病毒英雄主义:COVID-19大流行中的英雄修辞告诉我们关于医学和职业身份的什么。

IF 1.3 4区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS
Hec Forum Pub Date : 2021-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-02-07 DOI:10.1007/s10730-020-09434-4
Patrick D Hopkins
{"title":"病毒英雄主义:COVID-19大流行中的英雄修辞告诉我们关于医学和职业身份的什么。","authors":"Patrick D Hopkins","doi":"10.1007/s10730-020-09434-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic the use of the term \"hero\" has been widespread. This is especially common in the context of healthcare workers and it is now unremarkable to see large banners on hospital exteriors that say \"heroes work here\". There is more to be gleaned from the rhetoric of heroism than just awareness of public appreciation, however. Calling physicians and nurses heroes for treating sick people indicates something about the concept of medicine and medical professionals. In this essay, I will examine three aspects of the social role of medicine exposed by the language of heroism. One, if a hero is someone who goes above and the call of duty, then does that mean exposing oneself to risk of infection is no longer a duty of physicians (as it used to be)? If so, does that mean the \"profession\" of medicine is much like any other business? Two, physicians and nurses are not the only \"heroes\" this go-around. Anyone deemed essential to the US \"infrastructure\" is designated by the US government as having \"special responsibilities\" to remain at their posts for the public good, which explicitly puts physicians in the same category as sewage workers and grocery store cashiers. Three, what does it mean to belong to a profession that does (or does not) have self-sacrifice and risk-taking as part of its mission-especially a profession that rarely gets called upon to practice these obligations?</p>","PeriodicalId":46160,"journal":{"name":"Hec Forum","volume":"33 1-2","pages":"109-124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10730-020-09434-4","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Viral Heroism: What the Rhetoric of Heroes in the COVID-19 Pandemic Tells Us About Medicine and Professional Identity.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick D Hopkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10730-020-09434-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic the use of the term \\\"hero\\\" has been widespread. This is especially common in the context of healthcare workers and it is now unremarkable to see large banners on hospital exteriors that say \\\"heroes work here\\\". There is more to be gleaned from the rhetoric of heroism than just awareness of public appreciation, however. Calling physicians and nurses heroes for treating sick people indicates something about the concept of medicine and medical professionals. In this essay, I will examine three aspects of the social role of medicine exposed by the language of heroism. One, if a hero is someone who goes above and the call of duty, then does that mean exposing oneself to risk of infection is no longer a duty of physicians (as it used to be)? If so, does that mean the \\\"profession\\\" of medicine is much like any other business? Two, physicians and nurses are not the only \\\"heroes\\\" this go-around. Anyone deemed essential to the US \\\"infrastructure\\\" is designated by the US government as having \\\"special responsibilities\\\" to remain at their posts for the public good, which explicitly puts physicians in the same category as sewage workers and grocery store cashiers. Three, what does it mean to belong to a profession that does (or does not) have self-sacrifice and risk-taking as part of its mission-especially a profession that rarely gets called upon to practice these obligations?</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hec Forum\",\"volume\":\"33 1-2\",\"pages\":\"109-124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10730-020-09434-4\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hec Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-020-09434-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hec Forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-020-09434-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,“英雄”一词被广泛使用。这在医护人员中尤其常见,现在在医院外面看到写着“英雄在这里工作”的大横幅已经很平常了。然而,从英雄主义的修辞中,除了意识到公众的赞赏之外,还有更多的东西可以收集。把医生和护士称为治疗病人的英雄,表明了医学和医疗专业人员的概念。在这篇文章中,我将研究英雄主义语言所暴露的医学社会角色的三个方面。第一,如果英雄是那些超越自我,履行职责的人,那么这是否意味着将自己暴露在感染风险中不再是医生的职责(就像过去一样)?如果是这样,这是否意味着医学这个“职业”和其他行业很像?第二,医生和护士并不是唯一的“英雄”。任何被认为对美国“基础设施”至关重要的人,都被美国政府指定为负有“特殊责任”,必须为了公共利益而留在自己的岗位上,这明确地将医生与污水处理工人和杂货店收银员归为一类。第三,从事(或不从事)将自我牺牲和冒险作为其使命一部分的职业,尤其是从事很少被要求履行这些义务的职业,这意味着什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Viral Heroism: What the Rhetoric of Heroes in the COVID-19 Pandemic Tells Us About Medicine and Professional Identity.

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic the use of the term "hero" has been widespread. This is especially common in the context of healthcare workers and it is now unremarkable to see large banners on hospital exteriors that say "heroes work here". There is more to be gleaned from the rhetoric of heroism than just awareness of public appreciation, however. Calling physicians and nurses heroes for treating sick people indicates something about the concept of medicine and medical professionals. In this essay, I will examine three aspects of the social role of medicine exposed by the language of heroism. One, if a hero is someone who goes above and the call of duty, then does that mean exposing oneself to risk of infection is no longer a duty of physicians (as it used to be)? If so, does that mean the "profession" of medicine is much like any other business? Two, physicians and nurses are not the only "heroes" this go-around. Anyone deemed essential to the US "infrastructure" is designated by the US government as having "special responsibilities" to remain at their posts for the public good, which explicitly puts physicians in the same category as sewage workers and grocery store cashiers. Three, what does it mean to belong to a profession that does (or does not) have self-sacrifice and risk-taking as part of its mission-especially a profession that rarely gets called upon to practice these obligations?

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hec Forum
Hec Forum ETHICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: HEC Forum is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to practicing physicians, nurses, social workers, risk managers, attorneys, ethicists, and other HEC committee members. Contributions are welcomed from any pertinent source, but the text should be written to be appreciated by HEC members and lay readers. HEC Forum publishes essays, research papers, and features the following sections:Essays on Substantive Bioethical/Health Law Issues Analyses of Procedural or Operational Committee Issues Document Exchange Special Articles International Perspectives Mt./St. Anonymous: Cases and Institutional Policies Point/Counterpoint Argumentation Case Reviews, Analyses, and Resolutions Chairperson''s Section `Tough Spot'' Critical Annotations Health Law Alert Network News Letters to the Editors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信