我不是一个诊断:青少年对用户参与和共同决策在精神卫生保健的观点。

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Stig Bjønness, Trond Grønnestad, Marianne Storm
{"title":"我不是一个诊断:青少年对用户参与和共同决策在精神卫生保健的观点。","authors":"Stig Bjønness,&nbsp;Trond Grønnestad,&nbsp;Marianne Storm","doi":"10.21307/sjcapp-2020-014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescents have the right to be involved in decisions affecting their healthcare. More knowledge is needed to provide quality healthcare services that is both suitable for adolescents and in line with policy. Shared decision-making has the potential to combine user participation and evidence-based treatment. Research and governmental policies emphasize shared decision-making as key for high quality mental healthcare services.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore adolescents' experiences with user participation and shared decision-making in mental healthcare inpatient units.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We carried out ten in-depth interviews with adolescents (16-18 years old) in this qualitative study. The participants were admitted to four mental healthcare inpatient clinics in Norway. Transcribed interviews were subjected to qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five themes were identified, representing the adolescents' view of gaining trust, getting help, being understood, being diagnosed and labeled, being pushed, and making a customized treatment plan. Psychoeducational information, mutual trust, and a therapeutic relationship between patients and therapists were considered prerequisites for shared decision-making. For adolescents to be labeled with a diagnosis or forced into a treatment regimen that they did not initiate or control tended to elicit strong resistance. User involvement at admission, participation in the treatment plan, individualized treatment, and collaboration among healthcare professionals were emphasized.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Routines for participation and involvement of adolescents prior to inpatient admission is recommended. Shared decision-making has the potential to increase adolescents' engagement and reduce the incidence of involuntary treatment and re-admission to inpatient clinics. In this study, shared decision-making is linked to empowerment and less to standardized decision tools. To be labeled and dominated by healthcare professionals can be a barrier to adolescents' participation in treatment. We suggest placing less emphasis on diagnoses and more on individualized treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":42655,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6c/28/sjcapp-08-014.PMC7863730.pdf","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"I'm not a diagnosis: Adolescents' perspectives on user participation and shared decision-making in mental healthcare.\",\"authors\":\"Stig Bjønness,&nbsp;Trond Grønnestad,&nbsp;Marianne Storm\",\"doi\":\"10.21307/sjcapp-2020-014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescents have the right to be involved in decisions affecting their healthcare. More knowledge is needed to provide quality healthcare services that is both suitable for adolescents and in line with policy. Shared decision-making has the potential to combine user participation and evidence-based treatment. Research and governmental policies emphasize shared decision-making as key for high quality mental healthcare services.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore adolescents' experiences with user participation and shared decision-making in mental healthcare inpatient units.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We carried out ten in-depth interviews with adolescents (16-18 years old) in this qualitative study. The participants were admitted to four mental healthcare inpatient clinics in Norway. Transcribed interviews were subjected to qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five themes were identified, representing the adolescents' view of gaining trust, getting help, being understood, being diagnosed and labeled, being pushed, and making a customized treatment plan. Psychoeducational information, mutual trust, and a therapeutic relationship between patients and therapists were considered prerequisites for shared decision-making. For adolescents to be labeled with a diagnosis or forced into a treatment regimen that they did not initiate or control tended to elicit strong resistance. User involvement at admission, participation in the treatment plan, individualized treatment, and collaboration among healthcare professionals were emphasized.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Routines for participation and involvement of adolescents prior to inpatient admission is recommended. Shared decision-making has the potential to increase adolescents' engagement and reduce the incidence of involuntary treatment and re-admission to inpatient clinics. In this study, shared decision-making is linked to empowerment and less to standardized decision tools. To be labeled and dominated by healthcare professionals can be a barrier to adolescents' participation in treatment. We suggest placing less emphasis on diagnoses and more on individualized treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6c/28/sjcapp-08-014.PMC7863730.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21307/sjcapp-2020-014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/sjcapp-2020-014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

背景:青少年有权参与影响其保健的决定。需要更多的知识来提供既适合青少年又符合政策的优质保健服务。共同决策有可能将用户参与和循证治疗结合起来。研究和政府政策强调共同决策是高质量精神卫生保健服务的关键。目的:探讨青少年在精神卫生住院病房的用户参与和共同决策体验。方法:在本定性研究中,我们对16-18岁的青少年进行了10次深度访谈。参与者被收住在挪威的四家精神保健住院诊所。采访记录进行了定性内容分析。结果:确定了五个主题,分别代表了青少年对获得信任、获得帮助、被理解、被诊断和标签、被推动和制定个性化治疗方案的看法。心理教育信息、相互信任以及患者和治疗师之间的治疗关系被认为是共同决策的先决条件。对于青少年来说,被贴上诊断标签或被迫接受他们没有发起或控制的治疗方案往往会引起强烈的抵制。使用者在入院时的参与、治疗计划的参与、个体化治疗以及医疗保健专业人员之间的合作被强调。结论:建议青少年在住院前进行常规的参与和参与。共同决策有可能增加青少年的参与,减少非自愿治疗和再次住院的发生率。在这项研究中,共同决策与授权有关,而与标准化决策工具的关系较小。被医疗保健专业人员贴上标签和主导可能是青少年参与治疗的障碍。我们建议少强调诊断,多强调个体化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

I'm not a diagnosis: Adolescents' perspectives on user participation and shared decision-making in mental healthcare.

I'm not a diagnosis: Adolescents' perspectives on user participation and shared decision-making in mental healthcare.

I'm not a diagnosis: Adolescents' perspectives on user participation and shared decision-making in mental healthcare.

Background: Adolescents have the right to be involved in decisions affecting their healthcare. More knowledge is needed to provide quality healthcare services that is both suitable for adolescents and in line with policy. Shared decision-making has the potential to combine user participation and evidence-based treatment. Research and governmental policies emphasize shared decision-making as key for high quality mental healthcare services.

Objective: To explore adolescents' experiences with user participation and shared decision-making in mental healthcare inpatient units.

Method: We carried out ten in-depth interviews with adolescents (16-18 years old) in this qualitative study. The participants were admitted to four mental healthcare inpatient clinics in Norway. Transcribed interviews were subjected to qualitative content analysis.

Results: Five themes were identified, representing the adolescents' view of gaining trust, getting help, being understood, being diagnosed and labeled, being pushed, and making a customized treatment plan. Psychoeducational information, mutual trust, and a therapeutic relationship between patients and therapists were considered prerequisites for shared decision-making. For adolescents to be labeled with a diagnosis or forced into a treatment regimen that they did not initiate or control tended to elicit strong resistance. User involvement at admission, participation in the treatment plan, individualized treatment, and collaboration among healthcare professionals were emphasized.

Conclusions: Routines for participation and involvement of adolescents prior to inpatient admission is recommended. Shared decision-making has the potential to increase adolescents' engagement and reduce the incidence of involuntary treatment and re-admission to inpatient clinics. In this study, shared decision-making is linked to empowerment and less to standardized decision tools. To be labeled and dominated by healthcare professionals can be a barrier to adolescents' participation in treatment. We suggest placing less emphasis on diagnoses and more on individualized treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.30%
发文量
12
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信