在丹麦创伤暴露的幼儿样本中验证婴儿和学龄前诊断评估。

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Sille Schandorph Løkkegaard, Mette Elmose, Ask Elklit
{"title":"在丹麦创伤暴露的幼儿样本中验证婴儿和学龄前诊断评估。","authors":"Sille Schandorph Løkkegaard,&nbsp;Mette Elmose,&nbsp;Ask Elklit","doi":"10.21307/sjcapp-2019-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There exist only few developmentally sensitive assessment instruments for identifying posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other potentially comorbid affective and behavioral symptomatology in preschool children. Consequently, young children who exhibit post-trauma symptomatology risk not being identified and not receiving the appropriate treatment. One of the few instruments that exist is the Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment (DIPA).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine internal reliability and convergent validity of the Danish version of the DIPA, a semi-structured interview of caregivers about their child's mental health.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In total, 62 caregivers of trauma-exposed children aged 1-6 years were interviewed with the DIPA and completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The children had experienced between one and eight traumas (Mdn = 3). Based on the DIPA, 48.4% of the children exhibited PTSD. The DIPA showed good to excellent internal consistency for the disorders of major depressive disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, separation anxiety disorder and overall internal consistency of PTSD and reactive attachment disorder. Internal consistency was lower for each symptom cluster of PTSD and the overall consistency of sleep disorder with Cronbach's alpha ranging between 0.54 and 0.69. Correlations between continuous scores of eight disorders of the DIPA and SDQ scales provided support for convergent validity of the DIPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study provides preliminary evidence to support the Danish version of DIPA as a valid measure of symptoms of young children exposed to psychological trauma. As a standardized assessment tool, the DIPA can aid in early and structured assessment of young children exposed to trauma and can help guide treatment for those in need.</p>","PeriodicalId":42655,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","volume":"7 ","pages":"39-51"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e2/44/sjcapp-07-007.PMC7709942.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment in a Danish, trauma-exposed sample of young children.\",\"authors\":\"Sille Schandorph Løkkegaard,&nbsp;Mette Elmose,&nbsp;Ask Elklit\",\"doi\":\"10.21307/sjcapp-2019-007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There exist only few developmentally sensitive assessment instruments for identifying posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other potentially comorbid affective and behavioral symptomatology in preschool children. Consequently, young children who exhibit post-trauma symptomatology risk not being identified and not receiving the appropriate treatment. One of the few instruments that exist is the Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment (DIPA).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine internal reliability and convergent validity of the Danish version of the DIPA, a semi-structured interview of caregivers about their child's mental health.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In total, 62 caregivers of trauma-exposed children aged 1-6 years were interviewed with the DIPA and completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The children had experienced between one and eight traumas (Mdn = 3). Based on the DIPA, 48.4% of the children exhibited PTSD. The DIPA showed good to excellent internal consistency for the disorders of major depressive disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, separation anxiety disorder and overall internal consistency of PTSD and reactive attachment disorder. Internal consistency was lower for each symptom cluster of PTSD and the overall consistency of sleep disorder with Cronbach's alpha ranging between 0.54 and 0.69. Correlations between continuous scores of eight disorders of the DIPA and SDQ scales provided support for convergent validity of the DIPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study provides preliminary evidence to support the Danish version of DIPA as a valid measure of symptoms of young children exposed to psychological trauma. As a standardized assessment tool, the DIPA can aid in early and structured assessment of young children exposed to trauma and can help guide treatment for those in need.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"39-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e2/44/sjcapp-07-007.PMC7709942.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21307/sjcapp-2019-007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/sjcapp-2019-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:目前用于识别学龄前儿童创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和其他潜在共病的情感和行为症状的发育敏感评估工具很少。因此,表现出创伤后症状的幼儿有可能没有被识别出来,也没有得到适当的治疗。存在的少数工具之一是诊断婴儿和学龄前儿童评估(DIPA)。目的:检验丹麦版DIPA的内部信度和收敛效度,这是一项对照顾者关于他们孩子心理健康的半结构化访谈。方法:对62名1 ~ 6岁创伤暴露儿童的照顾者进行DIPA访谈,并填写“优势与困难问卷”(SDQ)。结果:儿童经历过1 ~ 8次创伤(Mdn = 3)。基于DIPA, 48.4%的儿童表现为PTSD。DIPA对重性抑郁症、注意缺陷多动障碍、对立违抗障碍、分离焦虑障碍以及PTSD和反应性依恋障碍的整体内部一致性均表现出良好至优异的内部一致性。PTSD各症状群的内部一致性较低,睡眠障碍整体一致性较低,Cronbach's alpha在0.54 ~ 0.69之间。DIPA的8种障碍连续得分与SDQ量表的相关性支持了DIPA的收敛效度。结论:该研究提供了初步证据,支持丹麦版DIPA作为幼儿暴露于心理创伤症状的有效测量。作为一种标准化的评估工具,DIPA可以帮助对遭受创伤的幼儿进行早期和有组织的评估,并可以帮助指导有需要的儿童的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Validation of the Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment in a Danish, trauma-exposed sample of young children.

Validation of the Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment in a Danish, trauma-exposed sample of young children.

Validation of the Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment in a Danish, trauma-exposed sample of young children.

Validation of the Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment in a Danish, trauma-exposed sample of young children.

Background: There exist only few developmentally sensitive assessment instruments for identifying posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other potentially comorbid affective and behavioral symptomatology in preschool children. Consequently, young children who exhibit post-trauma symptomatology risk not being identified and not receiving the appropriate treatment. One of the few instruments that exist is the Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment (DIPA).

Objective: To examine internal reliability and convergent validity of the Danish version of the DIPA, a semi-structured interview of caregivers about their child's mental health.

Method: In total, 62 caregivers of trauma-exposed children aged 1-6 years were interviewed with the DIPA and completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).

Results: The children had experienced between one and eight traumas (Mdn = 3). Based on the DIPA, 48.4% of the children exhibited PTSD. The DIPA showed good to excellent internal consistency for the disorders of major depressive disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, separation anxiety disorder and overall internal consistency of PTSD and reactive attachment disorder. Internal consistency was lower for each symptom cluster of PTSD and the overall consistency of sleep disorder with Cronbach's alpha ranging between 0.54 and 0.69. Correlations between continuous scores of eight disorders of the DIPA and SDQ scales provided support for convergent validity of the DIPA.

Conclusion: The study provides preliminary evidence to support the Danish version of DIPA as a valid measure of symptoms of young children exposed to psychological trauma. As a standardized assessment tool, the DIPA can aid in early and structured assessment of young children exposed to trauma and can help guide treatment for those in need.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.30%
发文量
12
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信