8.14 days ((SD3.9), (P < 0.001)). A total of 52 patients were readmitted with TOA; 41.8% were treated with IV; 26.9% were readmitted with IV/US; 7.1% were readmitted with IV/surgery (P < 0.022). Patients with a TOA measuring 0-8 cm were hospitalized for 5.97 days (SD 4.24), while those greater than 8 cm were hospitalized for 7.71 days ((SD 4.69), (P < 0.029)). Patients treated with a triple antibiotic regimen were hospitalized for 8.42 days (SD 5.70) versus 5.8 days (SD 3.24) when receiving an alternative regimen (P < 0.002).

Conclusions: Longer hospitalization in patients treated uniformly with either triple antibiotics, ultrasound guided drainage, or surgery represents a delay in optimal treatment. Tailoring treatment plans based on patient presentation may allow for shorter hospital stays and improved morbidity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信