Richard A Inman, Ana Margarida Sousa, Diana Cunha, Paulo Moreira
{"title":"青少年的治疗反应:青少年治疗反应量表的心理测量学。","authors":"Richard A Inman, Ana Margarida Sousa, Diana Cunha, Paulo Moreira","doi":"10.21307/sjcapp-2019-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Therapeutic Reactance Scale (TRS) is a classic measure of psychological reactance, yet only two studies have evaluated its factorial structure. Both proposed different multidimensional structures based on exploratory analyses. Not only is the factorial structure of the TRS unclear, but the scale has yet to be validated in adolescents.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to test the factorial structure of the TRS in adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and analyses of reliability and validity, with a sample of 1,344 adolescents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A four-factor model fits well to the data. Three of the four TRS dimensions (not susceptibility to influence, SI) were correlated with the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale (HPRS). These three dimensions were also correlated with novelty seeking, cooperativeness and persistence components of personality (Cloninger's psychobiological model of personality), while SI showed a different pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, this study demonstrates that the TRS is a suitable and potentially useful tool for measuring reactance in adolescents, but the authors propose that practitioners may wish to consider excluding items pertaining to the SI dimension.</p>","PeriodicalId":42655,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","volume":"7 ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/47/a4/sjcapp-07-003.PMC7709934.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic reactance in adolescents: the psychometrics of the Therapeutic Reactance Scale in adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Richard A Inman, Ana Margarida Sousa, Diana Cunha, Paulo Moreira\",\"doi\":\"10.21307/sjcapp-2019-003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Therapeutic Reactance Scale (TRS) is a classic measure of psychological reactance, yet only two studies have evaluated its factorial structure. Both proposed different multidimensional structures based on exploratory analyses. Not only is the factorial structure of the TRS unclear, but the scale has yet to be validated in adolescents.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to test the factorial structure of the TRS in adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and analyses of reliability and validity, with a sample of 1,344 adolescents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A four-factor model fits well to the data. Three of the four TRS dimensions (not susceptibility to influence, SI) were correlated with the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale (HPRS). These three dimensions were also correlated with novelty seeking, cooperativeness and persistence components of personality (Cloninger's psychobiological model of personality), while SI showed a different pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, this study demonstrates that the TRS is a suitable and potentially useful tool for measuring reactance in adolescents, but the authors propose that practitioners may wish to consider excluding items pertaining to the SI dimension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/47/a4/sjcapp-07-003.PMC7709934.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21307/sjcapp-2019-003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21307/sjcapp-2019-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:治疗反应量表(TRS)是测量心理反应的经典量表,但只有两项研究对其因子结构进行了评估。这两项研究都在探索性分析的基础上提出了不同的多维结构。TRS的因子结构不仅不明确,而且该量表尚未在青少年中得到验证:本研究旨在测试青少年 TRS 的因子结构:作者对 1344 名青少年样本进行了探索性和确认性因子分析,以及信度和效度分析:结果:四因素模型与数据非常吻合。在 TRS 的四个维度中,有三个维度(非易受影响性,SI)与洪氏心理反应量表(HPRS)相关。这三个维度也与人格中的求新、合作和坚持部分(克罗宁格的人格心理生物学模型)相关,而 SI 则显示出不同的模式:总之,本研究表明,TRS 是测量青少年反应性的合适且可能有用的工具,但作者建议从业人员不妨考虑排除与 SI 维度相关的项目。
Therapeutic reactance in adolescents: the psychometrics of the Therapeutic Reactance Scale in adolescents.
Background: The Therapeutic Reactance Scale (TRS) is a classic measure of psychological reactance, yet only two studies have evaluated its factorial structure. Both proposed different multidimensional structures based on exploratory analyses. Not only is the factorial structure of the TRS unclear, but the scale has yet to be validated in adolescents.
Objective: This study aimed to test the factorial structure of the TRS in adolescents.
Methods: The authors conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and analyses of reliability and validity, with a sample of 1,344 adolescents.
Results: A four-factor model fits well to the data. Three of the four TRS dimensions (not susceptibility to influence, SI) were correlated with the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale (HPRS). These three dimensions were also correlated with novelty seeking, cooperativeness and persistence components of personality (Cloninger's psychobiological model of personality), while SI showed a different pattern.
Conclusions: Overall, this study demonstrates that the TRS is a suitable and potentially useful tool for measuring reactance in adolescents, but the authors propose that practitioners may wish to consider excluding items pertaining to the SI dimension.