{"title":"中重度银屑病的一线生物治疗和肥胖:来自前瞻性多中心队列Psobioteq的结果。","authors":"Florence Assan, Florence Tubach, Hugo Arlegui, Manuelle Viguier, Marie Beylot-Barry, Alain Dupuy, Nathalie Beneton, Pascal Joly, Denis Jullien, Emmanuel Mahé, Carle Paul, Marie-Aleth Richard, Hervé Bachelez, Caroline Giboin, Olivier Chosidow, Emilie Sbidian","doi":"10.1159/000513398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity is associated with an increased risk of psoriasis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we examined whether body mass index (BMI) is taken into account when choosing first-line biologic therapy for psoriasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cohort study, we compared obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) and non-obese patients for the first-line biologic therapy prescribed, its survival, reasons for discontinuation, therapy optimization, co-prescription of methotrexate and factors associated with long drug survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 931 patients were included: 594 (64%) were male, median age was 46 years (interquartile range 36-56). The most-prescribed biologic agents as first-line treatment were adalimumab (ADA; 42.7%), ustekinumab (UST; 29.9%) and etanercept (ETA; 22.9%); only frequency of infliximab (IFX) prescription differed between groups. Drug survival was significantly shorter for obese than non-obese patients (p < 2.10-4) and was worse for obese than non-obese patients for UST (p = 0.009) and ETA (p = 0.02), with no difference for ADA (p = 0.11). The main reason for discontinuation was primary inefficacy (62%), which was more frequent in obese than non-obese patients. The cumulative incidence of optimization did not significantly differ between the groups, except for ADA (SHR 1.91, 95% CI [1.23-2.96], p = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, risk of discontinuation was associated with only ETA as first-line biologic therapy (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04-2.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlighted the lack of difference in prescription of first-line biologic treatment, except for IFX, between obese and non-obese patients presenting moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Drug survival in obese patients is shorter, mainly because of inefficacy, than in non-obese patients. This highlights the need for targeted pharmacological studies in obese individuals to find optimal administration schemes.</p>","PeriodicalId":144585,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":"338-346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000513398","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First-Line Biologic Therapy and Obesity in Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Results from the Prospective Multicenter Cohort Psobioteq.\",\"authors\":\"Florence Assan, Florence Tubach, Hugo Arlegui, Manuelle Viguier, Marie Beylot-Barry, Alain Dupuy, Nathalie Beneton, Pascal Joly, Denis Jullien, Emmanuel Mahé, Carle Paul, Marie-Aleth Richard, Hervé Bachelez, Caroline Giboin, Olivier Chosidow, Emilie Sbidian\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000513398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity is associated with an increased risk of psoriasis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we examined whether body mass index (BMI) is taken into account when choosing first-line biologic therapy for psoriasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cohort study, we compared obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) and non-obese patients for the first-line biologic therapy prescribed, its survival, reasons for discontinuation, therapy optimization, co-prescription of methotrexate and factors associated with long drug survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 931 patients were included: 594 (64%) were male, median age was 46 years (interquartile range 36-56). The most-prescribed biologic agents as first-line treatment were adalimumab (ADA; 42.7%), ustekinumab (UST; 29.9%) and etanercept (ETA; 22.9%); only frequency of infliximab (IFX) prescription differed between groups. Drug survival was significantly shorter for obese than non-obese patients (p < 2.10-4) and was worse for obese than non-obese patients for UST (p = 0.009) and ETA (p = 0.02), with no difference for ADA (p = 0.11). The main reason for discontinuation was primary inefficacy (62%), which was more frequent in obese than non-obese patients. The cumulative incidence of optimization did not significantly differ between the groups, except for ADA (SHR 1.91, 95% CI [1.23-2.96], p = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, risk of discontinuation was associated with only ETA as first-line biologic therapy (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04-2.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlighted the lack of difference in prescription of first-line biologic treatment, except for IFX, between obese and non-obese patients presenting moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Drug survival in obese patients is shorter, mainly because of inefficacy, than in non-obese patients. This highlights the need for targeted pharmacological studies in obese individuals to find optimal administration schemes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":144585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"338-346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000513398\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000513398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000513398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
背景:肥胖与牛皮癣风险增加有关。目的:在本研究中,我们探讨在选择银屑病一线生物治疗时是否考虑体重指数(BMI)。方法:在本队列研究中,我们比较肥胖(BMI≥30 kg/m2)和非肥胖患者的一线生物治疗处方、生存期、停药原因、治疗优化、甲氨蝶呤联合处方以及与药物长期生存相关的因素。结果:共纳入931例患者:男性594例(64%),中位年龄46岁(四分位数范围36 ~ 56岁)。阿达木单抗(ADA;42.7%), ustekinumab (UST;29.9%)和依那西普(ETA;22.9%);仅英夫利昔单抗(IFX)处方频率在两组间存在差异。肥胖患者的药物生存期明显短于非肥胖患者(p < 2.10-4),肥胖患者在UST (p = 0.009)和ETA (p = 0.02)方面的生存期差于非肥胖患者,而ADA的生存期无差异(p = 0.11)。停药的主要原因是原发性无效(62%),肥胖患者比非肥胖患者更常见。除ADA外,各组间优化的累积发生率无显著差异(SHR为1.91,95% CI [1.23-2.96], p = 0.005)。在多变量分析中,停药风险仅与ETA作为一线生物治疗相关(HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04-2.19)。结论:本研究突出了肥胖与非肥胖中重度牛皮癣患者一线生物治疗处方差异,IFX除外。肥胖患者的药物生存期比非肥胖患者短,主要是因为药物无效。这突出了需要针对肥胖个体进行药理学研究,以找到最佳的给药方案。
First-Line Biologic Therapy and Obesity in Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Results from the Prospective Multicenter Cohort Psobioteq.
Background: Obesity is associated with an increased risk of psoriasis.
Objective: In this study, we examined whether body mass index (BMI) is taken into account when choosing first-line biologic therapy for psoriasis.
Methods: In this cohort study, we compared obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) and non-obese patients for the first-line biologic therapy prescribed, its survival, reasons for discontinuation, therapy optimization, co-prescription of methotrexate and factors associated with long drug survival.
Results: A total of 931 patients were included: 594 (64%) were male, median age was 46 years (interquartile range 36-56). The most-prescribed biologic agents as first-line treatment were adalimumab (ADA; 42.7%), ustekinumab (UST; 29.9%) and etanercept (ETA; 22.9%); only frequency of infliximab (IFX) prescription differed between groups. Drug survival was significantly shorter for obese than non-obese patients (p < 2.10-4) and was worse for obese than non-obese patients for UST (p = 0.009) and ETA (p = 0.02), with no difference for ADA (p = 0.11). The main reason for discontinuation was primary inefficacy (62%), which was more frequent in obese than non-obese patients. The cumulative incidence of optimization did not significantly differ between the groups, except for ADA (SHR 1.91, 95% CI [1.23-2.96], p = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, risk of discontinuation was associated with only ETA as first-line biologic therapy (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04-2.19).
Conclusion: This study highlighted the lack of difference in prescription of first-line biologic treatment, except for IFX, between obese and non-obese patients presenting moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Drug survival in obese patients is shorter, mainly because of inefficacy, than in non-obese patients. This highlights the need for targeted pharmacological studies in obese individuals to find optimal administration schemes.