{"title":"跨课程类型的中国大学mooc英语讲师元语篇","authors":"Dongyun Zhang, Diyun Sheng","doi":"10.1007/s41701-021-00098-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the spread of COVID-19 in China at the beginning of 2020, MOOCs, as a kind of currently popular online learning resource, have played a dominant role in higher education field. However, chiefly focusing on teaching organization and learning process in MOOCs, previous studies have paid inadequate attention to lecturers' discourse. In order to provide some useful views on this issue, this study investigates EFL lecturers' metadiscourse in Chinese university MOOCs to sketch its distinctive pattern across course types. Based on a self-built corpus, this research adopted interpersonal model as theoretical foundation and analyzed the frequency and functions of metadiscourse by AntConc 3.5.7 and IBM SPSS 23. Findings suggest that specific educational context in MOOCs leads to low frequency of metadiscourse and its use is mainly aimed at the enhancement of intelligibility, reliability, and interactivity. Besides, course types with different knowledge structures also exert certain influence on metadiscourse usage. Course types focusing on procedural knowledge (i.e. the knowledge related to practical process) tend to apply metadiscourse to enhance intelligibility and interactivity, while the ones stressing declarative knowledge (i.e. the knowledge related to explicit facts) attach more importance to reliability. Lastly, the paper concludes with implications for EFL lecturers' metadiscourse in Chinese university MOOCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":52343,"journal":{"name":"Corpus Pragmatics","volume":"5 2","pages":"243-270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s41701-021-00098-0","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFL Lecturers' Metadiscourse in Chinese University MOOCs Across Course Types.\",\"authors\":\"Dongyun Zhang, Diyun Sheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41701-021-00098-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With the spread of COVID-19 in China at the beginning of 2020, MOOCs, as a kind of currently popular online learning resource, have played a dominant role in higher education field. However, chiefly focusing on teaching organization and learning process in MOOCs, previous studies have paid inadequate attention to lecturers' discourse. In order to provide some useful views on this issue, this study investigates EFL lecturers' metadiscourse in Chinese university MOOCs to sketch its distinctive pattern across course types. Based on a self-built corpus, this research adopted interpersonal model as theoretical foundation and analyzed the frequency and functions of metadiscourse by AntConc 3.5.7 and IBM SPSS 23. Findings suggest that specific educational context in MOOCs leads to low frequency of metadiscourse and its use is mainly aimed at the enhancement of intelligibility, reliability, and interactivity. Besides, course types with different knowledge structures also exert certain influence on metadiscourse usage. Course types focusing on procedural knowledge (i.e. the knowledge related to practical process) tend to apply metadiscourse to enhance intelligibility and interactivity, while the ones stressing declarative knowledge (i.e. the knowledge related to explicit facts) attach more importance to reliability. Lastly, the paper concludes with implications for EFL lecturers' metadiscourse in Chinese university MOOCs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corpus Pragmatics\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"243-270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s41701-021-00098-0\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corpus Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-021-00098-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corpus Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-021-00098-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
EFL Lecturers' Metadiscourse in Chinese University MOOCs Across Course Types.
With the spread of COVID-19 in China at the beginning of 2020, MOOCs, as a kind of currently popular online learning resource, have played a dominant role in higher education field. However, chiefly focusing on teaching organization and learning process in MOOCs, previous studies have paid inadequate attention to lecturers' discourse. In order to provide some useful views on this issue, this study investigates EFL lecturers' metadiscourse in Chinese university MOOCs to sketch its distinctive pattern across course types. Based on a self-built corpus, this research adopted interpersonal model as theoretical foundation and analyzed the frequency and functions of metadiscourse by AntConc 3.5.7 and IBM SPSS 23. Findings suggest that specific educational context in MOOCs leads to low frequency of metadiscourse and its use is mainly aimed at the enhancement of intelligibility, reliability, and interactivity. Besides, course types with different knowledge structures also exert certain influence on metadiscourse usage. Course types focusing on procedural knowledge (i.e. the knowledge related to practical process) tend to apply metadiscourse to enhance intelligibility and interactivity, while the ones stressing declarative knowledge (i.e. the knowledge related to explicit facts) attach more importance to reliability. Lastly, the paper concludes with implications for EFL lecturers' metadiscourse in Chinese university MOOCs.
期刊介绍:
Corpus Pragmatics offers a forum for theoretical and applied linguists who carry out research in the new linguistic discipline that stands at the interface between corpus linguistics and pragmatics. The journal promotes the combination of the two approaches through research on new topics in linguistics, with a particular focus on interdisciplinary studies, and to enlarge and implement current pragmatic theories that have hitherto not benefited from empirical corpus support. Authors are encouraged to describe the statistical analyses used in their research and to supply the data and scripts in R when possible. The objective of Corpus Pragmatics is to develop pragmatics with the aid of quantitative corpus methodology. The journal accepts original research papers, short research notes, and occasional thematic issues. The journal follows a double-blind peer review system.