Stephanie Galibert, Emerson Keenan, Roxanne Hastie, Fiona C Brownfoot
{"title":"晚期早产先兆子痫的管理:产妇和胎儿分娩指征的比较。","authors":"Stephanie Galibert, Emerson Keenan, Roxanne Hastie, Fiona C Brownfoot","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2021.1882980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate delivery indications for women with late preterm preeclampsia and evaluate whether disease characteristics at presentation are predictive of delivery indication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective case-control study at the Mercy Hospital for Women (a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia). Indication for delivery was assessed among women presenting with preeclampsia between 30<sup>+0</sup> and 36<sup>+0</sup> weeks' gestation. Baseline maternal and disease characteristics, preeclampsia features at delivery and postnatal outcomes were compared between patients delivering for maternal, fetal, or for both maternal and fetal indications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>173 women were diagnosed with preeclampsia between 30<sup>+0</sup> and 36<sup>+0</sup> weeks' gestation. Maternal baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. We found that 55.5% of women were delivered on maternal grounds compared to 27.2% requiring delivery for fetal indications; and 17.3% for both maternal and fetal indications (<i>p</i> < .0001). At diagnosis, intrauterine growth restriction and abnormal Dopplers increased the risk of requiring delivery for fetal indications by 3.5 times and 2.4 times respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women presenting with late preterm preeclampsia primarily required delivery for maternal disease progression rather than fetal compromise.</p>","PeriodicalId":520807,"journal":{"name":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","volume":" ","pages":"5431-5437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14767058.2021.1882980","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of late preterm preeclampsia: a comparison of maternal and fetal indications for delivery.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Galibert, Emerson Keenan, Roxanne Hastie, Fiona C Brownfoot\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14767058.2021.1882980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate delivery indications for women with late preterm preeclampsia and evaluate whether disease characteristics at presentation are predictive of delivery indication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective case-control study at the Mercy Hospital for Women (a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia). Indication for delivery was assessed among women presenting with preeclampsia between 30<sup>+0</sup> and 36<sup>+0</sup> weeks' gestation. Baseline maternal and disease characteristics, preeclampsia features at delivery and postnatal outcomes were compared between patients delivering for maternal, fetal, or for both maternal and fetal indications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>173 women were diagnosed with preeclampsia between 30<sup>+0</sup> and 36<sup>+0</sup> weeks' gestation. Maternal baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. We found that 55.5% of women were delivered on maternal grounds compared to 27.2% requiring delivery for fetal indications; and 17.3% for both maternal and fetal indications (<i>p</i> < .0001). At diagnosis, intrauterine growth restriction and abnormal Dopplers increased the risk of requiring delivery for fetal indications by 3.5 times and 2.4 times respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women presenting with late preterm preeclampsia primarily required delivery for maternal disease progression rather than fetal compromise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5431-5437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14767058.2021.1882980\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1882980\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/2/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1882980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Management of late preterm preeclampsia: a comparison of maternal and fetal indications for delivery.
Objective: To investigate delivery indications for women with late preterm preeclampsia and evaluate whether disease characteristics at presentation are predictive of delivery indication.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study at the Mercy Hospital for Women (a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia). Indication for delivery was assessed among women presenting with preeclampsia between 30+0 and 36+0 weeks' gestation. Baseline maternal and disease characteristics, preeclampsia features at delivery and postnatal outcomes were compared between patients delivering for maternal, fetal, or for both maternal and fetal indications.
Results: 173 women were diagnosed with preeclampsia between 30+0 and 36+0 weeks' gestation. Maternal baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. We found that 55.5% of women were delivered on maternal grounds compared to 27.2% requiring delivery for fetal indications; and 17.3% for both maternal and fetal indications (p < .0001). At diagnosis, intrauterine growth restriction and abnormal Dopplers increased the risk of requiring delivery for fetal indications by 3.5 times and 2.4 times respectively.
Conclusion: Women presenting with late preterm preeclampsia primarily required delivery for maternal disease progression rather than fetal compromise.