设计和实施对有物质使用障碍的归国公民的干预:发现同伴康复教练参与试点临床试验决策的好处。

IF 1.1 Q3 SOCIAL WORK
Journal of Offender Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-11 DOI:10.1080/10509674.2020.1863301
Grant Victor, Emily Sightes, Dennis P Watson, Bradley Ray, Katie Bailey, Lisa Robision, Gina Fears, Rhiannon Edwards, Michelle Salyers
{"title":"设计和实施对有物质使用障碍的归国公民的干预:发现同伴康复教练参与试点临床试验决策的好处。","authors":"Grant Victor,&nbsp;Emily Sightes,&nbsp;Dennis P Watson,&nbsp;Bradley Ray,&nbsp;Katie Bailey,&nbsp;Lisa Robision,&nbsp;Gina Fears,&nbsp;Rhiannon Edwards,&nbsp;Michelle Salyers","doi":"10.1080/10509674.2020.1863301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peer-facilitated services in behavioral health care remain underutilized within criminal justice-involved community organizations, and there is little guidance for how to best involve peer workers in behavioral health-focused research activities. This paper described lessons learned regarding implementation of peer recovery coaches (PRCs) as part of development and pilot research on Substance Use Programming for Person-Oriented Recovery and Treatment (SUPPORT), a peer-facilitated substance use disorder (SUD) intervention for returning citizens. Qualitative data were collected from learning meetings with key stakeholders and group interviews with SUPPORT clinical trial participants and PRCs. Transcripts were analyzed to identify key decisions made impacting the development, implementation, and/or revision of the SUPPORT intervention and pilot clinical trial protocols. Analysis demonstrated that PRC involvement drove many of the decisions made regarding modifications to the original intervention and trial protocols, while benefitting client-level interactions and by influencing the non-profit agency and its connection to stakeholders. Moreover, PRCs improved the research design by refining the incentive structure and data collection plans. PRC involvement also contributed to the development of more recovery-oriented resources and catering support services to the unique needs of justice-involved individuals. Discussed were the implications for the role of PRCs in justice-involved behavioral health research and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46878,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Offender Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10509674.2020.1863301","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing and implementing an intervention for returning citizens living with substance use disorder: discovering the benefits of peer recovery coach involvement in pilot clinical trial decision-making.\",\"authors\":\"Grant Victor,&nbsp;Emily Sightes,&nbsp;Dennis P Watson,&nbsp;Bradley Ray,&nbsp;Katie Bailey,&nbsp;Lisa Robision,&nbsp;Gina Fears,&nbsp;Rhiannon Edwards,&nbsp;Michelle Salyers\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10509674.2020.1863301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Peer-facilitated services in behavioral health care remain underutilized within criminal justice-involved community organizations, and there is little guidance for how to best involve peer workers in behavioral health-focused research activities. This paper described lessons learned regarding implementation of peer recovery coaches (PRCs) as part of development and pilot research on Substance Use Programming for Person-Oriented Recovery and Treatment (SUPPORT), a peer-facilitated substance use disorder (SUD) intervention for returning citizens. Qualitative data were collected from learning meetings with key stakeholders and group interviews with SUPPORT clinical trial participants and PRCs. Transcripts were analyzed to identify key decisions made impacting the development, implementation, and/or revision of the SUPPORT intervention and pilot clinical trial protocols. Analysis demonstrated that PRC involvement drove many of the decisions made regarding modifications to the original intervention and trial protocols, while benefitting client-level interactions and by influencing the non-profit agency and its connection to stakeholders. Moreover, PRCs improved the research design by refining the incentive structure and data collection plans. PRC involvement also contributed to the development of more recovery-oriented resources and catering support services to the unique needs of justice-involved individuals. Discussed were the implications for the role of PRCs in justice-involved behavioral health research and treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Offender Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10509674.2020.1863301\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Offender Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2020.1863301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Offender Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2020.1863301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

在涉及刑事司法的社区组织中,行为卫生保健方面的同伴促进服务仍然没有得到充分利用,而且关于如何最好地让同伴工作者参与以行为卫生为重点的研究活动的指导很少。本文描述了关于实施同伴康复教练(prc)的经验教训,作为“面向个人的康复和治疗(支持)物质使用规划”的开发和试点研究的一部分,这是一项针对回归公民的同伴促进物质使用障碍(SUD)干预。定性数据收集自与关键利益相关者的学习会议以及与SUPPORT临床试验参与者和prc的小组访谈。对转录本进行分析,以确定影响SUPPORT干预和试点临床试验方案的发展、实施和/或修订的关键决策。分析表明,中国的参与推动了许多关于修改原始干预和试验方案的决定,同时有利于客户层面的互动,并影响了非营利机构及其与利益相关者的联系。此外,prc通过完善激励结构和数据收集计划来改进研究设计。中华人民共和国的参与也有助于开发更多以恢复为导向的资源,并为参与司法的个人的独特需要提供支助服务。讨论了prc在涉及正义的行为健康研究和治疗中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing and implementing an intervention for returning citizens living with substance use disorder: discovering the benefits of peer recovery coach involvement in pilot clinical trial decision-making.

Peer-facilitated services in behavioral health care remain underutilized within criminal justice-involved community organizations, and there is little guidance for how to best involve peer workers in behavioral health-focused research activities. This paper described lessons learned regarding implementation of peer recovery coaches (PRCs) as part of development and pilot research on Substance Use Programming for Person-Oriented Recovery and Treatment (SUPPORT), a peer-facilitated substance use disorder (SUD) intervention for returning citizens. Qualitative data were collected from learning meetings with key stakeholders and group interviews with SUPPORT clinical trial participants and PRCs. Transcripts were analyzed to identify key decisions made impacting the development, implementation, and/or revision of the SUPPORT intervention and pilot clinical trial protocols. Analysis demonstrated that PRC involvement drove many of the decisions made regarding modifications to the original intervention and trial protocols, while benefitting client-level interactions and by influencing the non-profit agency and its connection to stakeholders. Moreover, PRCs improved the research design by refining the incentive structure and data collection plans. PRC involvement also contributed to the development of more recovery-oriented resources and catering support services to the unique needs of justice-involved individuals. Discussed were the implications for the role of PRCs in justice-involved behavioral health research and treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Journal of Offender Rehabilitation is a multidisciplinary journal of innovation in research, services and programs in criminal justice and corrections. The journal is an essential professional resource for practitioners, educators and researchers who work with individuals involved in the criminal justice system and study the dynamics of rehabilitation and individual and system change. Original research using qualitative or quantitative methodology, theoretical discussions, evaluations of program outcomes, and state of the science reviews will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信