气管切开术能释放多少呼气末正压?文献综述与实验。

IF 1.8 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Research and Practice Pub Date : 2021-01-13 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/6036891
Martin Thomas, Riddhi Joshi, Grant Cave
{"title":"气管切开术能释放多少呼气末正压?文献综述与实验。","authors":"Martin Thomas,&nbsp;Riddhi Joshi,&nbsp;Grant Cave","doi":"10.1155/2021/6036891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High flow tracheostomy (HFT) is a commonly used weaning and humidification strategy for tracheostomised patients, but little is known as to how much PEEP or mechanical benefit it offers. Patient anatomy and device characteristics differentiate it from high flow nasal cannula and the physiological effects observed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) To review the available literature on the effects of HFT on airway pressure and indices of gas exchange. (2) To quantify PEEP generated by a HFT  circuit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomised benchtop experiment was conducted, with a size 8 uncuffed Portex tracheostomy connected to an Optiflow™ with Airvo 2™ humidifier system. The tracheostomy tube was partially immersed in water to give rise to a column of water within the inner surface of the tube. An air fluid interface was generated with flows of 40 L/min, 50 L/min, and 60 L/min. The amount of potential PEEP (pPEEP) generated was determined by the distance the water column was pushed downward by the flow delivered. <i>Findings</i>. Overall 40 L/min, 50 L/min, and 60 L/min provided pPEEP of approximately 0.3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 0.5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, and 0.9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, respectively. There was a statistically significant change in pPEEP with change in flows from 40-60 L/min with an average change in pPEEP of 0.25-0.35 cmH<sub>2</sub>O per 10 L/min flow (<i>p</i> value <0.01). <i>Interpretation</i>. HFT  can generate measurable and variable PEEP despite the open system used. The pPEEP generated with HFT is minimal despite statistically significant change with increasing flows. This pPEEP is unlikely to provide mechanical benefit in weaning patients off ventilatory support.</p>","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"6036891"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817301/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Much PEEP Does High Flow Deliver via Tracheostomy? A Literature Review and Benchtop Experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Thomas,&nbsp;Riddhi Joshi,&nbsp;Grant Cave\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2021/6036891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High flow tracheostomy (HFT) is a commonly used weaning and humidification strategy for tracheostomised patients, but little is known as to how much PEEP or mechanical benefit it offers. Patient anatomy and device characteristics differentiate it from high flow nasal cannula and the physiological effects observed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) To review the available literature on the effects of HFT on airway pressure and indices of gas exchange. (2) To quantify PEEP generated by a HFT  circuit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomised benchtop experiment was conducted, with a size 8 uncuffed Portex tracheostomy connected to an Optiflow™ with Airvo 2™ humidifier system. The tracheostomy tube was partially immersed in water to give rise to a column of water within the inner surface of the tube. An air fluid interface was generated with flows of 40 L/min, 50 L/min, and 60 L/min. The amount of potential PEEP (pPEEP) generated was determined by the distance the water column was pushed downward by the flow delivered. <i>Findings</i>. Overall 40 L/min, 50 L/min, and 60 L/min provided pPEEP of approximately 0.3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 0.5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, and 0.9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, respectively. There was a statistically significant change in pPEEP with change in flows from 40-60 L/min with an average change in pPEEP of 0.25-0.35 cmH<sub>2</sub>O per 10 L/min flow (<i>p</i> value <0.01). <i>Interpretation</i>. HFT  can generate measurable and variable PEEP despite the open system used. The pPEEP generated with HFT is minimal despite statistically significant change with increasing flows. This pPEEP is unlikely to provide mechanical benefit in weaning patients off ventilatory support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"6036891\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817301/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6036891\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6036891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:高流量气管造口术(HFT)是气管造口患者常用的脱机和湿化策略,但很少有人知道它能提供多少PEEP或机械效益。患者解剖和器械特点将其与高流量鼻插管区分开来,并观察到生理效应。目的:(1)综述高频通气对气道压力及气体交换指标影响的文献。(2)量化高频交易电路产生的PEEP。方法:进行随机台式实验,将8号无套管Portex气管切开术连接到Optiflow™与Airvo 2™加湿器系统。将气管造口管部分浸入水中,使管内表面形成水柱。在40 L/min、50 L/min和60 L/min的流量下产生了一个空气-流体界面。产生的电位正压(pep)的量是由水流将水柱向下推的距离决定的。发现。总的来说,40 L/min、50 L/min和60 L/min分别提供约0.3 cmH2O、0.5 cmH2O和0.9 cmH2O的pepp。随着流量在40-60 L/min之间变化,pPEEP的变化具有统计学意义,每10 L/min流量的pPEEP平均变化为0.25-0.35 cmH2O (p值解释)。高频交易可以产生可测量的和可变的PEEP,尽管使用开放的系统。高频交易产生的pep最小,尽管随着流量的增加有统计学上的显著变化。这种pPEEP不太可能在使患者脱离呼吸支持时提供机械益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How Much PEEP Does High Flow Deliver via Tracheostomy? A Literature Review and Benchtop Experiment.

How Much PEEP Does High Flow Deliver via Tracheostomy? A Literature Review and Benchtop Experiment.

How Much PEEP Does High Flow Deliver via Tracheostomy? A Literature Review and Benchtop Experiment.

How Much PEEP Does High Flow Deliver via Tracheostomy? A Literature Review and Benchtop Experiment.

Background: High flow tracheostomy (HFT) is a commonly used weaning and humidification strategy for tracheostomised patients, but little is known as to how much PEEP or mechanical benefit it offers. Patient anatomy and device characteristics differentiate it from high flow nasal cannula and the physiological effects observed.

Objectives: (1) To review the available literature on the effects of HFT on airway pressure and indices of gas exchange. (2) To quantify PEEP generated by a HFT  circuit.

Methods: A randomised benchtop experiment was conducted, with a size 8 uncuffed Portex tracheostomy connected to an Optiflow™ with Airvo 2™ humidifier system. The tracheostomy tube was partially immersed in water to give rise to a column of water within the inner surface of the tube. An air fluid interface was generated with flows of 40 L/min, 50 L/min, and 60 L/min. The amount of potential PEEP (pPEEP) generated was determined by the distance the water column was pushed downward by the flow delivered. Findings. Overall 40 L/min, 50 L/min, and 60 L/min provided pPEEP of approximately 0.3 cmH2O, 0.5 cmH2O, and 0.9 cmH2O, respectively. There was a statistically significant change in pPEEP with change in flows from 40-60 L/min with an average change in pPEEP of 0.25-0.35 cmH2O per 10 L/min flow (p value <0.01). Interpretation. HFT  can generate measurable and variable PEEP despite the open system used. The pPEEP generated with HFT is minimal despite statistically significant change with increasing flows. This pPEEP is unlikely to provide mechanical benefit in weaning patients off ventilatory support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Research and Practice
Critical Care Research and Practice CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信